IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i12p2284-d1301556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solid–Liquid Separation and Its Environmental Impact on Manure Treatment in Scaled Pig Farms—Evidence Based on Life Cycle Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Yijia Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Qinqing Bo

    (Water Conservancy Engineering College, Fujian Coll Water Conservancy & Elect Power, Sanming 366000, China)

  • Xintian Ma

    (State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yating Du

    (State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Xinyi Du

    (State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Liyang Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environment, Ministry of Agriculture/Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yadong Yang

    (State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Recently, there has been a significant focus on the issue of pollution caused by livestock and poultry rearing, which is recognized as a prominent contributor to nonpoint source pollution in the agricultural sector. This study employed the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to evaluate the environmental impact of several pig manure processing scenarios with the aim of determining the appropriate solid–liquid separation tool for large-scale pig farms. The findings indicate that the utilization of a screw extruder for solid–liquid separation in Scenario 2 has a lower environmental impact. In contrast to Scenario 1, Scenario 2 exhibits reduced environmental potential in the areas of global warming, human toxicity, acidification, and eutrophication. Specifically, the global warming, human toxicity, acidification, and eutrophication impacts decreased by 56%, 81%, 83%, and 273%, respectively, due to the implementation of solid–liquid separation. The type of solid–liquid separation equipment used during the processing of swine manure, as well as the subsequent treatment, have a significant impact on environmental emissions. Compared to Scenario 2, Scenario 3, which utilizes a centrifugal microfilter for solid–liquid separation, exhibits a lower environmental impact in terms of human toxicity, resulting in a reduction of 0.736 kg DCB-eq. In general, solid–liquid separation is a viable and environmentally friendly method for the disposal of waste from large-scale pig farms. The adoption of this method is highly recommended. During its implementation, careful consideration should be given to factors such as separation efficiency and pollution emissions. It is crucial to select appropriate equipment for solid–liquid separation to effectively process the waste.

Suggested Citation

  • Yijia Zhang & Qinqing Bo & Xintian Ma & Yating Du & Xinyi Du & Liyang Xu & Yadong Yang, 2023. "Solid–Liquid Separation and Its Environmental Impact on Manure Treatment in Scaled Pig Farms—Evidence Based on Life Cycle Assessment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:2284-:d:1301556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/12/2284/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/12/2284/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Rezazadeh, A. & Kabiri, S., 2020. "A feasibility study on the potential, economic, and environmental advantages of biogas production from poultry manure in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 87-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehrabian, M.J. & Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H., 2023. "4E, risk, diagnosis, and availability evaluation for optimal design of a novel biomass-solar-wind driven polygeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    2. Gonçalves Rigueira Pinheiro Castro, Pedro Henrique & Filho, Delly Oliveira & Rosa, André Pereira & Navas Gracia, Luis Manuel & Almeida Silva, Thais Cristina, 2024. "Comparison of externalities of biogas and photovoltaic solar energy for energy planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Muñoz, P. & González-Menorca, C. & Sánchez-Vázquez, R. & Sanchez-Prieto, J. & Fraile Del Pozo, A., 2024. "Determining biomethane potential from animal-source industry wastes by anaerobic digestion: A case study from La rioja, Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Qian Li & Jingjing Wang & Xiaoyang Wang & Yubin Wang, 2022. "The Impact of Training on Beef Cattle Farmers’ Installation of Biogas Digesters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Dulatbay Yerassyl & Yu Jin & Sugirbaeva Zhanar & Kazambayeva Aigul & Yessengaliyeva Saltanat, 2022. "The Current Status and Lost Biogas Production Potential of Kazakhstan from Anaerobic Digestion of Livestock and Poultry Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-11, April.
    6. Rezazadeh, Ali Akbar & Avami, Akram, 2024. "An integrated policy approach for sustainable decarbonization pathways of energy system in a city under climate change scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. Najafi, Fatemeh & Sedaghat, Ahmad & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Issakhov, Alibek, 2021. "Location assessment for producing biodiesel fuel from Jatropha Curcas in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:2284-:d:1301556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.