IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i8p1201-d885830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomass Fatty Acid Profile and Fuel Property Prediction of Bagasse Waste Grown Nannochloropsis oculata

Author

Listed:
  • Abo El-Khair B. El-Sayed

    (Algal Biotechnology Unit, National Research Centre, Cairo 12622, Egypt)

  • Nashwa A. Fetyan

    (Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12619, Egypt)

  • Farahat S. Moghanm

    (Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, Egypt)

  • Mohssen Elbagory

    (Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Microbiology, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12112, Egypt)

  • Fatma M. Ibrahim

    (Student Academy of Scientific Research & Technology, Cairo 4262104, Egypt)

  • Mahmoud W. Sadik

    (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
    Department of Environmental Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology, Misr University for Science and Technology, Giza 3236101, Egypt)

  • Mohamed S. Shokr

    (Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt)

Abstract

The Chrythophyta alga Nannochloropsis oculata was mixotrophically grown in artificial media enriched with acid-prehydrolyzed bagasse waste as a source of organic carbon. The used growth medium was composed of F2 nutrients, sea salt (22.0 g L −1 ), and bagasse extract dissolved in sterile tap water. All of the determined growth parameters resulted in their maximums, as the alga was fed with 25% F2 growth medium enriched with 10% bagasse extract, while bagasse-extract-free medium engaged the total chlorophyll and carotenes at the expense of dry weight accumulation during the vegetative growth period. On the contrary, the dry weight under induction growth slightly differed among the different employed treatments; however, all the treatments surpassed the control one, and variation was obviously found in the cases of chlorophyll and carotene. A slight increase in oil content (6.19–11.89%) was observed, as the vegetative cells were grown under induction conditions. The fatty acids ranged between C16 and C20, and the proportions of SFA and MUFA increased from a sum of 63.57% to 88.31%, while the PUFA, including linoleic acid, α-linolenic acid, and arachidonic acid, declined from 36.3 to 11.69%. Concerning the fuel properties, the induction-produced oil surpassed the vegetative one.

Suggested Citation

  • Abo El-Khair B. El-Sayed & Nashwa A. Fetyan & Farahat S. Moghanm & Mohssen Elbagory & Fatma M. Ibrahim & Mahmoud W. Sadik & Mohamed S. Shokr, 2022. "Biomass Fatty Acid Profile and Fuel Property Prediction of Bagasse Waste Grown Nannochloropsis oculata," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1201-:d:885830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1201/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1201/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gimpel, Antje & Stelzenmüller, Vanessa & Grote, Britta & Buck, Bela H. & Floeter, Jens & Núñez-Riboni, Ismael & Pogoda, Bernadette & Temming, Axel, 2015. "A GIS modelling framework to evaluate marine spatial planning scenarios: Co-location of offshore wind farms and aquaculture in the German EEZ," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 102-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nam Seon Kang & Kichul Cho & Sung Min An & Eun Song Kim & Hyunji Ki & Chung Hyeon Lee & Grace Choi & Ji Won Hong, 2022. "Taxonomic and Biochemical Characterization of Microalga Graesiella emersonii GEGS21 for Its Potential to Become Feedstock for Biofuels and Bioproducts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-24, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deveci, Muhammet & Cali, Umit & Kucuksari, Sadik & Erdogan, Nuh, 2020. "Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Ho, Lip-Wah & Lie, Tek-Tjing & Leong, Paul TM & Clear, Tony, 2018. "Developing offshore wind farm siting criteria by using an international Delphi method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 53-67.
    3. A.H.T. Shyam Kularathna & Sayaka Suda & Ken Takagi & Shigeru Tabeta, 2019. "Evaluation of Co-Existence Options of Marine Renewable Energy Projects in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Clemente, D. & Rosa-Santos, P. & Taveira-Pinto, F., 2021. "On the potential synergies and applications of wave energy converters: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Qu, Yang & Swales, J. Kim & Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie C. & Wang, Xinhao & Papathanasopoulou, Eleni & Huang, Junling & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Economic trade-offs in marine resource use between offshore wind farms and fisheries in Scottish waters," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Fery Kurniawan & Luky Adrianto & Dietriech Geoffrey Bengen & Lilik Budi Prasetyo, 2023. "Hypothetical effects assessment of tourism on coastal water quality in the Marine Tourism Park of the Gili Matra Islands, Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7959-7985, August.
    7. Richardson, Riley Lindsay & Buckham, Bradley & McWhinnie, Lauren Helen, 2022. "Mapping a blue energy future for British Columbia: Creating a holistic framework for tidal stream energy development in remote coastal communities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Barbara Zanuttigh & Elisa Angelelli & Giorgio Bellotti & Alessandro Romano & Yukiko Krontira & Dimitris Troianos & Roberto Suffredini & Giulia Franceschi & Matteo Cantù & Laura Airoldi & Fabio Zagonar, 2015. "Boosting Blue Growth in a Mild Sea: Analysis of the Synergies Produced by a Multi-Purpose Offshore Installation in the Northern Adriatic, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-50, May.
    9. Jia, Ruru & Gao, Jinwu & Gao, Feng, 2022. "Robust ocean zoning for conservation, fishery and marine renewable energy with co-location strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    10. Stelzenmüller, V. & Letschert, J. & Gimpel, A. & Kraan, C. & Probst, W.N. & Degraer, S. & Döring, R., 2022. "From plate to plug: The impact of offshore renewables on European fisheries and the role of marine spatial planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Zanuttigh, Barbara & Angelelli, Elisa & Kortenhaus, Andreas & Koca, Kaan & Krontira, Yukiko & Koundouri, Phoebe, 2016. "A methodology for multi-criteria design of multi-use offshore platforms for marine renewable energy harvesting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1271-1289.
    12. Foteinis, S. & Tsoutsos, T., 2017. "Strategies to improve sustainability and offset the initial high capital expenditure of wave energy converters (WECs)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 775-785.
    13. Teniwut, Wellem Anselmus & Hamid, Syahibul Kahfi & Makailipessy, Marvin Mario, 2022. "Developing a masterplan for a sustainable marine sector in a small islands region: Integrated MCE spatial analysis for decision making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Di Tullio, Giacomo R. & Mariani, Patrizio & Benassai, Guido & Di Luccio, Diana & Grieco, Luisa, 2018. "Sustainable use of marine resources through offshore wind and mussel farm co-location," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 34-41.
    15. Takvor H. Soukissian & Dimitra Denaxa & Flora Karathanasi & Aristides Prospathopoulos & Konstantinos Sarantakos & Athanasia Iona & Konstantinos Georgantas & Spyridon Mavrakos, 2017. "Marine Renewable Energy in the Mediterranean Sea: Status and Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-56, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1201-:d:885830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.