IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i3p73-d1598187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Digital Government Maturity Models: Evaluating the Inclusion of Citizens

Author

Listed:
  • Åsa Waara

    (Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden)

Abstract

Digital transformation affects nearly every sector of society and is seen as a strategic approach to addressing evolving demands, including those of citizens, demographic shifts, and skill shortages. To tackle these challenges, governments have begun shifting from a government-centric to a citizen-centric approach, tailoring e-services to citizens’ life events and actively involving them in decision-making processes. Digital government maturity models (DGMMs) are essential tools for assessing digital readiness and guiding transformation, but their attention to citizen-centricity varies significantly. This study examines 18 DGMMs, revealing that 17% do not mention citizens, 33% reference them minimally, and only 50% integrate citizen considerations extensively. This research identifies seven themes where citizens were explicitly addressed in the DGMM, and these themes are maturity stages, areas of focus, enablers, constraints, metrics, insights, and recommendations. Despite the increased policy emphasis on citizen-centricity, gaps remain in translating this into actionable frameworks within DGMMs. This research contributes a thematic matrix and actionable insights to advance citizen-centric approaches, fostering public value creation, transparency, and trust. The findings offer guidance for researchers and practitioners to develop improved frameworks that align digital transformation efforts with citizens’ needs, ensuring inclusive and effective public sector transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Åsa Waara, 2025. "Examining Digital Government Maturity Models: Evaluating the Inclusion of Citizens," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:73-:d:1598187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/3/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/3/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:73-:d:1598187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.