IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i2p31-d1332251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking the Factors That Motivate Social Entrepreneurs to Engage in Social Entrepreneurship Projects in Tanzania: A Qualitative Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Kalangari Rwehumbiza

    (College of Business Administration, Hongik University, Seoul 121-791, Republic of Korea)

  • Eunjung Hyun

    (College of Business Administration, Hongik University, Seoul 121-791, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Social entrepreneurial ventures thrive on diverse motivations, evolving through stages. This research delved into the dynamic shifts in motivations guiding social entrepreneurs across projects and initiatives in Tanzania. Despite numerous attempts by scholars to study and theorize the motivations of social entrepreneurs, there remains a significant gap in understanding the primary focus of social entrepreneurs’ involvement in various social entrepreneurship projects. This research aimed to address this knowledge gap by exploring the motivations that drive social entrepreneurs in Tanzania to engage in social entrepreneurship ventures. The study specifically investigated the CHEMA and Gongali Model cases. The respondents consisted of 20 social entrepreneurs, with 9 from CHEMA and 11 from the Gongali Model. The findings highlight the influence of personal experiences and backgrounds in establishing innovative social enterprises, emphasizing the importance of achieving successful outcomes. The study suggests that social entrepreneurs are motivated not only by their individual needs and goals but also by the satisfaction derived from witnessing the positive impact of their work on others. Successful entrepreneurship, the study argues, requires a focus on effecting changes at both the macro and micro levels. When the intended purpose of social entrepreneurs is achieved, it serves as a significant indicator of success. The report delves deeper into how these findings influence the overall infrastructure and mindset of social entrepreneurs in Tanzania. This research introduces a novel motivational model and connects it with critical success characteristics in social innovation projects, contributing to the advancement of social entrepreneurship research. Additionally, it proposes fundamental innovations in governance and operations within the field of social entrepreneurship. From the organizational context perspective, the findings contribute to a better understanding of the factors that contribute to the formation and growth of social enterprises in Tanzania.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalangari Rwehumbiza & Eunjung Hyun, 2024. "Unlocking the Factors That Motivate Social Entrepreneurs to Engage in Social Entrepreneurship Projects in Tanzania: A Qualitative Case Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:31-:d:1332251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/2/31/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/2/31/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morris, Michael H. & Santos, Susana C. & Neumeyer, Xaver, 2020. "Entrepreneurship as a solution to poverty in developed economies," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 377-390.
    2. Caroline Njeri Wanyoike & Matilda Maseno, 2021. "Exploring the motivation of social entrepreneurs in creating successful social enterprises in East Africa," New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 79-104, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khaula Alkaabi & Salieu Senghore, 2024. "Student entrepreneurship competency and mindset: examining the influence of education, role models, and gender," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keim, Jan & Müller, Susan & Dey, Pascal, 2024. "Whatever the problem, entrepreneurship is the solution! Confronting the panacea myth of entrepreneurship with structural injustice," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    2. Xuanming Ji & Kun Wang & He Xu & Muchen Li, 2021. "Has Digital Financial Inclusion Narrowed the Urban-Rural Income Gap: The Role of Entrepreneurship in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Shahzad, Umer & Gupta, Mansi & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Rao, Amar & Chopra, Ritika, 2022. "Resolving energy poverty for social change: Research directions and agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Michael H. Morris, 2020. "The Liability of Poorness: Why the Playing Field is Not Level for Poverty Entrepreneurs," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 304-315, September.
    5. Cong Fan, 2024. "Empowering Excluded Groups: a Multi-dimensional Analysis of China’s Anti-poverty Policies Through the Lens of Amartya Sen’s Capability Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14969-14997, September.
    6. Cheng, Zhiming & Tani, Massimiliano & Wang, Haining, 2021. "Energy poverty and entrepreneurship," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Sohel Rana & Lily Kiminami & Shinichi Furuzawa, 2022. "Role of entrepreneurship in regional development in the haor region of Bangladesh: a trajectory equifinality model analysis of local entrepreneurs," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 931-960, October.
    8. Frederik Claeyé & Yosra Boughattas & Erno T. Tornikoski, 2022. "Formation of Social Entrepreneurial Intention: A Qualitative Grounded Approach at the Base of the Pyramid," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Charlene A. Dadzie, 2021. "Reimagining the Global South: Consumer welfare and public policy insights from the United States' Gulf Coast," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 1178-1199, September.
    10. Primo, Marcos André Mendes & Paiva, Ely Laureano, 2024. "Tech hub entrepreneurial training to low-income communities: Evidence from Brazil," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Kaidong Yu & Yameng Zhang & Yicong Huang, 2023. "Entrepreneurship at the Bottom of the Pyramid: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Michael H. Morris & Donald F. Kuratko & David B. Audretsch & Susana Santos, 2022. "Overcoming the liability of poorness: disadvantage, fragility, and the poverty entrepreneur," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 41-55, January.
    13. Su, Yiyi & Song, Jialin & Lu, Ying & Fan, Di & Yang, Miles, 2023. "Economic poverty, common prosperity, and underdog entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    14. Vanitha Prasannath & Rajendra P. Adhikari & Sarel Gronum & Morgan P. Miles, 2024. "Impact of government support policies on entrepreneurial orientation and SME performance," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1533-1595, September.
    15. Wang, Li & Liu, Lihua & Dai, Yunhao, 2021. "Owning your future: Entrepreneurship and the prospects of upward mobility in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    16. Morris, Michael H. & Kuratko, Donald F. & Santos, Susana C. & Soleimanof, Sohab, 2024. "Fear and the poverty entrepreneur: The paradox of failure and success," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 41-54.
    17. Chuan Lin & Haomiao Zhai & Yanqiu Zhao, 2022. "Industrial Poverty Alleviation, Digital Innovation and Regional Economically Sustainable Growth: Empirical Evidence Based on Local State-Owned Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:31-:d:1332251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.