IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i10p1624-d934787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Different Planting Systems on the Bacterial Diversity of Rice Cultivated in Saline Soil Based on 16S rRNA Gene-Based Metagenomic Insights

Author

Listed:
  • Pugazhenthi Davidson Rokins

    (Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, India)

  • Nellaiappan Olaganathan Gopal

    (Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, India)

  • Rangasamy Anandham

    (Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, India)

  • Ramasamy Saraswathi

    (Department of Plant Genetic Resources, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, India)

Abstract

Soil salinity is considered to be a major impediment to the production of rice among other abiotic stresses. In this study, 16S rRNA Illumina amplicon sequencing was performed to characterise the halophilic communities entrapped in rice rhizosphere soil cultivated in different planting systems (conventional, aerobic and System of Rice Intensification (SRI)) under saline conditions. The physicochemical properties and urease, soil dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase and arylsulphatase activity of soil samples were evaluated to understand their influence on the bacterial communities of the soil. Electrical conductivity (EC) of soil was lower in SRI soil samples, while the available major soil nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium) content and soil enzyme activities such as dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, urease and arylsulphatase were higher. A total of 2,516,700 reads were generated by amplicon sequencing of the hypervariable V3–V4 regions of bacterial 16S rRNA gene and were clustered into 273,447 OTU operational taxonomic units. The total number of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) was higher in the conventional soil samples compared to the SRI and aerobic soil samples. Metagenomic analysis revealed that Proteobacteria was the most dominant phyla in all the planting systems followed by Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Chloroflexi. The alpha diversity index was higher in conventional soil samples compared to other samples and more species diversity was found in SRI soil samples. KEGG analysis revealed that bacterial communities in different soil samples showed varied functional properties. The bacterial diversity of saline soil in this study can be utilised to identify microbial communities with biotechnological potential that can be employed for plant growth promotion in saline environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Pugazhenthi Davidson Rokins & Nellaiappan Olaganathan Gopal & Rangasamy Anandham & Ramasamy Saraswathi, 2022. "The Impact of Different Planting Systems on the Bacterial Diversity of Rice Cultivated in Saline Soil Based on 16S rRNA Gene-Based Metagenomic Insights," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1624-:d:934787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1624/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1624/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Senthilkumar, K. & Bindraban, P.S. & Thiyagarajan, T.M. & de Ridder, N. & Giller, K.E., 2008. "Modified rice cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India: Yield gains and farmers' (lack of) acceptance," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 82-94, September.
    2. Stoop, Willem A. & Uphoff, Norman & Kassam, Amir, 2002. "A review of agricultural research issues raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: opportunities for improving farming systems for resource-poor farmers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 249-274, March.
    3. Sinha, Shekhar Kumar & Talati, Jayesh, 2007. "Productivity impacts of the system of rice intensification (SRI): A case study in West Bengal, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 55-60, January.
    4. Bouman, B.A.M. & Peng, S. & Castaneda, A.R. & Visperas, R.M., 2005. "Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 87-105, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berkhout, Ezra & Glover, Dominic & Kuyvenhoven, Arie, 2015. "On-farm impact of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI): Evidence and knowledge gaps," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 157-166.
    2. Noltze, Martin & Schwarze, Stefan & Qaim, Matin, 2013. "Impacts of natural resource management technologies on agricultural yield and household income: The system of rice intensification in Timor Leste," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 59-68.
    3. Graf, Sarah Lena & Oya, Carlos, 2021. "Is the system of rice intensification (SRI) pro poor? Labour, class and technological change in West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. James Sumberg & John Thompson & Philip Woodhouse, 2013. "Why agronomy in the developing world has become contentious," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(1), pages 71-83, March.
    5. Ly, Proyuth & Jensen, Lars Stoumann & Bruun, Thilde Bech & Rutz, Dominik & de Neergaard, Andreas, 2012. "The System of Rice Intensification: Adapted practices, reported outcomes and their relevance in Cambodia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 16-27.
    6. Ndiiri, J.A. & Mati, B.M. & Home, P.G. & Odongo, B. & Uphoff, N., 2013. "Adoption, constraints and economic returns of paddy rice under the system of rice intensification in Mwea, Kenya," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 44-55.
    7. Gathorne-Hardy, Alfred & Reddy, D. Narasimha & Venkatanarayana, M. & Harriss-White, Barbara, 2016. "System of Rice Intensification provides environmental and economic gains but at the expense of social sustainability — A multidisciplinary analysis in India," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 159-168.
    8. Stoop, Willem A. & Adam, Abdoulaye & Kassam, Amir, 2009. "Comparing rice production systems: A challenge for agronomic research and for the dissemination of knowledge-intensive farming practices," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1491-1501, November.
    9. Glover, Dominic, 2011. "Science, practice and the System of Rice Intensification in Indian agriculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 749-755.
    10. Krupnik, Timothy J. & Rodenburg, Jonne & Haden, Van Ryan & Mbaye, Doudou & Shennan, Carol, 2012. "Genotypic trade-offs between water productivity and weed competition under the System of Rice Intensification in the Sahel," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 156-166.
    11. Patel, D.P. & Das, Anup & Munda, G.C. & Ghosh, P.K. & Bordoloi, Juri Sandhya & Kumar, Manoj, 2010. "Evaluation of yield and physiological attributes of high-yielding rice varieties under aerobic and flood-irrigated management practices in mid-hills ecosystem," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(9), pages 1269-1276, September.
    12. Tsujimoto, Yasuhiro & Horie, Takeshi & Randriamihary, Hamon & Shiraiwa, Tatsuhiko & Homma, Koki, 2009. "Soil management: The key factors for higher productivity in the fields utilizing the system of rice intensification (SRI) in the central highland of Madagascar," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 100(1-3), pages 61-71, April.
    13. Abbie Turiansky, "undated". "Collective Action in Games as in Life: Experimental Evidence from Canal Cleaning in Haiti," Mathematica Policy Research Reports b4f3a3ef599b43c6a875d9380, Mathematica Policy Research.
    14. Varma, Poornima, 2017. "Adoption of System of Rice Intensification and its Impact on Rice Yields and Household Income: An Analysis for India," IIMA Working Papers WP2017-02-03, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    15. Islam, Asadul & Ushchev, Philip & Zenou, Yves & Zhang, Xin, 2019. "The Value of Information in Technology Adoption," IZA Discussion Papers 12672, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Christopher B. Barrett & Asad Islam & Abdul Mohammad Malek & Debayan Pakrashi & Ummul Ruthbah, 2022. "Experimental Evidence on Adoption and Impact of the System of Rice Intensification," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 4-32, January.
    17. Varma, P., 2018. "Adoption and the Impact of System of Rice Intensification on Rice Yields and Household Income: A study for India," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275986, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Noltze, Martin & Schwarze, Stefan & Qaim, Matin, 2012. "Understanding the adoption of system technologies in smallholder agriculture: The system of rice intensification (SRI) in Timor Leste," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 64-73.
    19. Krupnik, Timothy J. & Shennan, Carol & Settle, William H. & Demont, Matty & Ndiaye, Alassane B. & Rodenburg, Jonne, 2012. "Improving irrigated rice production in the Senegal River Valley through experiential learning and innovation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-112.
    20. Thakur, Amod K. & Mohanty, Rajeeb K. & Singh, Rajbir & Patil, Dhiraj U., 2015. "Enhancing water and cropping productivity through Integrated System of Rice Intensification (ISRI) with aquaculture and horticulture under rainfed conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 65-76.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1624-:d:934787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.