IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fau/fauart/v60y2010i4p294-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Excessive Risk-Taking in Banking

Author

Abstract

In this paper the authors propose a new approach to the assessment of excessive risk-taking by a banking sector. They use the portfolio approach to assess the optimal risk-return combination of a bank’s portfolio, based on data for 32 categories of loans. It provides a benchmark for the optimality of the bank’s portfolio. The authors apply this method on an exhaustive sample of Czech banks for the period January 2005–February 2008. They observe an average excess of risk-taking of 33% of the optimal risk and a slight reduction of this excess risk over the analyzed period.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiri Podpiera & Laurent Weill, 2010. "Measuring Excessive Risk-Taking in Banking," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 60(4), pages 294-306, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:fau:fauart:v:60:y:2010:i:4:p:294-306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.fsv.cuni.cz/storage/1189_str_294_306_-_weill-podpiera.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Podpiera, Jiri & Weill, Laurent, 2008. "Bad luck or bad management? Emerging banking market experience," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 135-148, June.
    2. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 77-91, March.
    3. Anca Pruteanu-Podpiera & Jiří Podpiera, 2008. "The Czech transition banking sector instability: the role of operational cost management," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 209-219, September.
    4. Berger, Allen N. & DeYoung, Robert, 1997. "Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 849-870, June.
    5. Guttentag, Jack & Herring, Richard, 1984. "Credit Rationing and Financial Disorder," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1359-1382, December.
    6. Hoggarth, Glenn & Reis, Ricardo & Saporta, Victoria, 2002. "Costs of banking system instability: Some empirical evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 825-855, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Hanousek & Evžen Kočenda, 2017. "Dopady vlastnické struktury, firemních charakteristik a krize na efektivitu českých podniků [Impact of Ownership Type, Firm Characteristics and Crisis on Efficiency of the Czech Firms]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(1), pages 3-25.
    2. Jan Hanousek & Evžen Kočenda & Anastasiya Shamshur, 2014. "Efektivita evropských firem [Efficiency of European Firms]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(3), pages 303-322.
    3. Diana Zigraiova, 2015. "Management Board Composition of Banking Institutions and Bank Risk-Taking: The Case of the Czech Republic," Working Papers 2015/14, Czech National Bank.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:zbw:bofitp:2013_028 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Pessarossi, Pierre & Weill, Laurent, 2013. "Do capital requirements affect bank efficiency? Evidence from China," BOFIT Discussion Papers 28/2013, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    3. Pessarossi, Pierre & Weill, Laurent, 2013. "Do capital requirements affect bank efficiency? Evidence from China," BOFIT Discussion Papers 28/2013, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    4. Pessarossi, Pierre & Weill, Laurent, 2015. "Do capital requirements affect cost efficiency? Evidence from China," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 119-127.
    5. Roman Horváth, 2009. "The Determinants of the Interest Rate Margins of Czech Banks," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 59(2), pages 128-136, June.
    6. Didar Erdinç & Andrey Gurov, 2016. "The Effect of Regulatory and Risk Management Advancement on Non-Performing Loans in European Banking, 2000–2011," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 22(3), pages 249-262, August.
    7. Katuka, Blessing, 2017. "Credit risk dynamics in listed local banks in Zimbabwe (2009-2013)," MPRA Paper 92687, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2017.
    8. Shinta Amalina Hazrati Havidz & Chandra Setiawan, 2015. "Bank Efficiency and Non-Performing Financing (NPF) in the Indonesian Islamic Banks," Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(3), pages 61-79, September.
    9. Said-Nour Samake, 2022. "Prudential Regulation and Bank Efficiency : Evidence from WAEMU Zone," Working Papers hal-03540209, HAL.
    10. Davis, E. Philip & Karim, Dilruba, 2008. "Comparing early warning systems for banking crises," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 89-120, June.
    11. Piotr Wdowiński, 2014. "Makroekonomiczne czynniki ryzyka kredytowego w sektorze bankowym w Polsce," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 55-77.
    12. Enkhzaya Demid, 2021. "Heterogeneity in the Relationship Between NPLs and Real Economy: Evidence from the Mongolian Banking System," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 10(2), pages 133-155.
    13. Kolliopoulos, Athanasios, 2021. "Reforming the Greek financial system: a decade of failure," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108523, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Partovi, Elmira & Matousek, Roman, 2019. "Bank efficiency and non-performing loans: Evidence from Turkey," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 287-309.
    15. Dimitrios Anastasiou & Zacharias Bragoudakis & Ioannis Malandrakis, 2019. "Non-performing loans, governance indicators and systemic liquidity risk: evidence from Greece," Working Papers 260, Bank of Greece.
    16. Love, Inessa & Turk Ariss, Rima, 2014. "Macro-financial linkages in Egypt: A panel analysis of economic shocks and loan portfolio quality," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 158-181.
    17. Ebrahimi Kahou, Mahdi & Lehar, Alfred, 2017. "Macroprudential policy: A review," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-105.
    18. Kowalewski, Oskar & Pisany, Paweł, 2023. "The rise of fintech: A cross-country perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    19. Maryem Naili & Younes Lahrichi, 2022. "The determinants of banks' credit risk: Review of the literature and future research agenda," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 334-360, January.
    20. Imad Jabbouri & Maryem Naili, 2020. "Determinants of Nonperforming Loans in Emerging Markets: Evidence from the MENA Region," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-33, February.
    21. Liu, An-Chi & Kuo, Shew-Huei & Guo, Chao-Ling & Li, Yang, 2024. "Sustainable finance analysis of commercial banks in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bank; financial stability; risk-taking; transition countries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • P20 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fau:fauart:v:60:y:2010:i:4:p:294-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Svarcova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/icunicz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.