IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fmb/journl/v14y2011i2p130-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying Social Objectives Aiming Pollution Control – An Economic Perspective Upon Strategic Management And Project Management

Author

Listed:
  • Oana - Catalina Tapurica

    (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania, Faculty of Management)

  • Florin TACHE

    (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania, Faculty of Management)

Abstract

The paper aims to emphasize certain methods and modern instruments used for quantifying the economic impact of setting-up either pollution control or environment protection related social objectives, in the context of strategic management and project management processes carried out within economic organizations. The paper also underlines that setting-up social objectives in the field of pollution control and environment protection may lead to short-run tangible economic benefits for organizations, in addition to already known long-run benefits for society, consisting in quality improvements of the social life’s parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Oana - Catalina Tapurica & Florin TACHE, 2011. "Quantifying Social Objectives Aiming Pollution Control – An Economic Perspective Upon Strategic Management And Project Management," Review of General Management, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Management Brasov, vol. 14(2), pages 130-138, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:fmb:journl:v:14:y:2011:i:2:p:130-138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.managementgeneral.ro/pdf/2_2011_11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert W. Hahn & Robert E. Litan, 2005. "Counting Regulatory Benefits and Costs: Lessons for the US and Europe," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 473-508, June.
    2. Campbell,Harry F. & Brown,Richard P. C., 2003. "Benefit-Cost Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521528986, January.
    3. Helm, Dieter & Pearce, David W, 1990. "Assessment: Economic Policy towards the Environment," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tertius Greyling & Jeff Bennett, 2011. "Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Protection of Malleefowl in the Lachlan Catchment," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 1099, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    2. Jerry Ellig & Patrick A. McLaughlin, 2012. "The Quality and Use of Regulatory Analysis in 2008," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 855-880, May.
    3. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:1065-1081 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Cave, Jonathan & Gibson, Stephen, 2023. "Primary and secondary legislation – assessing the impacts of rules for making rules," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1486, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    5. Glenn Jenkins & Chun-Yan Kuo & Arnold C. Harberger, 2011. "Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions: Forward, Table of Contents, Preface and Chapter 1 (The Integrated Analysis of Investment Projects)," Development Discussion Papers 2011-01, JDI Executive Programs.
    6. W. Pfaffenberger & U. Scheele, 1992. "Environmental aspects of water price formation. An empirical investigation of the cost of ground water protection," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(3), pages 323-339, May.
    7. Greyling, Tertius & Bennett, Jeffrey W., 2011. "Protecting the Booroolong Frog in the Namoi Catchment: A Cost-Benefit Analysis," Research Reports 107851, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub.
    8. Xavier Delache & Sylviane Gastaldo, 1992. "Les instruments des politiques d'environnement," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 258(1), pages 27-34.
    9. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8324 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Ellig, Jerry, 2016. "Evaluating the Quality and Use of Regulatory Impact Analysis: The Mercatus Center’s Regulatory Report Card, 2008–2013," Working Papers 06878, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    11. Patrick Messerlin, 2004. "Problems of transposition and Members States "screening" process and timetable," Working Papers hal-00973081, HAL.
    12. Djankov, Simeon & Luksic, Igor & Zhang, Eva, 2022. "Technology as deregulation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118882, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Jotzo, Frank & Mazouz, Salim, 2015. "Brown coal exit: A market mechanism for regulated closure of highly emissions intensive power stations," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 71-81.
    14. Debnath, Deepayan & Stoecker, Arthur L. & Epplin, Francis M., 2013. "Impact of Environmental Values on the Breakeven Price of Switchgrass," 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida 142563, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Jacopo Torriti, 2010. "Impact Assessment and the Liberalization of the EU Energy Markets: Evidence‐Based Policy‐Making or Policy‐Based Evidence‐Making?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 1065-1081, September.
    16. Stuart Shapiro, 2011. "Defragmenting the Regulatory Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 893-901, June.
    17. Galindo, Luis Miguel & Samaniego, Joseluis, 2010. "The economics of climate change in Latin America and the Caribbean: stylized facts," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    18. Laura Cavallo & Giuseppe Coco & Mario Martelli, 2009. "Evaluating administrative burdens through SCM: some indications from the Italian experience," SERIES 0023, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza - Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", revised Apr 2009.
    19. Claire A. Dunlop & Martino Maggetti & Claudio M. Radaelli & Duncan Russel, 2012. "The many uses of regulatory impact assessment: A meta‐analysis of EU and UK cases," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 23-45, March.
    20. Crabbé, Philippe, 1990. "Les économistes doivent-ils se mettre au vert?," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 66(3), pages 285-304, septembre.
    21. Niek Mouter & Jan Annema & Bert Wee, 2015. "Managing the insolvable limitations of cost-benefit analysis: results of an interview based study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 277-302, March.
    22. Angelo Bencivenga & Margaretha Breil & Mariaester Cassinelli & Livio Chiarullo & Annalisa Percoco, 2012. "The Possibilities for the Development of Tourism in the Appennino Lucano Val d'Agri Lagonegrese National Park: A Participative Qualitative-Quantitative Approach," Working Papers 2012.30, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social objectives; pollution control; project management; strategic management; environment protection.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • O22 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Project Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fmb:journl:v:14:y:2011:i:2:p:130-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: George Maniu The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask George Maniu to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fbuspro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.