IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i1p199-d1034275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological Revolution in the Field: Green Development of Chinese Agriculture Driven by Digital Information Technology (DIT)

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaowen Dai

    (Sichuan Center for Rural Development Research, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
    College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Yi Chen

    (College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Chunyan Zhang

    (College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Yanqiu He

    (College of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Jiajia Li

    (College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

According to the Plan for Rural Development of Digital Agriculture (2019–2025), accelerated integration of digital technologies and agriculture is crucial to promoting high-quality agriculture in China. The application of DIT in agricultural activities will not only help improve the efficiency of agricultural production, but also promote the green development of agriculture and the achievement of the Dual Carbon Target (DCT). In order to further clarify the comprehensive effects of the application of DIT in agricultural systems and provide routes for government decision-makers to assist in reducing agricultural emissions by DIT, this paper adopts the logical deductive method and starts with the application status to draw out the specific paths of low-carbon transformation in DIT-driven agriculture, while further discussing the potential issues in the process and corresponding solutions. DIT is a double-edged sword. It can promote the green and low-carbon transformation of agriculture by implementing precision operation, environmental monitoring, optimizing carbon emission accounting, and supervising the carbon market. However, at the same time, it may face problems such as unbalanced rural development and excessive financialization of the carbon market. Therefore, we should be optimistic but cautious about the application of DIT in reducing agricultural emissions. We can address potential problems by strengthening government-led investment, broadening channels for capital investment, strengthening skills training for farmers, and enhancing the regulation of trading in carbon sink markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaowen Dai & Yi Chen & Chunyan Zhang & Yanqiu He & Jiajia Li, 2023. "Technological Revolution in the Field: Green Development of Chinese Agriculture Driven by Digital Information Technology (DIT)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:199-:d:1034275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/1/199/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/1/199/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Xianhua & Deng, Huai & Li, Hua & Guo, Yiming, 2021. "Impact of Energy Structure Adjustment and Environmental Regulation on Air Pollution in China: Simulation and Measurement Research by the Dynamic General Equilibrium Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Ben Henderson & Clara Frezal & Eimear Flynn, 2020. "A survey of GHG mitigation policies for the agriculture, forestry and other land use sector," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 145, OECD Publishing.
    3. Zhen Liu & Yiming Wei & Qiuming Li & Jing Lan, 2021. "The Mediating Role of Social Capital in Digital Information Technology Poverty Reduction an Empirical Study in Urban and Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Dani Rodrik, 2014. "Green industrial policy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 469-491.
    5. Samuel Wicki & Erik G. Hansen, 2019. "Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 970-988, September.
    6. Ying Wang & Peipei Shang & Lichun He & Yingchun Zhang & Dandan Liu, 2018. "Can China Achieve the 2020 and 2030 Carbon Intensity Targets through Energy Structure Adjustment?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-32, October.
    7. Ksenia Onufrey & Anna Bergek, 2015. "Self-reinforcing Mechanisms in a Multi-technology Industry: Understanding Sustained Technological Variety in a Context of Path Dependency," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 523-551, August.
    8. Frederico Cruz-Jesus & Tiago Oliveira & Fernando Bacao & Zahir Irani, 2017. "Assessing the pattern between economic and digital development of countries," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 835-854, August.
    9. Perruchas, François & Consoli, Davide & Barbieri, Nicolò, 2020. "Specialisation, diversification and the ladder of green technology development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    10. Andrea Urbinati & Davide Chiaroni & Vittorio Chiesa & Federico Frattini, 2019. "The Role of Business Model Design in the Diffusion of Innovations: An Analysis of a Sample of Unicorn-Tech Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-64, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gilbert Exaud Mushi & Pierre-Yves Burgi & Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo, 2024. "State of Agricultural E-Government Services to Farmers in Tanzania: Toward the Participatory Design of a Farmers Digital Information System (FDIS)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Heng Wang & Yuting Tang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Coupling Coordination between Digital Village and Green and High-Quality Agricultural Development—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Yan Liu & Ya Deng & Binyao Peng, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Financial Inclusion on Green and Low-Carbon Agricultural Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Gongyi Jiang & Weijun Gao & Meng Xu & Mingjia Tong & Zhonghui Liu, 2023. "Geographic Information Visualization and Sustainable Development of Low-Carbon Rural Slow Tourism under Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Lucchese, Matteo & Pianta, Mario, 2020. "Europe’s alternative: a Green Industrial Policy for sustainability and convergence," MPRA Paper 98705, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Prasad Siba Borah & Courage Simon Kofi Dogbe & Michael D. Dzandu & Wisdom Wise Kwabla Pomegbe, 2023. "Forging organizational resilience through green value co‐creation: The role of green technology, green operations, and green transaction capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5734-5747, December.
    4. Olayinka David-West & Oluwasola Oni & Folajimi Ashiru, 2022. "Diffusion of Innovations: Mobile Money Utility and Financial Inclusion in Nigeria. Insights from Agents and Unbanked Poor End Users," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1753-1773, December.
    5. Patrice Bougette & Christophe Charlier, 2019. "Subsidies and Countervailing Measures in the EU Biofuel Industry: A Welfare Analysis," Post-Print halshs-02306022, HAL.
    6. Enrico Bergamini & Georg Zachmann, 2020. "Exploring EU’s Regional Potential in Low-Carbon Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    7. Hellsmark, Hans & Hansen, Teis, 2020. "A new dawn for (oil) incumbents within the bioeconomy? Trade-offs and lessons for policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    8. Jonas Meckling & Jesse Strecker, 2023. "Green bargains: leveraging public investment to advance climate regulation," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 418-429, April.
    9. Hötte, Kerstin & Pichler, Anton & Lafond, François, 2021. "The rise of science in low-carbon energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Ruxu Sheng & Rong Zhou & Ying Zhang & Zidi Wang, 2021. "Green Investment Changes in China: A Shift-Share Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Marin, Giovanni & Vona, Francesco, 2023. "Finance and the reallocation of scientific, engineering and mathematical talent," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    12. Sarah Armitage & Noël Bakhtian & Adam Jaffe, 2024. "Innovation Market Failures and the Design of New Climate Policy Instruments," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 4-48.
    13. Miquel-Flores, Ixart & Reghezza, Alessio & Buchetti, Bruno & Perdichizzi, Salvatore, 2024. "Greening the economy: how public-guaranteed loans influence firm-level resource allocation," Working Paper Series 2916, European Central Bank.
    14. Cui, Li & Chan, Hing Kai & Zhou, Yizhuo & Dai, Jing & Lim, Jia Jia, 2019. "Exploring critical factors of green business failure based on Grey-Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 450-461.
    15. Mealy, Penny & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2017. "Economic Complexity and the Green Economy," INET Oxford Working Papers 2018-03, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, revised Feb 2019.
    16. Zhang, Yijun & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Yi & Jiang, Feitao, 2021. "Can green industrial policy improve total factor productivity? Firm-level evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 51-62.
    17. Chiara Mio & Silvia Panfilo & Benedetta Blundo, 2020. "Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3220-3245, December.
    18. Dahlström, Petter & Lööf, Hans & Sjöholm, Fredrik & Stephan, Andreas, 2023. "The EU’s competitive advantage in the "clean-energy arms race"," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 495, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    19. Jun Wen & Hadi Hussain & Renai Jiang & Junaid Waheed, 2023. "Overcoming the Digital Divide With ICT Diffusion: Multivariate and Spatial Analysis at China’s Provincial Level," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    20. Mario Pianta & Matteo Lucchese, 2020. "Rethinking the European Green Deal," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 633-641, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:199-:d:1034275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.