IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i2p422-d1064894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Real-Time Shrimp with and without Shells Recognition Method for Automatic Peeling Machines Based on Tactile Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Xueshen Chen

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Yuesong Xiong

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Peina Dang

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Chonggang Tao

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Changpeng Wu

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Enzao Zhang

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Tao Wu

    (College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

Abstract

Accurate and automatic real-time recognition of shrimp with and without shells is the key to improve the efficiency of automatic peeling machines and reduce the labor cost. Existing methods cannot obtain excellent accuracy in the absence of target samples because there are too many species of shrimp to obtain a complete dataset. In this paper, we propose a tactile recognition method with universal applicability. First, we obtained tactile data, e.g., the texture and hardness of the surface of the shrimp, through a novel layout using the same type of sensors, and constructed fusion features based on the energy and nonstationary volatility (ENSV). Second, the ENSV features were input to an adaptive recognition boundary model (ARBM) for training to obtain the recognition boundary of shrimp with and without shells. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed model was verified by comparison with other tactile models. The method was tested with different species of shrimp and the results were 88.2%, 87.0%, and 89.4%, respectively. The recognition accuracy of the overall, shrimp with shells and shrimp without shells verified the generalizability of the proposed method. This method can help to improve the efficiency of automatic peeling machines and reduce the labor cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Xueshen Chen & Yuesong Xiong & Peina Dang & Chonggang Tao & Changpeng Wu & Enzao Zhang & Tao Wu, 2023. "A Real-Time Shrimp with and without Shells Recognition Method for Automatic Peeling Machines Based on Tactile Perception," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:422-:d:1064894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/422/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/422/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruan, Xuanmin & Zhu, Yuanyang & Li, Jiang & Cheng, Ying, 2020. "Predicting the citation counts of individual papers via a BP neural network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin Yuan & Wei Ji & Qingchun Feng, 2023. "Robots and Autonomous Machines for Sustainable Agriculture Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-4, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anqi Ma & Yu Liu & Xiujuan Xu & Tao Dong, 2021. "A deep-learning based citation count prediction model with paper metadata semantic features," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6803-6823, August.
    2. Fang Zhang & Shengli Wu, 2024. "Predicting citation impact of academic papers across research areas using multiple models and early citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4137-4166, July.
    3. Martorell Cunil, Onofre & Otero González, Luis & Durán Santomil, Pablo & Mulet Forteza, Carlos, 2023. "How to accomplish a highly cited paper in the tourism, leisure and hospitality field," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Wanjun Xia & Tianrui Li & Chongshou Li, 2023. "A review of scientific impact prediction: tasks, features and methods," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 543-585, January.
    5. Jorge A. V. Tohalino & Laura V. C. Quispe & Diego R. Amancio, 2021. "Analyzing the relationship between text features and grants productivity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4255-4275, May.
    6. Zhao, Qihang & Feng, Xiaodong, 2022. "Utilizing citation network structure to predict paper citation counts: A Deep learning approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    7. Shengzhi Huang & Jiajia Qian & Yong Huang & Wei Lu & Yi Bu & Jinqing Yang & Qikai Cheng, 2022. "Disclosing the relationship between citation structure and future impact of a publication," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(7), pages 1025-1042, July.
    8. Yang, Jinqing & Liu, Zhifeng, 2022. "The effect of citation behaviour on knowledge diffusion and intellectual structure," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    9. Li, Xin & Ma, Xiaodi & Feng, Ye, 2024. "Early identification of breakthrough research from sleeping beauties using machine learning," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).
    10. Wang, Xiaoli & Liang, Wenting & Ye, Xuanting & Chen, Lingdi & Liu, Yun, 2024. "Disruptive development path measurement for emerging technologies based on the patent citation network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    11. Kumar, Dhananjay & Bhowmick, Plaban Kumar & Paik, Jiaul H, 2023. "Researcher influence prediction (ResIP) using academic genealogy network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    12. Sun, Zhuanlan, 2024. "Textual features of peer review predict top-cited papers: An interpretable machine learning perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).
    13. Xiaomei Bai & Fuli Zhang & Jinzhou Li & Zhong Xu & Zeeshan Patoli & Ivan Lee, 2021. "Quantifying scientific collaboration impact by exploiting collaboration-citation network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7993-8008, September.
    14. Wumei Du & Zheng Xie & Yiqin Lv, 2021. "Predicting publication productivity for authors: Shallow or deep architecture?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5855-5879, July.
    15. Hu, Zewen & Zhou, Xiji & Lin, Angela, 2023. "Evaluation and identification of potential high-value patents in the field of integrated circuits using a multidimensional patent indicators pre-screening strategy and machine learning approaches," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    16. Croft, William L. & Sack, Jörg-Rüdiger, 2022. "Predicting the citation count and CiteScore of journals one year in advance," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    17. Yi-di Hua & Ke-man Hu & Lu-yi Qiu & Hong-an Dong & Lei Ding & Sio-Long Lo, 2022. "Exploring the interaction relationship between Beautiful China-SciTech innovation using coupling coordination and predictive analysis: a case study of Zhejiang," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 12097-12130, October.
    18. Yuhao Zhou & Ruijie Wang & An Zeng, 2022. "Predicting the impact and publication date of individual scientists’ future papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 1867-1882, April.
    19. Li, Xin & Tang, Xuli & Cheng, Qikai, 2022. "Predicting the clinical citation count of biomedical papers using multilayer perceptron neural network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    20. Akella, Akhil Pandey & Alhoori, Hamed & Kondamudi, Pavan Ravikanth & Freeman, Cole & Zhou, Haiming, 2021. "Early indicators of scientific impact: Predicting citations with altmetrics," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:422-:d:1064894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.