IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i9p867-d632956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biopesticide Evaluation from Lab to Greenhouse Scale of Essential Oils Used against Macrosiphum euphorbiae

Author

Listed:
  • Lana Dunan

    (Université Cote d’Azur, INRAE, CNRS, UMR ISA, 06000 Nice, France
    School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK)

  • Tara Malanga

    (Université Cote d’Azur, INRAE, CNRS, UMR ISA, 06000 Nice, France)

  • Philippe Bearez

    (Université Cote d’Azur, INRAE, CNRS, UMR ISA, 06000 Nice, France)

  • Sylvain Benhamou

    (Université Cote d’Azur, INRAE, CNRS, UMR ISA, 06000 Nice, France
    CNRS, VetAgro Sup, UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Université de Lyon, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
    INRAE, INSA Lyon, BF2I, UMR 203, Universite de Lyon, 69621 Villeurbanne, France)

  • Lucie S. Monticelli

    (Université Cote d’Azur, INRAE, CNRS, UMR ISA, 06000 Nice, France)

  • Nicolas Desneux

    (Université Cote d’Azur, INRAE, CNRS, UMR ISA, 06000 Nice, France)

  • Thomas Michel

    (Institut de Chimie de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, UMR 7272, Parc Valrose, CEDEX 2, 06108 Nice, France)

  • Anne-Violette Lavoir

    (Université Cote d’Azur, INRAE, CNRS, UMR ISA, 06000 Nice, France)

Abstract

Aphids are recognized as a major threat to economically important crops. Their control is predominantly based on synthetic insecticides that are detrimental to human health and the environment. Botanical pesticides based on essential oils (EOs) are a promising alternative. In this study, the entomotoxicity of green anise and fennel EO fumigation was tested on the potato aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae . Three different settings of increasing scale were considered (leaflet, whole plant and greenhouse) to appraise the consistency of EO impact from controlled laboratory to greenhouse production conditions. LC 50 values for green anise and fennel were 6.6 μl L −1 air and 12.2 μl L −1 air, respectively, based on dose-response curves in leaflet experiments but fennel EO induced phytotoxicity. EO efficiency was confirmed at the whole-plant scale. In the greenhouse experiment, fennel EO exhibited greater efficiency than at the laboratory scale equaling green anise EO efficiency but both EOs showed delayed phytotoxicity, illustrating the importance of long-term monitoring. The present study revealed the ability of both EOs to control M. euphorbiae populations under greenhouse conditions and hinted at the importance of assessing EO efficiency in realistic agronomic conditions (e.g., under the fluctuating environmental conditions usually occurring in greenhouses).

Suggested Citation

  • Lana Dunan & Tara Malanga & Philippe Bearez & Sylvain Benhamou & Lucie S. Monticelli & Nicolas Desneux & Thomas Michel & Anne-Violette Lavoir, 2021. "Biopesticide Evaluation from Lab to Greenhouse Scale of Essential Oils Used against Macrosiphum euphorbiae," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:9:p:867-:d:632956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/9/867/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/9/867/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Erb & Nathalie Veyrat & Christelle A. M. Robert & Hao Xu & Monika Frey & Jurriaan Ton & Ted C. J. Turlings, 2015. "Indole is an essential herbivore-induced volatile priming signal in maize," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, May.
    2. Christos A. Damalas & Spyridon D. Koutroubas, 2018. "Current Status and Recent Developments in Biopesticide Use," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-6, January.
    3. Axel Decourtye & Mickaël Henry & Nicolas Desneux, 2013. "Overhaul pesticide testing on bees," Nature, Nature, vol. 497(7448), pages 188-188, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikoletta Ntalli, 2022. "Biopesticides: Naturally Originating Plant Protection Products and Biocides," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-4, July.
    2. Ieva Mežaka & Arta Kronberga & Marta Berga & Laura Kaļāne & Laura Pastare & Gundars Skudriņš & Ilva Nakurte, 2023. "Biochemical and Physiological Responses of Cucumis sativus L. to Application of Potential Bioinsecticides—Aqueous Carum carvi L. Seed Distillation By-Product Based Extracts," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Azucena Gonzalez-Coloma, 2023. "Essential Oils as Biopesticide Ingredients," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-3, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Palermo & Giulia Giunti & Francesca Laudani & Vincenzo Palmeri & Orlando Campolo, 2021. "Essential Oil-Based Nano-Biopesticides: Formulation and Bioactivity against the Confused Flour Beetle Tribolium confusum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Yuying Liu & Ruiling Shi & Yiting Peng & Wei Wang & Xinhong Fu, 2022. "Impacts of Technology Training Provided by Agricultural Cooperatives on Farmers’ Adoption of Biopesticides in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Brassard, P. & Godbout, S. & Hamelin, L., 2021. "Framework for consequential life cycle assessment of pyrolysis biorefineries: A case study for the conversion of primary forestry residues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Jolanta Kowalska & Joanna Krzymińska & Kinga Matysiak & Magdalena Jakubowska, 2022. "Screening for Antagonistic Yeasts to Manage Alternaria spp. in Organic Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Nilanjan Chakraborty & Rusha Mitra & Somrhita Pal & Retwika Ganguly & Krishnendu Acharya & Tatiana Minkina & Anik Sarkar & Chetan Keswani, 2023. "Biopesticide Consumption in India: Insights into the Current Trends," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Paulina Książek-Trela & Ewa Szpyrka, 2022. "The effect of natural and biological pesticides on the degradation of synthetic pesticides," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(4), pages 273-291.
    7. Geraldin M. W. Lengai & Alex M. Fulano & James W. Muthomi, 2022. "Improving Access to Export Market for Fresh Vegetables through Reduction of Phytosanitary and Pesticide Residue Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Jing Li & Ruiyin He, 2021. "Relationships among socioeconomic factors, rice planting method and pesticide use," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7358-7372, May.
    9. Korinna Varga & Judit Fehér & Bence Trugly & Dóra Drexler & Florian Leiber & Vincenzo Verrastro & Jakob Magid & Caroline Chylinski & Spiridoula Athanasiadou & Barbara Thuerig & Anna László & Márta Lad, 2022. "The State of Play of Copper, Mineral Oil, External Nutrient Input, Anthelmintics, Antibiotics and Vitamin Usage and Available Reduction Strategies in Organic Farming across Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-36, March.
    10. Kang, Shijia & Frick, Fabian & Ait Sidhoum, Amer & Sauer, Johannes & Zheng, Shaofeng, 2023. "Does food quality certification improve eco-efficiency? Empirical evidence from Chinese vegetable production," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:9:p:867-:d:632956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.