IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i10p252-d1494858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Dynamics of Board-Executive Director Relationships in Nonprofits: A Qualitative Study of Youth-Serving Nonprofits in Utah

Author

Listed:
  • Jaxon Didericksen

    (Department of Social Work, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321, USA)

  • Jayme E. Walters

    (Department of Social Work, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321, USA)

  • Dorothy Wallis

    (Department of Social Work, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321, USA)

Abstract

A functional positive relationship between the executive director (ED) and the board of directors (BOD) is crucial to nonprofits meeting their missions. The present qualitative study sought to identify factors—including traits, behaviors, processes, and experiences—associated with positive relationships between BODs and EDs in youth-serving nonprofits in Utah. Surveys were utilized to identify pairs ( N = 6) of board chairs and EDs who had high relationship satisfaction. Individual semi-structured interviews were employed with each participant. Transcripts were analyzed using two-cycle coding, descriptive and pattern coding in which three themes emerged: (1) Background; (2) Roles; and (3) Leadership. The findings illustrated effectively harness individuals’ professional experiences and skills and can provide essential support and mentoring to the ED. Furthermore, interviews with ED–Board Chair (BC) pairs revealed that holding similar values and motivations for serving and leading in the organization fed into harmonious partnership models and a supportive collaborative environment. A shared leadership approach, guided by set roles and responsibilities and solidified with trust and open communication, resulted in EDs and BCs being satisfied with their counterparts and how their organizations were operating. Findings can guide nonprofits in developing, maintaining, and evaluating relationships and processes related to leadership in nonprofits.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaxon Didericksen & Jayme E. Walters & Dorothy Wallis, 2024. "Understanding the Dynamics of Board-Executive Director Relationships in Nonprofits: A Qualitative Study of Youth-Serving Nonprofits in Utah," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:252-:d:1494858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/10/252/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/10/252/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathleen Buse & Ruth Bernstein & Diana Bilimoria, 2016. "The Influence of Board Diversity, Board Diversity Policies and Practices, and Board Inclusion Behaviors on Nonprofit Governance Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 179-191, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Hinna & Fabio Monteduro, 2017. "Boards, governance and value creation in grant-giving foundations," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(4), pages 935-961, December.
    2. Sandrine Frémeaux, 2020. "A Common Good Perspective on Diversity," Post-Print hal-03232779, HAL.
    3. Tasawar Nawaz, 2022. "How Much Does the Board Composition Matter? The Impact of Board Gender Diversity on CEO Compensation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Veena L. Brown & Erica E. Harris, 2023. "The Association of Female Leaders with Donations and Operating Margin in Nonprofit Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 223-243, June.
    5. Nazliben, Kamil Korhan & Renneboog, Luc & Uduwalage, Emil, 2022. "Social Diversity on Corporate Boards in a Country Torn by Civil War," Discussion Paper 2022-001, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. Kamil K. Nazliben & Luc Renneboog & Emil Uduwalage, 2024. "Social Diversity on Corporate Boards in a Country Torn by Civil War," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 679-706, October.
    7. Li, Huafang, 2019. "Communication for Coproduction: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," OSF Preprints y4q9v, Center for Open Science.
    8. Mary Jane Lenard & E. Anne York & Bing Yu, 2019. "Female Trustees and University Financial Performance," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 60-66.
    9. Ruth Sessler Bernstein & Morgan Bulger & Paul Salipante & Judith Y. Weisinger, 2020. "From Diversity to Inclusion to Equity: A Theory of Generative Interactions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 395-410, December.
    10. Reficco, Ezequiel & Layrisse, Francisco & Barrios, Andres, 2021. "From donation-based NPO to social enterprise: A journey of transformation through business-model innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 720-732.
    11. Tasawar Nawaz, 2022. "What's in an education? Implications of CEO education for financial inclusion," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3741-3753, July.
    12. Elliroma Gardiner, 2024. "What’s age got to do with it? The effect of board member age diversity: a systematic review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 65-92, February.
    13. Elmagrhi, Mohamed H. & Ntim, Collins G. & Wang, Yan & Elamer, Ahmed A. & Crossley, Richard, 2021. "The effect of vice-chancellor characteristics and internal governance mechanisms on voluntary disclosures in UK higher education institutions," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    14. Andrea Melis & Tasawar Nawaz, 2024. "The Impact of CEOs’ Personal Traits on Organisational Performance: Evidence from Faith-Based Charity Organisations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 919-939, April.
    15. Doaa Aly & Muath Abdelqader & Tamer K. Darwish & Arshad Hasan & Anna Toporkiewicz, 2024. "How organizational board compositions lead to a higher job satisfaction: an empirical analysis of US and UK companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 277-289, June.
    16. Ha Thanh Nguyen & Balachandran Muniandy, 2021. "Gender, ethnicity and stock liquidity: evidence from South Africa," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2337-2377, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:252-:d:1494858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.