IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i7p145-d1430854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for Messy Communication: A Qualitative Study of Competing Voices of Authority on Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Seth J. Meyer

    (Department of Political Science, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA 02324, USA)

  • Kimberly Wiley

    (Family, Youth, and Community Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

Abstract

While governments, nonprofits, and influencers differ dramatically in their resource availability for social media content creation and their duties to public safety, health, and welfare, all play a role in communication with the public at large. Governments provide for the broader public good and nonprofits and influencers have the opportunity to serve isolated communities vulnerable to social ills and health crises. We explore how these three content creator groups concurrently and independently use social media to provide critical information. We qualitatively coded 1392 posts by governments, nonprofits, and influencers on 6 social media platforms shared across the United States during the 2022 Mpox outbreak. We constructed a framework defining a public health communication progression from chaotic to controlled. The findings indicated that governments can reach minoritized communities to resolve a public health crisis by partnering with nonprofits and influencers trusted by these audiences and, most importantly, practicing flexible control over shared messaging.

Suggested Citation

  • Seth J. Meyer & Kimberly Wiley, 2024. "A Framework for Messy Communication: A Qualitative Study of Competing Voices of Authority on Social Media," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:145-:d:1430854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/7/145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/7/145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arora, Anuja & Bansal, Shivam & Kandpal, Chandrashekhar & Aswani, Reema & Dwivedi, Yogesh, 2019. "Measuring social media influencer index- insights from facebook, Twitter and Instagram," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 86-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muniesa, Rocio L. & Giménez, Carmen G., 2020. "The Importance Of The Loyalty Of Fashion Brands Through Digital Marketing," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 8(3), pages 230-243.
    2. Ki, Chung-Wha (Chloe) & Cuevas, Leslie M. & Chong, Sze Man & Lim, Heejin, 2020. "Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    3. Tafesse, Wondwesen & Wood, Bronwyn P., 2021. "Followers' engagement with instagram influencers: The role of influencers’ content and engagement strategy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Dana Adriana Lupșa-Tătaru & Radu Lixăndroiu, 2022. "YouTube Channels, Subscribers, Uploads and Views: A Multidimensional Analysis of the First 1700 Channels from July 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Barta, Sergio & Belanche, Daniel & Fernández, Ana & Flavián, Marta, 2023. "Influencer marketing on TikTok: The effectiveness of humor and followers’ hedonic experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Pantano, Eleonora & Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios & Devereux, Luke & Pizzi, Gabriele, 2021. "Tweets to escape: Intercultural differences in consumer expectations and risk behavior during the COVID-19 lockdown in three European countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 59-69.
    7. Farivar, Samira & Wang, Fang & Yuan, Yufei, 2021. "Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Lim, Weng Marc & Rasul, Tareq, 2022. "Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 325-342.
    9. Watanabe, Nicholas M. & Kim, Jiyeon & Park, Joohyung, 2021. "Social network analysis and domestic and international retailers: An investigation of social media networks of cosmetic brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    10. Ahmadi, Sadra & Shokouhyar, Sajjad & Amerioun, Motahare & Salehi Tabrizi, Neda, 2024. "A social media analytics-based approach to customer-centric reverse logistics management of electronic devices: A case study on notebooks," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Sharma, Manu & Kaushal, Deepak & Joshi, Sudhanshu, 2023. "Adverse effect of social media on generation Z user's behavior: Government information support as a moderating variable," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Aitor Goti & Leire Querejeta-Lomas & Aitor Almeida & José Gaviria de la Puerta & Diego López-de-Ipiña, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence in Business-to-Customer Fashion Retail: A Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-32, June.
    13. Jihye Kim & Minseong Kim, 2022. "Rise of Social Media Influencers as a New Marketing Channel: Focusing on the Roles of Psychological Well-Being and Perceived Social Responsibility among Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    14. Weismayer, Christian & Gunter, Ulrich & Önder, Irem, 2021. "Temporal variability of emotions in social media posts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    15. Makayla Morales & Alexis Fahrion & Shannon Lea Watkins, 2022. "#NicotineAddictionCheck: Puff Bar Culture, Addiction Apathy, and Promotion of E-Cigarettes on TikTok," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, February.
    16. Hasan, Md Ahsan Ul & Bakar, Azuraliza Abu & Yaakub, Mohd Ridzwan, 2024. "Measuring user influence in real-time on twitter using behavioural features," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 639(C).
    17. Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Chuah, Stephanie Hui-Wen, 2021. "“Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 146-157.
    18. Belanche, Daniel & Casaló, Luis V. & Flavián, Marta & Ibáñez-Sánchez, Sergio, 2021. "Understanding influencer marketing: The role of congruence between influencers, products and consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 186-195.
    19. Matia Torbarina & Lara Jelenc & Ivana Brkljačić, 2020. "Increasing Consumer Engagement on Social Networks: Social Media Influencer’s Followers ‘Like’ to See a Face in a Post," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 32(SI), pages 67-81.
    20. Cabeza-Ramírez, L. Javier & Sánchez-Cañizares, Sandra M. & Santos-Roldán, Luna M. & Fuentes-García, Fernando J., 2022. "Impact of the perceived risk in influencers' product recommendations on their followers' purchase attitudes and intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:145-:d:1430854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.