IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/macoma/vhtml10.3280-maco2024-001004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Le Istituzioni Scolastiche Pubbliche alla prova della prima Rendicontazione Sociale prevista dal Sistema Nazionale di Valutazione

Author

Listed:
  • Domenico Raucci
  • Manuela Paolini
  • Grazia Di Pietro

Abstract

The recent reforms in the public-school context have been characterized by the diffusion of performance evaluation and self-evaluation systems that have im-pacted the traditional School Accountability (SA) processes. The D.P.R.80/2013 has introduced the ?National Evaluation System? which requires public schools to account for their performance to the community through the publication of a So-cial Report (SR). So far, the research that has dealt with social reporting practices in public schools is still limited. This study presents a content analysis of the SR produced by a sample of 76 Italian public schools in the first year of the adoption of the D.P.R.80/2013. The purpose is to verify the level of detail of the contents reported based on the legislation. The results show a low level of this content (around 32%) highlighting an approach to social reporting in schools limited to the mere ?return of results? and typical of traditional administrative accountability logic. In these perspectives, the work contributes to the SA literature and more spe-cifically to the research streams on social reporting processes in public schools.

Suggested Citation

  • Domenico Raucci & Manuela Paolini & Grazia Di Pietro, 2024. "Le Istituzioni Scolastiche Pubbliche alla prova della prima Rendicontazione Sociale prevista dal Sistema Nazionale di Valutazione," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(1), pages 63-85.
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2024-001004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=75453&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luciano Marchi, 2015. "Editoriale. Nuove prospettive di ricerca sulle tematiche di Management Control," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(3), pages 5-8.
    2. Bracci, Enrico, 2009. "Autonomy, responsibility and accountability in the Italian school system," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 293-312.
    3. Eric A. Hanushek & Margaret E. Raymond, 2005. "Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 297-327.
    4. Carlotta Del Sordo & Federica Farneti & James Guthrie & Silvia Pazzi & Benedetta Siboni, 2016. "Social reports in Italian universities: disclosures and preparers’ perspective," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 91-110, April.
    5. Jacob, Brian A., 2005. "Accountability, incentives and behavior: the impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(5-6), pages 761-796, June.
    6. Malcolm Smith & Richard J. Taffler, 2000. "The chairman’s statement ‐ A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(5), pages 624-647, December.
    7. Domenico Raucci & Stefano Agostinone & Lara Tarquinio & Agnese Rapposelli, 2019. "Exploring the social reporting practices of public schools: survey and cluster analysis of the Italian educational system," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 381-403, October.
    8. Riccardo Mussari & Patrizio Monfardini, 2010. "Practices of Social Reporting in Public Sector and Non-profit Organizations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 487-492, July.
    9. Kim, Jonghun, 2018. "School accountability and standard-based education reform: The recall of social efficiency movement and scientific management," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 80-87.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richardson, J.T., 2015. "Accountability incentives and academic achievement: Distributional impacts of accountability when standards are set low," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-16.
    2. Seth Gershenson, 2016. "Performance Standards and Employee Effort: Evidence From Teacher Absences," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 615-638, June.
    3. Feng, Li & Figlio, David & Sass, Tim, 2018. "School accountability and teacher mobility," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-17.
    4. Derek Neal, 2011. "The Design of Performance Pay in Education," NBER Working Papers 16710, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Gershenson, Seth & Holt, Stephen B. & Papageorge, Nicholas W., 2015. "Who Believes in Me? The Effect of Student-Teacher Demographic Match on Teacher Expectations," IZA Discussion Papers 9202, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Derek Neal & Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, 2010. "Left Behind by Design: Proficiency Counts and Test-Based Accountability," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 92(2), pages 263-283, May.
    7. Hemelt, Steven W., 2011. "Performance effects of failure to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP): Evidence from a regression discontinuity framework," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 702-723, August.
    8. Jon Marius Vaag Iversen & Hans Bonesr�nning, 2013. "Disadvantaged students in the early grades: will smaller classes help them?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 305-324, September.
    9. Shao-Hsun Keng, 2016. "The Effect of a Stricter Academic Dismissal Policy on Course Selection, Student Effort, and Grading Leniency," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 11(2), pages 203-224, Spring.
    10. Craig, Steven G. & Imberman, Scott A. & Perdue, Adam, 2015. "Do administrators respond to their accountability ratings? The response of school budgets to accountability grades," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 55-68.
    11. Alvarez, Jesus & Moreno, Vicente Garcia & Patrinos, Harry Anthony, 2007. "Institutional effects as determinants of learning outcomes : exploring state variations in Mexico," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4286, The World Bank.
    12. Mansfield, Jonathan & Slichter, David, 2021. "The Long-Run Effects of Consequential School Accountability," IZA Discussion Papers 14503, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Yusuke Jinnai, 2016. "The Effects of a Teacher Performance-Pay Program on Student Achievement: A Regression Discontinuity Approach," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(2), pages 993-999.
    14. Reback, Randall, 2008. "Teaching to the rating: School accountability and the distribution of student achievement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(5-6), pages 1394-1415, June.
    15. Craig, Steven G. & Imberman, Scott A. & Perdue, Adam, 2013. "Does it pay to get an A? School resource allocations in response to accountability ratings," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 30-42.
    16. Gregg, John J. & Lavertu, Stéphane, 2023. "Test-based accountability and educational equity: Breaking through local district politics?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    17. Jon Marius Vaag Iversen, 2013. "School accountability reforms and the use of special education," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 264-280, July.
    18. Bokhari, Farasat A.S. & Schneider, Helen, 2011. "School accountability laws and the consumption of psychostimulants," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 355-372, March.
    19. Erwin Ooghe & Erik Schokkaert, 2016. "School accountability: can we reward schools and avoid pupil selection?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(2), pages 359-387, February.
    20. Nunes, Luis C. & Reis, Ana Balcão & Seabra, Carmo, 2015. "The publication of school rankings: A step toward increased accountability?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 15-23.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2024-001004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.