IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i9p1747-d1231764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Cultivation Systems on Weed Suppression and the Canopy Architecture of Spring Barley

Author

Listed:
  • Roman Wacławowicz

    (Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl. Grunwaldzki 24A, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Magdalena Giemza

    (DLF Beet Seed ApS, Højbygårdvej 31, 4960 Holeby, Denmark)

  • Elżbieta Pytlarz

    (Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl. Grunwaldzki 24A, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Anna Wenda-Piesik

    (Department of Agronomics, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

Abstract

Under the pro-environmental principles of agricultural production, soil cultivation and organic fertilization are of particular importance as strategical elements in reducing weed infestation in the context of sustainable agriculture. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of long-term practices that are used in regenerative agriculture (reducing soil tillage, cover crop management, and mineral nitrogen fertilization) on canopy weed infestation and the elements of spring barley architecture. Understanding the impact of the studied factors influences decision-making regarding weed infestation control, and thus may contribute to a reduction in herbicide use. A two-factor field experiment was conducted using the split-plot method. The main factors were four cultivation methods: 1. conventional tillage without a cover crop, 2. conventional tillage + cover crop, 3. reduced tillage + cover crop, and 4. no tillage + cover crop. The subplot factor was differentiated via nitrogen fertilization, at 40, 80, or 120 kg N∙ha −1 . The research covered canopy weed infestation and the parameters of spring barley canopy architecture. The species composition; the number and weight of weeds; and, for barley, the leaf area index (LAI), density, length, and tillers were determined. The test results were statistically analyzed (ANOVA) in a series of experiments while using Tukey’s test for a significance level of p = 0.05. Additionally, simple linear regression analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and data clustering (CA) were utilized. The study showed that simplified tillage contributed to reducing the number of weeds in the barley tillering stage, while also contributing to an increase in weed infestation during grain harvest. Plowing in the cover crop did not reduce the presence of undesirable plants in the canopy, while increasing doses of nitrogen fertilization contributed to a reduction in the number of weeds without affecting their mass. Weed infestation was also affected by meteorological conditions. Increased rainfall in the early stages of barley development benefits the number of weeds, especially in terms of traditional cultivation. Simplified tillage resulted in a reduction in barley density, height, and LAI, as well as an increase in the branching of the tested cereal. A significant negative correlation was also found between the weed infestation of the barley canopy and the characteristics of the canopy architecture. The PCA showed that the highest tillering of barley was provided at the lowest intensity of weed infestation. In turn, the CA indicated that the significantly higher LAI that resulted from a higher density and length of barley was attributed to the simplified cultivation treatments and the practice of direct sowing. It is a comprehensive method that can favor barley growth and development conditions while weakening weed infestation potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Roman Wacławowicz & Magdalena Giemza & Elżbieta Pytlarz & Anna Wenda-Piesik, 2023. "The Impact of Cultivation Systems on Weed Suppression and the Canopy Architecture of Spring Barley," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1747-:d:1231764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1747/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1747/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shilei Cui & Yajuan Li & Xiaoqiang Jiao & Dong Zhang, 2022. "Hierarchical Linkage between the Basic Characteristics of Smallholders and Technology Awareness Determines Small-Holders’ Willingness to Adopt Green Production Technology," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Oscar Chichongue & Johan van Tol & Gert Ceronio & Chris Du Preez, 2020. "Effects of Tillage Systems and Cropping Patterns on Soil Physical Properties in Mozambique," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Carolina Bilibio & Daniel Uteau & Malte Horvat & Ulla Rosskopf & Stephan Martin Junge & Maria Renate Finckh & Stephan Peth, 2023. "Impact of Ten Years Conservation Tillage in Organic Farming on Soil Physical Properties in a Loess Soil—Northern Hesse, Germany," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Roman Kemper & Tábata A. Bublitz & Phillip Müller & Timo Kautz & Thomas F. Döring & Miriam Athmann, 2020. "Vertical Root Distribution of Different Cover Crops Determined with the Profile Wall Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Alexandra Schappert & Miriam H. Messelhäuser & Marcus Saile & Gerassimos G. Peteinatos & Roland Gerhards, 2018. "Weed Suppressive Ability of Cover Crop Mixtures Compared to Repeated Stubble Tillage and Glyphosate Treatments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Beata Feledyn-Szewczyk & Janusz Smagacz & Cezary A. Kwiatkowski & Elżbieta Harasim & Andrzej Woźniak, 2020. "Weed Flora and Soil Seed Bank Composition as Affected by Tillage System in Three-Year Crop Rotation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rafał Górski & Robert Rosa & Alicja Niewiadomska & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Katarzyna Głuchowska & Anna Płaza, 2024. "The Use of a Composition of Bacterial Consortia and Living Mulch to Reduce Weeds in Organic Spring Barley Cultivation as an Element of Sustainable Plant Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Bianca B. Barreto & Fernando P. Rivera & Blair M. McKenzie & Katharine Preedy & Yangminghao Liu & Lionel X. Dupuy & Elisângela Ribeiro & Roberto A. Braga, 2023. "Analysis of the Effect of Tilling and Crop Type on Soil Structure Using 3D Laser Profilometry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roland Gerhards & Miriam H. Messelhäuser & Bernd Sievernich, 2022. "Suppressing Alopecurus myosuroides in winter cereals by delayed sowing and pre-emergence herbicides," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(6), pages 290-298.
    2. Felicia Cheţan & Teodor Rusu & Cornel Cheţan & Camelia Urdă & Raluca Rezi & Alina Şimon & Ileana Bogdan, 2022. "Influence of Soil Tillage Systems on the Yield and Weeds Infestation in the Soybean Crop," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Inga Dirks & Juliane Streit & Catharina Meinen, 2021. "Above and Belowground Relative Yield Total of Clover–Ryegrass Mixtures Exceed One in Wet and Dry Years," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Bo Liu & Na Li & Cairong Liao, 2024. "Effects of Social Capital on the Adoption of Green Production Technologies by Rice Farmers: Moderation Effects Based on Risk Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Anna Kocira & Mariola Staniak, 2021. "Weed Ecology and New Approaches for Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-6, March.
    6. Yuying Liu & Rubin Chen & Yufan Chen & Tinglei Yu & Xinhong Fu, 2024. "Impact of the degree of agricultural green production technology adoption on income: evidence from Sichuan citrus growers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Yusheng Chen & Zhaofa Sun & Yanmei Wang & Ye Ma & Yongwei Zhou, 2024. "The Green Development in Saline–Alkali Lands: The Evolutionary Game Framework of Small Farmers, Family Farms, and Seed Industry Enterprises," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Miriam H. Messelhäuser & Marcus Saile & Bernd Sievernich & Roland Gerhards, 2021. "Effect of cinmethylin against Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. in winter cereals," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(1), pages 46-54.
    9. Huanhuan Zhang & Guogang Wang & Jinge Liu & Shuai Hao & Shengnan Huang, 2022. "The Influence of Converting Food Crops to Forage Crops Policy Implementation on Herbivorous Livestock Husbandry Development—Based on Policy Pilot Counties in Hebei, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Chengmin Li & Haoyu Deng & Guoxin Yu & Rong Kong & Jian Liu, 2024. "Impact Effects of Cooperative Participation on the Adoption Behavior of Green Production Technologies by Cotton Farmers and the Driving Mechanisms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Lihua Liu & Shize Cui & Meng Qin & Liqiang Chen & Dawei Yin & Xiaohong Guo & Hongyu Li & Guiping Zheng, 2022. "Effects of Continuous Ridge Tillage at Two Fertilizer Depths on Microbial Community Structure and Rice Yield," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Barbara Sawicka & Barbara Krochmal-Marczak & Piotr Barbaś & Piotr Pszczółkowski & Marek Ćwintal, 2020. "Biodiversity of Weeds in Fields of Grain in South-Eastern Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Wen Xiang & Jianzhong Gao, 2023. "Do Not Be Anticlimactic: Farmers’ Behavior in the Sustainable Application of Green Agricultural Technology—A Perceived Value and Government Support Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Jolanta Bojarszczuk & Janusz Podleśny, 2020. "Segetal Diversity in Selected Legume Crops Depending on Soil Tillage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Andrzej Woźniak & Leszek Rachoń, 2020. "Effect of Tillage Systems on the Yield and Quality of Winter Wheat Grain and Soil Properties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    16. Yang Guo & Meiling Cui & Zhigang Xu, 2023. "Spatial Characteristics of Transfer Plots and Conservation Tillage Technology Adoption: Evidence from a Survey of Four Provinces in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Eliza Gaweł & Mieczysław Grzelak & Bogusława Waliszewska & Magdalena Janyszek-Sołtysiak, 2022. "The Impact of the Renovation of Grassland on the Development of Segetal Weeds in Organic Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Leshan Yu & Hengtong Shi & Haixia Wu & Xiangmiao Hu & Yan Ge & Leshui Yu & Wenyu Cao, 2024. "The Role of Climate Change Perceptions in Sustainable Agricultural Development: Evidence from Conservation Tillage Technology Adoption in Northern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Mengtian Zhang & Huiling Wang, 2024. "Exploring the Factors Affecting Farmers’ Willingness to Cultivate Eco-Agriculture in the Qilian Mountain National Park Based on an Extended TPB Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1747-:d:1231764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.