IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i3p56-d325691.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Increased Light Intensity on the Acceptance of a Solid Lying Area and a Slatted Elimination Area in Fattening Pigs

Author

Listed:
  • Svenja Opderbeck

    (Institute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 9, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Barbara Keßler

    (Bildungs- und Wissenszentrum Boxberg, Seehöfer Str. 50, 97944 Boxberg-Windischbuch, Germany)

  • William Gordillo

    (Bildungs- und Wissenszentrum Boxberg, Seehöfer Str. 50, 97944 Boxberg-Windischbuch, Germany)

  • Hansjörg Schrade

    (Bildungs- und Wissenszentrum Boxberg, Seehöfer Str. 50, 97944 Boxberg-Windischbuch, Germany)

  • Hans-Peter Piepho

    (Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Eva Gallmann

    (Institute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 9, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Animal welfare labels have been introduced to improve housing conditions in conventional pig systems. Animal welfare should be increased by, e.g. offering a well-accepted and comfortable solid lying area. This study investigates the effect of bright light from an LED spotlight in the slatted area on lying and elimination behavior of fattening pigs. It was tested for two pen designs different in feeder and arrangement of the slatted area with 18 pigs per pen. The study took place in two different compartments (spatial repetition) with two pens of each pen design. The light intensity in the slatted area was increased by two spotlights within one pen of each design as case-control approach. A total of 648 fattening pigs were tested over four and five fattening periods respectively. The lying behavior was assessed by video scan sampling at three different weekdays at three times (morning, noon, evening) on each observation day. On average, the lying area was used by 60–63% of the pigs in the control pens and 67–69% in the spotlight pens. Additionally, a tendential effect of the deviation of the room temperature from the set temperature existed. The fouling of the animals and pen was not affected by the light intensity.

Suggested Citation

  • Svenja Opderbeck & Barbara Keßler & William Gordillo & Hansjörg Schrade & Hans-Peter Piepho & Eva Gallmann, 2020. "Influence of Increased Light Intensity on the Acceptance of a Solid Lying Area and a Slatted Elimination Area in Fattening Pigs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:56-:d:325691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/3/56/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/3/56/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yaqiong Zeng & Dingbiao Long & Bin Hu & Hao Wang & Shihua Pu & Yue Jian & Zuohua Liu & Shunlai Xu, 2023. "Study on Illumination Intensity and Duration of LED Light Sources for a Weaned Piglet House without Natural Light," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, November.
    2. S. Opderbeck & B. Keßler & W. Gordillio & H. Schrade & Hans-Peter Piepho & Eva Gallmann, 2020. "Influence of A Cooled, Solid Lying Area on the Pen Fouling and Lying Behavior of Fattening Pigs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Svenja Opderbeck & Barbara Keßler & William Gordillio & Hansjörg Schrade & Hans-Peter Piepho & Eva Gallmann, 2021. "Influence of Cooling and Heating Systems on Pen Fouling, Lying Behavior, and Performance of Rearing Piglets," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Chengqi Liu & Han Zhou & Jing Cao & Xuchao Guo & Jie Su & Longhe Wang & Shuhan Lu & Lin Li, 2021. "Behavior Trajectory Tracking of Piglets Based on DLC-KPCA," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:56-:d:325691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.