Author
Listed:
- Pilar Mosquera
(ADVANCE, ISEG—Lisbon School of Economics & Management, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisbon, Portugal)
- Paula C. Albuquerque
(SOCIUS/CSG, ISEG—Lisbon School of Economics & Management, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisbon, Portugal)
- Winnie Ng Picoto
(ADVANCE, ISEG—Lisbon School of Economics & Management, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisbon, Portugal)
Abstract
Organizations that practice Sustainable Human Resource Management are socially responsible and concerned with the safety, health and satisfaction of their employees. Under this sustainability orientation, it is very relevant to analyze whether the sudden transition to e-learning as a strategy of adaptation to the COVID-19 pandemic affected the well-being of faculty. One hundred and two college teachers at a business school in Lisbon completed a web-based questionnaire administrated during the second lockdown due to the pandemic. The questionnaire included the Online Faculty Satisfaction Survey (OFSS) and the Work-Related Quality of Life (WRQoL) questionnaire. We use Partial Least Squares Path Modeling to derive to what extent the satisfaction with online teaching has impacted faculty well-being measured by the quality of working life. Results show that interaction with students, student engagement, flexibility and technology are the most relevant factors to faculty satisfaction with online teaching. Having control at work, good working conditions and general well-being are the most relevant factors for faculty overall well-being. As proposed, faculty satisfaction with online teaching positively and significantly influences faculty general well-being, home–work interface and job and career satisfaction.
Suggested Citation
Pilar Mosquera & Paula C. Albuquerque & Winnie Ng Picoto, 2022.
"Is Online Teaching Challenging Faculty Well-Being?,"
Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:147-:d:955042
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special5:p:269-287 is not listed on IDEAS
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:147-:d:955042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.