IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i5p429-d551361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study between the CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Multiplex Gene Editing in Maize

Author

Listed:
  • Chongzhi Gong

    (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Bio-Energy Crops, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Shengchan Huang

    (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Bio-Energy Crops, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Rentao Song

    (State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, National Maize Improvement Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Joint International Research Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Weiwei Qi

    (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Bio-Energy Crops, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

Although the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system has been proved to be an efficient multiplex gene editing system in maize, it was still unclear how CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) system would perform for multiplex gene editing in maize. To this end, this study compared the CRISPR/Cpf1 system and CRISPR/Cas9 system for multiplex gene editing in maize. The bZIP transcription factor Opaque2 ( O2 ) was used as the target gene in both systems. We found that in the T0 and T1 generations, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system showed lower editing efficiency than the CRISPR/Cas9 system. However, in the T2 generation, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system generated more types of new mutations. While the CRISPR/Cas9 system tended to edit within the on-target range, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system preferred to edit in between the targets. We also found that in the CRISPR/Cpf1 system, the editing efficiency positively correlated with the expression level of Cpf1. In conclusion, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system offers alternative choices for target-site selection for multiplex gene editing and has acceptable editing efficiency in maize and is a valuable alternative choice for gene editing in crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Chongzhi Gong & Shengchan Huang & Rentao Song & Weiwei Qi, 2021. "Comparative Study between the CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Multiplex Gene Editing in Maize," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-11, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:5:p:429-:d:551361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/5/429/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/5/429/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blake Wiedenheft & Samuel H. Sternberg & Jennifer A. Doudna, 2012. "RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea," Nature, Nature, vol. 482(7385), pages 331-338, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulaganathan, Kandasamy & Goud, Sravanthi & Reddy, Madhavi & Kayalvili, Ulaganathan, 2017. "Genome engineering for breaking barriers in lignocellulosic bioethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1080-1107.
    2. Rui Wang & Xian Shu & Huiwei Zhao & Qiong Xue & Chao Liu & Aici Wu & Feiyue Cheng & Lingyun Wang & Yihan Zhang & Jie Feng & Nannan Wu & Ming Li, 2023. "Associate toxin-antitoxin with CRISPR-Cas to kill multidrug-resistant pathogens," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Rohan V Koodli & Benjamin Keep & Katherine R Coppess & Fernando Portela & Eterna participants & Rhiju Das, 2019. "EternaBrain: Automated RNA design through move sets and strategies from an Internet-scale RNA videogame," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Vanessa M. Macias & Johanna R. Ohm & Jason L. Rasgon, 2017. "Gene Drive for Mosquito Control: Where Did It Come from and Where Are We Headed?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, September.
    5. Eman A. Ageely & Ramadevi Chilamkurthy & Sunit Jana & Leonora Abdullahu & Daniel O’Reilly & Philip J. Jensik & Masad J. Damha & Keith T. Gagnon, 2021. "Gene editing with CRISPR-Cas12a guides possessing ribose-modified pseudoknot handles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Changshuang Jing & Min Wei & Peng Fang & Rentao Song & Weiwei Qi, 2021. "Pollen-Specific CRISPR/Cas9 System to Increase Heritable Gene Mutations in Maize," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-10, August.
    7. Kashif Ahmad & Ray Ming, 2024. "Harnessing Genetic Tools for Sustainable Bioenergy: A Review of Sugarcane Biotechnology in Biofuel Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:5:p:429-:d:551361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.