IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/macoma/vhtml10.3280-maco2024-002002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating ESG issue into performance management system: An analysis of Italian Context

Author

Listed:
  • Salvatore Principale
  • Daniela Cicchini
  • Luigi Andrea Carello
  • Rubina Michela Galeotti

Abstract

The attention of regulators and stakeholders toward environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues has consolidated in recent years. In this context, compa-nies have to, on the one hand, manage ESG risks and on the other hand, face the greater information needs required by stakeholders and political policymakers. The management of ESG phenomena and better transparency of information, by companies must integrate ESG factors between metrics and performance man-agement systems. This work aims to identify the drivers that favour the integration of ESG indicators in performance management systems. A panel analysis was per-formed in the period 2018-2021 on a sample of 104 listed Italian companies. The results show that some factors such as environmental sensitivity and the presence of State-Owned Enterprises are factors that could incentivized the integration of ESG metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvatore Principale & Daniela Cicchini & Luigi Andrea Carello & Rubina Michela Galeotti, 2024. "Integrating ESG issue into performance management system: An analysis of Italian Context," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(2), pages 15-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2024-002002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=76127&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matteo Pozzoli & Marcello Raffaele, 2022. "Non-financial information and company market value," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2 Suppl.), pages 167-187.
    2. Eng, L. L. & Mak, Y. T., 2003. "Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 325-345.
    3. Mary-Anne McNally & Dannielle Cerbone & Warren Maroun, 2017. "Exploring the challenges of preparing an integrated report," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(4), pages 481-504, October.
    4. Ali Meftah Gerged & Khaldoon Albitar & Lara Al‐Haddad, 2023. "Corporate environmental disclosure and earnings management—The moderating role of corporate governance structures," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2789-2810, July.
    5. Stephen Brammer & Stephen Pavelin, 2006. "Voluntary Environmental Disclosures by Large UK Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7-8), pages 1168-1188.
    6. Stephen Jollands & Chris Akroyd & Norio Sawabe, 2018. "Management controls and pressure groups: the mediation of overflows," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(6), pages 1644-1667, August.
    7. Stephen Brammer & Stephen Pavelin, 2006. "Voluntary Environmental Disclosures by Large UK Companies," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7‐8), pages 1168-1188, September.
    8. Blackwell, DW & Noland, TR & Winters, DB, 1998. "The value of auditor assurance: Evidence from loan pricing," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 57-70.
    9. Paola Ferretti & Cristina Gonnella & Pierluigi Martino, 2024. "Integrating sustainability in management control systems: an exploratory study on Italian banks," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(7), pages 1-34, January.
    10. Yan Ye & Kongyue Li, 2021. "Impact of family involvement on internal and external corporate social responsibilities: Evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 352-365, January.
    11. Irene Eleonora Lisi & Antonella Cifalin?, 2017. "Exploring the use of Social and Environmental Performance Indicators by European companies," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(3), pages 53-54.
    12. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    13. Antonio Duréndez & Julio Dieguez-Soto & Antonia Madrid-Guijarro, 2023. "The influence of CEO’s financial literacy on SMEs technological innovation: the mediating effects of MCS and risk-taking," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Giovanna Michelon & Antonio Parbonetti, 2012. "The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(3), pages 477-509, August.
    15. Husam Aldamen & Keith Duncan & Simone Kelly & Ray McNamara & Stephan Nagel, 2012. "Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(4), pages 971-1000, December.
    16. Daniela Argento & Giuseppe Grossi & Kamilla Persson & Theres Vingren, 2019. "Sustainability disclosures of hybrid organizations: Swedish state-owned enterprises," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(4), pages 505-533, August.
    17. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    18. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-10-2016-2747 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Busco, Cristiano & Malafronte, Irma & Pereira, John & Starita, Maria Grazia, 2019. "The determinants of companies’ levels of integration: Does one size fit all?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 277-298.
    20. Stephen Gates & Christophe Germain, 2010. "Integrating sustainability measures into strategic performance measurement systems: An empirical study," Post-Print hal-00771143, HAL.
    21. Rahat Munir & Kevin Baird, 2016. "Influence of institutional pressures on performance measurement systems," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 106-128, June.
    22. Carol A. Adams & Abdullah M. Alhamood & Xinwu He, 2022. "The development and implementation of GRI Standards: practice and policy issues," Chapters, in: Carol A. Adams (ed.), Handbook of Accounting and Sustainability, chapter 3, pages 26-43, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    23. Massimiliano Bonacchi & Leonardo Rinaldi, 2007. "DartBoards and Clovers as new tools in sustainability planning and control," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(7), pages 461-473, November.
    24. Giuseppe Nicol? & Gianluca Zanellato & Francesca Manes-Rossi & Adriana Tiron-Tudor, 2019. "Beyond Financial Reporting. Integrated Reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the context of European state-owned enterprises," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(2), pages 43-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. MuiChing Chan & John Watson & David Woodliff, 2014. "Corporate Governance Quality and CSR Disclosures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 59-73, November.
    2. Nicola Cucari & Salvatore Esposito De Falco & Beatrice Orlando, 2018. "Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 250-266, May.
    3. Renata Konadu & Gabriel Sam Ahinful & Samuel Owusu-Agyei, 2021. "Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: does stakeholder engagement matter?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 269-289, September.
    4. Walid Ben‐Amar & Philip McIlkenny, 2015. "Board Effectiveness and the Voluntary Disclosure of Climate Change Information," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 704-719, December.
    5. Fan, Hanlu & Tang, Qingliang & Pan, Lipeng, 2021. "An international study of carbon information asymmetry and independent carbon assurance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    6. Akbas Halil Emre, 2016. "The Relationship Between Board Characteristics and Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from Turkish Listed Companies," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 7-19, December.
    7. Akshita Arora & Khaoula Aliani, 2024. "Nexus between corporate environmental disclosures and gender diversity: Interaction effects of board independence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1113-1128, February.
    8. Chenxi Wang & Xincai Deng & Susana Álvarez-Otero & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Ubaldo Comite & Jacob Cherian & Judit Oláh, 2021. "Impact of Women and Independent Directors on Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Nazim Hussain & Sana‐Akbar Khan & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero, 2022. "Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Examining the role of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 89-106, January.
    10. Nazim Hussain & Ugo Rigoni & René P. Orij, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 411-432, May.
    11. Liao, Lin & Luo, Le & Tang, Qingliang, 2015. "Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 409-424.
    12. Samaha, Khaled & Khlif, Hichem & Hussainey, Khaled, 2015. "The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 13-28.
    13. Ishmael Tingbani & Lyton Chithambo & Venancio Tauringana & Nikolaos Papanikolaou, 2020. "Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2194-2210, September.
    14. Zhang, Chenyu & Qian, Aimin & Lou, Xu & Zhang, Guiling, 2024. "The politics of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1406-1428.
    15. Mihai Carp & Leontina Păvăloaia & Mihai-Bogdan Afrăsinei & Iuliana Eugenia Georgescu, 2019. "Is Sustainability Reporting a Business Strategy for Firm’s Growth? Empirical Study on the Romanian Capital Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Liu, Chengyun & Su, Kun & Zhang, Miaomiao, 2021. "Water disclosure and financial reporting quality for social changes: Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    17. Hichem Khlif & Kamran Ahmed & Mohsen Souissi, 2017. "Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure: A synthesis of empirical studies," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(3), pages 376-403, August.
    18. Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem & Khalid M. Alharbi & Nadiah A. Baghdadi & Amer Malki, 2023. "Exploring the Impact of Private Companies’ Participation in Health-Related Programs through Corporate Sustainable Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Mahmoudian, Fereshteh & Lu, Jing & Yu, Dongning & Nazari, Jamal A. & Herremans, Irene M., 2021. "Inter-and intra-organizational stakeholder arrangements in carbon management accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    20. Rainer Lueg, 2022. "Constructs for Assessing Integrated Reports—Testing the Predictive Validity of a Taxonomy for Organization Size, Industry, and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2024-002002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.