IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v9y2019i3p70-d266736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency and Effectiveness of the European Parliament under the Ordinary Legislative Procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Ani Matei

    (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 010643 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristina Ciora

    (Independent Researcher, 010164 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adrian Stelian Dumitru

    (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 010643 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Reli Ceche

    (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 010643 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In the aftermath of the 2019 European elections, the article tries to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the European Parliament within the framework of the ordinary legislative procedure (co-decision). After defining and formulating the main indicators, the paper analyses the micro- and macro-performance of the European Parliament within the decision-making process from a quantitative-qualitative and a qualitative-quantitative perspective; highlighting the relativizing factors and the responsiveness of the European decision-making process to the Europeans’ needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ani Matei & Cristina Ciora & Adrian Stelian Dumitru & Reli Ceche, 2019. "Efficiency and Effectiveness of the European Parliament under the Ordinary Legislative Procedure," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:70-:d:266736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/3/70/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/3/70/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica, 2001. "European Administration. Normative Fundaments and Systemic Models," MPRA Paper 24187, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Francisco Torres, 2003. "How efficient is Joint Decision-Making in the EU? Environmental Policies and the Co-Decision Procedure," Working Papers de Economia (Economics Working Papers) 05, Departamento de Economia, Gestão e Engenharia Industrial, Universidade de Aveiro.
    3. Francisco Torres, 2003. "How efficient is joint decision-making in the EU?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 38(6), pages 312-322, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristea, Ana Ionela, 2014. "El Espacio Administrativo Europeo en el contexto de la europeización [The European Administrative Space in the context of europeanization]," MPRA Paper 56309, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Ani Matei & Lucica Matei & Diana-Camelia Iancu, 2011. "Socio-Statistical Research on the Internalization of European Administrative Space Principles in the Romanian Public Administration," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Francisco Torres, 2006. "On the efficiency-legitimacy trade-off in EMU," Working Papers de Economia (Economics Working Papers) 36, Departamento de Economia, Gestão e Engenharia Industrial, Universidade de Aveiro.
    4. Matei, Lucica & Matei, Ani, 2010. "The Economic and Social Impact of Public Administration Europeanization," MPRA Paper 24267, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:70-:d:266736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.