IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2021i1p40-d714627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agriculture-Food Supply Chain Management Based on Blockchain and IoT: A Narrative on Enterprise Blockchain Interoperability

Author

Listed:
  • Showkat Ahmad Bhat

    (ICE, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan)

  • Nen-Fu Huang

    (Department of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan)

  • Ishfaq Bashir Sofi

    (Gina Cody School of Computer Science and Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada)

  • Muhammad Sultan

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

Abstract

Modern-day agriculture supply chains have evolved from sovereign and autonomous local stakeholders to a worldwide interconnected system of multiple participants linked by complicated interactions, impacting the production, processing, transportation, and delivery of food to end consumers. Regular instances of fraudulent acts reveal a lack of openness in agriculture supply chains, raising worries about financial losses, eroding customer trust, and lowering corporate brand value. To develop an efficient and reliable trading environment, several fundamental modifications in the present supply chain architecture are required. There is broad consensus that blockchain can improve transparency in agriculture-food supply chains (agri-food SCs). Consumers now demand safe, sustainable, and equitable food production processes, and businesses are using blockchains and the internet of things to meet these needs. For enhanced responsiveness in agri-food SCs, new concepts have evolved that combine blockchains with various Industry 5.0 technologies (e.g., blockchain technology, big data, internet of things (IoT), radio frequency identification (RFID), near field communication (NFC), etc.). It is critical to cut through the hype and examine the technology’s limits, which might stymie its acceptance, implementation, and scalability in agri-food supply chains. This study presents Agri-SCM-BIoT (Agriculture Supply Chain Management using Blockchain and Internet of things) architecture to address the storage and scalability optimization, interoperability, security and privacy issues security, and privacy of personal data along with storage concerns with present single-chain agriculture supply chain systems. We also discussed the classification of security threats with IoT infrastructure and possible available blockchain-based defense mechanisms. Finally, we discussed the features of the proposed supply chain architecture, followed by a conclusion and future work.

Suggested Citation

  • Showkat Ahmad Bhat & Nen-Fu Huang & Ishfaq Bashir Sofi & Muhammad Sultan, 2021. "Agriculture-Food Supply Chain Management Based on Blockchain and IoT: A Narrative on Enterprise Blockchain Interoperability," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:40-:d:714627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/40/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/40/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Özalp Özer & Yanchong Zheng & Kay-Yut Chen, 2011. "Trust in Forecast Information Sharing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1111-1137, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanieh Shambayati & Mohsen Shafiei Nikabadi & Sara Saberi & Abbas Mardani, 2024. "A neutrosophic optimization model for supply chain virtualization in the circular economy using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 687-723, November.
    2. Zakaria El Hathat & V. G. Venkatesh & Tarik Zouadi & V. Raja Sreedharan & Arunmozhi Manimuthu & Yangyan Shi, 2023. "Analyzing the greenhouse gas emissions in the palm oil supply chain in the VUCA world: A blockchain initiative," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5563-5582, December.
    3. Alice Villar & Stefania Paladini & Oliver Buckley, 2023. "Towards Supply Chain 5.0: Redesigning Supply Chains as Resilient, Sustainable, and Human-Centric Systems in a Post-pandemic World," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1-46, September.
    4. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    5. Martina Zámková & Stanislav Rojík & Martin Prokop & Simona Činčalová & Radek Stolín, 2022. "Czech Consumers’ Preference for Organic Products in Online Grocery Stores during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Debesh Mishra & Kamalakanta Muduli & Rakesh Raut & Balkrishna Eknath Narkhede & Himanshu Shee & Sujoy Kumar Jana, 2023. "Challenges Facing Artificial Intelligence Adoption during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Investigation into the Agriculture and Agri-Food Supply Chain in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Xiangzhen Peng & Xin Zhang & Xiaoyi Wang & Haisheng Li & Jiping Xu & Zhiyao Zhao, 2022. "Multi-Chain Collaboration-Based Information Management and Control for the Rice Supply Chain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Liukun Wang & Chunjie Qi & Peng Jiang & Si Xiang, 2022. "The Impact of Blockchain Application on the Qualification Rate and Circulation Efficiency of Agricultural Products: A Simulation Analysis with Agent-Based Modelling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Rodney Tai-Chu Sheng & Yu-Hsiang Huang & Pin-Cheng Chan & Showkat Ahmad Bhat & Yi-Chien Wu & Nen-Fu Huang, 2022. "Rice Growth Stage Classification via RF-Based Machine Learning and Image Processing," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Taehyun Ko & Jaeram Lee & Daehyeon Park & Doojin Ryu, 2023. "Supply chain transparency as a signal of ethical production," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 1565-1573, April.
    11. Lovina Yogarajan & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Mohd Helmi Ali & Norlin Khalid & Lokhman Hakim Osman & Syed Shah Alam, 2023. "Exploring the Hype of Blockchain Adoption in Agri-Food Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Aurora González-Vidal & José Mendoza-Bernal & Alfonso P. Ramallo & Miguel Ángel Zamora & Vicente Martínez & Antonio F. Skarmeta, 2022. "Smart Operation of Climatic Systems in a Greenhouse," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Amir Daneshvar & Reza Radfar & Peiman Ghasemi & Mahmonir Bayanati & Adel Pourghader Chobar, 2023. "Design of an Optimal Robust Possibilistic Model in the Distribution Chain Network of Agricultural Products with High Perishability under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Rahal, Imen & Elloumi, Abdelkarim, 2021. "Inventory management of perishable products : a case of melon in Tunisia," MPRA Paper 118028, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panos Kouvelis & Wenhui Zhao, 2012. "Financing the Newsvendor: Supplier vs. Bank, and the Structure of Optimal Trade Credit Contracts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 566-580, June.
    2. Sezer Ülkü & Chris Hydock & Shiliang Cui, 2022. "Social Queues (Cues): Impact of Others’ Waiting in Line on One’s Service Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7958-7976, November.
    3. Susan A. Kayser & John W. Maxwell & Michael W. Toffel, 2014. "Supply chain screening without certification: The critical role of stakeholder pressure," Working Papers 2014-08, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    4. Lorko, Matej & Servátka, Maroš & Zhang, Le, 2023. "Hidden inefficiency: Strategic inflation of project schedules," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 313-326.
    5. Özalp Özer & Upender Subramanian & Yu Wang, 2018. "Information Sharing, Advice Provision, or Delegation: What Leads to Higher Trust and Trustworthiness?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 474-493, January.
    6. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    7. Bin Shen & Hau-Ling Chan, 2017. "Forecast Information Sharing for Managing Supply Chains in the Big Data Era: Recent Development and Future Research," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(01), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Leon Yang Chu & Noam Shamir & Hyoduk Shin, 2017. "Strategic Communication for Capacity Alignment with Pricing in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4366-4377, December.
    9. Leonardo M. Klüppel & Lamar Pierce & Jason A. Snyder, 2018. "Perspective—The Deep Historical Roots of Organization and Strategy: Traumatic Shocks, Culture, and Institutions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 702-721, August.
    10. Pu, Xujin & Zhang, Shiming & Ji, Bowen & Han, Guanghua, 2021. "Online channel strategies under different offline channel power structures," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Guanghua Han & Xujin Pu & Bo Fan, 2017. "Sustainable Governance of Organic Food Production When Market Forecast Is Imprecise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Arvan, Meysam & Fahimnia, Behnam & Reisi, Mohsen & Siemsen, Enno, 2019. "Integrating human judgement into quantitative forecasting methods: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 237-252.
    13. Arcan Nalca, & Tamer Boyaci, & Saibal Ray, 2017. "Consumer taste uncertainty in the context of store brand and national brand competition," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-17-01, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    14. Karen Donohue & Özalp Özer, 2020. "Behavioral Operations: Past, Present, and Future," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 191-202, January.
    15. Sechan Oh & Özalp Özer, 2013. "Mechanism Design for Capacity Planning Under Dynamic Evolutions of Asymmetric Demand Forecasts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 987-1007, April.
    16. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Zhang, Ting, 2023. "Will being an angel bring more harm than good? Altruistic newsvendors with different risk attitudes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1153-1165.
    17. Abdolkarim Sadrieh & Guido Voigt, 2017. "Strategic risk in supply chain contract design," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 125-153, January.
    18. Brosig-Koch, Jeannette & Heinrich, Timo & Sterner, Martin, 2023. "Bilateral communication in procurement auctions," MPRA Paper 117612, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Bicer, Isik & Hagspiel, Verena, 2016. "Valuing quantity flexibility under supply chain disintermediation risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1-15.
    20. Weixin Shang & Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2016. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with a Common Retailer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 245-263, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:40-:d:714627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.