IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i8p1144-d878493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cowpea Growth and Nitrogen Fixation Performance under Different Mulch Treatments

Author

Listed:
  • Florence M. Masete

    (Risk and Vulnerability Science Center, University of Limpopo, P Bag X1106, Sovenga, Polokwane 0727, South Africa)

  • Lawrence Munjonji

    (Risk and Vulnerability Science Center, University of Limpopo, P Bag X1106, Sovenga, Polokwane 0727, South Africa)

  • Kingsley K. Ayisi

    (Risk and Vulnerability Science Center, University of Limpopo, P Bag X1106, Sovenga, Polokwane 0727, South Africa)

  • Moshibudi P. Mopape-Mabapa

    (Department of Plant Production Soil Science and Agriculture Engineering, University of Limpopo, P Bag X1106, Sovenga, Polokwane 0727, South Africa)

Abstract

Mulching is regarded as the most important of the three conservation agriculture principles in increasing crop yield in the short term. Thus, the main objective of this study was to investigate the impact of mulch type and mulch application rate on biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), physiological and yield responses of cowpea. A multi-locational (two locations) and multi-seasonal (two seasons) study was carried out under rainfed conditions in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Three mulch types ( Moringa oleifera stems; Moringa oleifera leaves and twigs; and Vachellia karroo leaves and stems) were uniformly spread on the surface at four rates (0, 3, 6, 9 t/ha). The application of mulches, regardless of the rate and type, improved cowpea chlorophyll content and agronomic parameters, such as stem diameter and plant height. Grain yield at Syferkuil responded to the mulching effect in both seasons, while at Ofcolaco, differences were only observed in one of the seasons. Cowpea under control discriminated against 15 N more than under mulched treatments, resulting in more than 70% of the nitrogen being derived from air compared to 50% in mulched plots. This study demonstrated that organic surface mulches improved the physiological responses of cowpea and that organic surface mulches with a lower C:N ratio significantly reduced BNF.

Suggested Citation

  • Florence M. Masete & Lawrence Munjonji & Kingsley K. Ayisi & Moshibudi P. Mopape-Mabapa, 2022. "Cowpea Growth and Nitrogen Fixation Performance under Different Mulch Treatments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1144-:d:878493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahlare Mapula Mokgophi & Alen Manyevere & Kingsley Kwabena Ayisi & Lawrence Munjonji, 2020. "Characterisation of Chamaecytisus tagasaste , Moringa oleifera and Vachellia karroo Vermicomposts and Their Potential to Improve Soil Fertility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Cosmas Parwada & Johan Tol, 2019. "Effects of litter quality on macroaggregates reformation and soil stability in different soil horizons," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1321-1339, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel González-Rosado & Luis Parras-Alcántara & Jesús Aguilera-Huertas & Beatriz Lozano-García, 2022. "No-Tillage Does Not Always Stop the Soil Degradation in Relation to Aggregation and Soil Carbon Storage in Mediterranean Olive Orchards," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Zhihong Zhang & Yali Wu & Vi Khanh Truong & Dongguang Zhang, 2021. "Earthworm ( Eisenia fetida ) Mucus Inspired Bionic Fertilizer to Stimulate Maize ( Zea mays L.) Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1144-:d:878493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.