IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i10p1900-d1249493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Implementation of Internet of Things (IoT) Platform Targeted for Smallholder Farmers: From Nepal Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ritu Raj Lamsal

    (Telecommunication Engineering School, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain)

  • P. Karthikeyan

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, RV University, Bengaluru 560059, India)

  • Pablo Otero

    (Telecommunication Engineering School, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain
    Institute of Oceanic Engineering Research, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain)

  • Alfonso Ariza

    (Telecommunication Engineering School, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain
    Institute of Oceanic Engineering Research, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain)

Abstract

Nepal, a lower-middle-income country in South Asia, predominantly features smallholder farming communities operating on modest land holdings. These smallholders often adhere to traditional farming methods, relying on familial labor, which has become increasingly inefficient in contemporary agricultural landscapes. To enhance their productivity and efficiency, smallholder farmers require affordable and accessible Internet of Things (IoT)-based systems. However, the prevailing IoT solutions in the market primarily cater to large-scale commercial enterprises, rendering them unsuitable for the specific needs and constraints faced by smallholder farmers. In response to this gap, we have introduced a cost-effective, customizable, scalable, and dependable IoT platform tailored expressly for smallholder farmers. This platform empowers them to visualize, monitor, and control real-time data pertaining to their crops, livestock, and other agricultural assets. To ascertain the efficacy and suitability of our proposed platform, we conducted a comparative analysis with existing counterparts such as Blynk IoT and ThingSpeak IoT, evaluating their respective features and application services against standard requirements. Additionally, we subjected our platform to rigorous server load testing, assessing crucial performance parameters including throughput, response time, user capacity, and data sampling rates. Over an observation period spanning an average of 339 days, our platform successfully processed and stored a substantial volume of data, encompassing 817,633 sensor messages, averaging 2412 messages per day, with a cumulative storage size of 14,238.28 KB. Extrapolating from these results, it is noteworthy that an A0 instance with 20 GB of cloud space can adequately accommodate 200 users at a rate of 100 MB per user, which is adequate for the smallholder needs. Furthermore, the purposed platform was deployed inside a polyhouse to perform off-season grafting of citrus plants. The achieved success rate of 84% closely approached the success rate of 90–95% observed during on-season grafting. These empirical findings, coupled with the extensive data gathered during our research, underscore the reliability and performance of our proposed IoT platform for smallholder farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ritu Raj Lamsal & P. Karthikeyan & Pablo Otero & Alfonso Ariza, 2023. "Design and Implementation of Internet of Things (IoT) Platform Targeted for Smallholder Farmers: From Nepal Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:1900-:d:1249493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/1900/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/1900/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ganesh Thapa & Anjani Kumar & P.K. Joshi (ed.), 2019. "Agricultural Transformation in Nepal," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-32-9648-0, February.
    2. Anish Paul Antony & Kendra Leith & Craig Jolley & Jennifer Lu & Daniel J. Sweeney, 2020. "A Review of Practice and Implementation of the Internet of Things (IoT) for Smallholder Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Raj K. GC & Ralph P. Hall, 2020. "The Commercialization of Smallholder Farming—A Case Study from the Rural Western Middle Hills of Nepal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leokadia N. P. Ndjuluwa & John A. Adebisi & Moammar Dayoub, 2023. "Internet of Things for Crop Farming: A Review of Technologies and Applications," Commodities, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-15, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emma Karki & Akriti Sharma & Brendan Brown, 2022. "Farm mechanisation in Nepal's Terai Region: Policy context, drivers and options," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 287-305, March.
    2. Dao Duy Minh & Nguyen Duy Tai & Le Ngoc Luu Quang & Truong Tan Quan, 2022. "Estimated the Willingness to Pay Levels for the Adoption of the Internet of Things-IoTs Technology: An Empirical Study in Swiftlet Farming in Binh Thuan Province, Vietnam," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(11), pages 1-5, November.
    3. Sadowski, Arkadiusz & Wojcieszak-Zbierska, Monika Małgorzata & Zmyślona, Jagoda, 2024. "Agricultural production in the least developed countries and its impact on emission of greenhouse gases – An energy approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Lija Chandran TV & Mohammed Shahid Abdulla, 2021. "ALS-ORAN 5G: Adapting to Lowpower-WAN & Satellite - Open Radio Access Network in 5G," Working papers 480, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    5. Brown, Brendan & Paudel, Gokul P. & Krupnik, Timothy J., 2021. "Visualising adoption processes through a stepwise framework: A case study of mechanisation on the Nepal Terai," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Abbas Ali Chandio & Fayyaz Ahmad & Ghulam Raza Sargani & Asad Amin & Martinson Ankrah Twumasi, 2022. "Analyzing the effective role of formal credit and technological development for rice cultivation," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 683-711, June.
    7. Koirala, Pankaj & Kotani, Koji & Managi, Shunsuke, 2022. "How do farm size and perceptions matter for farmers’ adaptation responses to climate change in a developing country? Evidence from Nepal," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 188-204.
    8. Wawrzyniec Czubak & Jagoda Zmyślona, 2024. "Possibilities of Changes in Energy Intensity of Production Depending on the Scale of Farm Investments in a Polish Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Raj K. GC & Ralph P. Hall, 2020. "The Commercialization of Smallholder Farming—A Case Study from the Rural Western Middle Hills of Nepal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Parra-López, Carlos & Reina-Usuga, Liliana & Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo & Carmona-Torres, Carmen, 2024. "Functional analysis of technological innovation systems enabling digital transformation: A semi-quantitative multicriteria framework applied in the olive sector," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Rachana Devkota & Helen Hambly Odame & John Fitzsimons & Roshan Pudasaini & Manish N. Raizada, 2020. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Picture-Based Agricultural Extension Lessons Developed Using Participatory Testing and Editing with Smallholder Women Farmers in Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-27, November.
    12. Xingping Cao & Zeyuan Luo & Manli He & Yan Liu & Junlin Qiu, 2021. "Does the Self-Identity of Chinese Farmers in Rural Tourism Destinations Affect Their Land-Responsibility Behaviour Intention? The Mediating Effect of Multifunction Agriculture Perception," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Ruiyu Sun & Siyao Zhang & Tianyu Wang & Jiarui Hu & Junhu Ruan & Junyong Ruan, 2021. "Willingness and Influencing Factors of Pig Farmers to Adopt Internet of Things Technology in Food Traceability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Lija Chandran TV & Mohammed Shahid Abdulla, 2021. "ALS-ORAN 5G: Adapting to Lowpower-WAN & Satellite - Open Radio Access Network in 5G," Working papers 476, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    15. Dana Freshley & Maria Mar Delgado-Serrano, 2020. "Learning from the Past in the Transition to Open-Pollinated Varieties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Ba, Feng & Li, Xiaoyun & Zhang, Yao & Shi, Weiping & Zhang, Pei, 2023. "How human-elephant relations are shaped: A case study of integrative governance process in Xishuangbanna, China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Toritseju Begho, 2021. "Using Farmers’ Risk Tolerance to Explain Variations in Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties in Nepal," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 16(2), pages 171-193, August.
    18. Awais Ali & Tajamul Hussain & Noramon Tantashutikun & Nurda Hussain & Giacomo Cocetta, 2023. "Application of Smart Techniques, Internet of Things and Data Mining for Resource Use Efficient and Sustainable Crop Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    19. Chrysanthos Maraveas & Christos-Spyridon Karavas & Dimitrios Loukatos & Thomas Bartzanas & Konstantinos G. Arvanitis & Eleni Symeonaki, 2023. "Agricultural Greenhouses: Resource Management Technologies and Perspectives for Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-46, July.
    20. Xue Chen & Ye Jin & Shiping Mao, 2021. "How Can Apple Farmers Be Encouraged to Apply Information Technology? The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:1900-:d:1249493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.