IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i7p1058-d866550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Water Productivity Enhancement and Sustainability Potential of Different Resource Conservation Technologies: A Review in the Context of Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Adnan Shahid

    (Department of Irrigation and Drainage, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
    Agricultural Remote Sensing Lab (ARSL), National Center of GIS and Space Applications (NCGSA), Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Junaid Nawaz Chauhdary

    (Water Management Research Centre, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
    Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Muhammad Usman

    (Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Earth Sciences and Geography, Martin Luther University Halle, 06886 Halle (Saale), Germany)

  • Muhammad Uzair Qamar

    (Department of Irrigation and Drainage, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
    Department of Civil Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Abdul Shabbir

    (Department of Irrigation and Drainage, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

Abstract

Agriculture is the major economic sector in Asian countries and the majority of their population depends on it. In addition to the largest irrigation system in the Indus basin, Pakistan is suffering from water shortages that are affecting the overall crop production of the country. Different resource conservation technologies (RCTs) such as precision land leveling (PLL), raised bed planting (RBP), and different high-efficiency irrigation systems (HEISs) can be opted for better water productivity. In this study, the potential of these RCTs has been explored to enhance production and save irrigation water through their sustainable adoption. Based on studies by different researchers, water savings up to 47% and yield increases up to 35% have been reported under PLL, while water savings up to 50% and about 10–33% yield increases were observed under RBP. Similarly, under different HEISs, water savings up to 80% and yield increases up to 53% have been reported compared with crops sown under conventional farming. Based on the findings of the researchers regarding RCTs, these have been proved as progressive sowing techniques for better productivity under the limited available water scenario. The detailed review in this paper concludes that RCTs resulting in the improvement of gravity irrigation methods, viz., PLL and RBP, have a great potential of adoption and water productivity improvement at the regional scale in developing countries such as Pakistan, while high-cost HEISs can also be promoted at limited scale among progressive farmers for high-value agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Adnan Shahid & Junaid Nawaz Chauhdary & Muhammad Usman & Muhammad Uzair Qamar & Abdul Shabbir, 2022. "Assessment of Water Productivity Enhancement and Sustainability Potential of Different Resource Conservation Technologies: A Review in the Context of Pakistan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1058-:d:866550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1058/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1058/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hobbs, P. R. & Gupta, R. K., 2003. "Rice wheat cropping systems in the Indo-Gangetic plains: issues of water productivity in relation to new resource conserving technologies," IWMI Books, Reports H032646, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Shrivastava, P. K. & Parikh, M. M. & Sawani, N. G. & Raman, S., 1994. "Effect of drip irrigation and mulching on tomato yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 179-184, April.
    3. Yohannes, Fekadu & Tadesse, Teshome, 1998. "Effect of drip and furrow irrigation and plant spacing on yield of tomato at Dire Dawa, Ethiopia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 201-207, January.
    4. Wan, Shuqin & Kang, Yaohu & Wang, Dan & Liu, Shi-Ping & Feng, Li-Ping, 2007. "Effect of drip irrigation with saline water on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) yield and water use in semi-humid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-2), pages 63-74, May.
    5. Aujla, M.S. & Thind, H.S. & Buttar, G.S., 2005. "Cotton yield and water use efficiency at various levels of water and N through drip irrigation under two methods of planting," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 167-179, February.
    6. Chauhdary, Junaid Nawaz & Bakhsh, Allah & Engel, Bernard A. & Ragab, Ragab, 2019. "Improving corn production by adopting efficient fertigation practices: Experimental and modeling approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 449-461.
    7. Chauhdary, Junaid Nawaz & Bakhsh, Allah & Ragab, Ragab & Khaliq, Abdul & Engel, Bernard A. & Rizwan, Muhammad & Shahid, Muhammad Adnan & Nawaz, Qamar, 2020. "Modeling corn growth and root zone salinity dynamics to improve irrigation and fertigation management under semi-arid conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Johnson, Sam H. & Khan, Zahid Saeed & Husain, Ch. Muhammad, 1977. "The economics of precision land leveling: A case study from Pakistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 319-331, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isaac Korku Dorgbetor & Gabrijel Ondrasek & Hrvoje Kutnjak & Ornella Mikuš, 2022. "What If the World Went Vegan? A Review of the Impact on Natural Resources, Climate Change, and Economies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Zenobia Talpur & Arjumand Z. Zaidi & Suhail Ahmed & Tarekegn Dejen Mengistu & Si-Jung Choi & Il-Moon Chung, 2023. "Estimation of Crop Water Productivity Using GIS and Remote Sensing Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chauhdary, Junaid Nawaz & Li, Hong & Akbar, Nadeem & Javaid, Maria & Rizwan, Muhammad & Akhlaq, Muhammad, 2024. "Evaluating corn production under different plant spacings through integrated modeling approach and simulating its future response under climate change scenarios," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Zhang, Huimeng & Xiong, Yunwu & Huang, Guanhua & Xu, Xu & Huang, Quanzhong, 2017. "Effects of water stress on processing tomatoes yield, quality and water use efficiency with plastic mulched drip irrigation in sandy soil of the Hetao Irrigation District," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 205-214.
    3. Gerçek, Sinan & Demirkaya, Mustafa & Işik, Doğan, 2017. "Water pillow irrigation versus drip irrigation with regard to growth and yield of tomato grown under greenhouse conditions in a semi-arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PA), pages 172-177.
    4. Kang, Yaohu & Wang, Ruoshui & Wan, Shuqin & Hu, Wei & Jiang, Shufang & Liu, Shiping, 2012. "Effects of different water levels on cotton growth and water use through drip irrigation in an arid region with saline ground water of Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 117-126.
    5. S.K. Biswas & A.R. Akanda & M.S. Rahman & M.A. Hossain, 2015. "Effect of drip irrigation and mulching on yield, water-use efficiency and economics of tomato," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(3), pages 97-102.
    6. Farhadi Machekposhti, Mabood & Shahnazari, Ali & Z. Ahmadi, Mirkhalegh & Aghajani, Ghasem & Ritzema, Henk, 2017. "Effect of irrigation with sea water on soil salinity and yield of oleic sunflower," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 69-78.
    7. Yang, Danni & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Guo, Ping & Mao, Xiaomin & Tong, Ling & Hao, Xinmei & Ding, Risheng & Niu, Jun, 2020. "Effect of drip irrigation on wheat evapotranspiration, soil evaporation and transpiration in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    8. Russo, David & Laufer, Asher & Bar-Tal, Asher, 2020. "Improving water uptake by trees planted on a clayey soil and irrigated with low-quality water by various management means: A numerical study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Ping Wang & Zhenyong Zhao & Lei Wang & Changyan Tian, 2021. "Comparison of Efficiency-Enhanced Management and Conventional Management of Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton Fields of Northwestern China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Choudhury, B.U. & Singh, Anil Kumar & Pradhan, S., 2013. "Estimation of crop coefficients of dry-seeded irrigated rice–wheat rotation on raised beds by field water balance method in the Indo-Gangetic plains, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 20-31.
    11. Li, Dan & Wan, Shuqin & Li, Xiaobin & Kang, Yaohu & Han, Xiaoyu, 2022. "Effect of water-salt regulation drip irrigation with saline water on tomato quality in an arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    12. Chen, Ming & Kang, Yaohu & Wan, Shuqin & Liu, Shi-ping, 2009. "Drip irrigation with saline water for oleic sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1766-1772, December.
    13. Zhang, Tibin & Zou, Yufeng & Kisekka, Isaya & Biswas, Asim & Cai, Huanjie, 2021. "Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize’s yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    14. Mukherjee, A. & Kundu, M. & Sarkar, S., 2010. "Role of irrigation and mulch on yield, evapotranspiration rate and water use pattern of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 182-189, December.
    15. Zhang, Yuehong & Li, Xianyue & Šimůnek, Jirí & Shi, Haibin & Chen, Ning & Hu, Qi & Tian, Tong, 2021. "Evaluating soil salt dynamics in a field drip-irrigated with brackish water and leached with freshwater during different crop growth stages," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    16. Wang, Haidong & Wu, Lifeng & Wang, Xiukang & Zhang, Shaohui & Cheng, Minghui & Feng, Hao & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Xiang, Youzhen, 2021. "Optimization of water and fertilizer management improves yield, water, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake and use efficiency of cotton under drip fertigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    17. Zhou, Beibei & Liang, Chaofan & Chen, Xiaopeng & Ye, Sitan & Peng, Yao & Yang, Lu & Duan, Manli & Wang, Xingpeng, 2022. "Magnetically-treated brackish water affects soil water-salt distribution and the growth of cotton with film mulch drip irrigation in Xinjiang, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    18. Cheng, Minghui & Wang, Haidong & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Shaohui & Wang, Yanli & Li, Yuepeng & Sun, Xin & Yang, Ling & Zhang, Fucang, 2021. "Water productivity and seed cotton yield in response to deficit irrigation: A global meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    19. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    20. Liu, Meihan & Shi, Haibin & Paredes, Paula & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dai, Liping & Feng, Zhuangzhuang & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Estimating and partitioning maize evapotranspiration as affected by salinity using weighing lysimeters and the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:1058-:d:866550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.