IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/ededed/vhtml10.3280-ed2013-001003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L?Enterprise Architecture e la gestione del patrimonio informativo aziendale

Author

Listed:
  • Valeria Traversi
  • Roberto Ruggieri

Abstract

La gestione del patrimonio informativo e la difficolt? di comunicazione tra le business unit, rappresentano criticit? che, se gestite non correttamente, possono condurre l?impresa al mancato raggiungimento dei propri obiettivi in termini di efficacia ed efficienza. Il presente lavoro si propone di dimostrare l?importanza che assumono, per l?impresa, gli strumenti di Enterprise Architecture (EA) ed il vantaggio competitivo conseguibile attraverso il loro corretto utilizzo. Gli strumenti di Enterprise Architecture, attraverso l?introduzione di un repository integrato e flessibile, generano un modello evoluto di gestione delle informazioni aziendali. Il Magic Quadrant di Gartner, pietra angolare da cui trae origine lo studio condotto, classifica le aziende operanti in questo settore, in quattro tipologie: - Leaders; - Challengers; - Visionaries; - Giocatori di nicchia. Un?attenta analisi ? stata successivamente condotta in riferimento ai vantaggi correlati alla selezione di specifici software considerati utili a chiarire gli effetti che derivano dall?introduzione di strumenti di EA nelle aziende. Il metodo di ricerca utilizzato si estrinseca in uno studio della letteratura di settore e nella selezione di un caso studio, rappresentazione esaustiva dell?utilizzo del software all?interno di una grande realt? aziendale. Nello specifico ? stata selezionata un? importante impresa, Axa - Monte dei Paschi di Siena. Il risultato atteso ? legato alla possibilit? di offrire alle aziende spunti interessanti per favorire il Made in Italy nella crescita e nello sviluppo di soluzioni che stimolino ed aumentino il vantaggio competitivo e la capacit? di ottimizzazione delle risorse interne ed esterne all?impresa

Suggested Citation

  • Valeria Traversi & Roberto Ruggieri, 2013. "L?Enterprise Architecture e la gestione del patrimonio informativo aziendale," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 49-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:ededed:v:html10.3280/ed2013-001003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=49216&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerrit Versteeg & Harry Bouwman, 2006. "Business architecture: A new paradigm to relate business strategy to ICT," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 91-102, February.
    2. Maynard, Leigh J. & Liu, Deyu, 1999. "Fragility In Dairy Product Demand Analysis," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21679, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pofahl, Geoffrey M. & Capps, Oral, Jr. & Clauson, Annette L., 2005. "Demand for Non-Alcoholic Beverages: Evidence From The ACNielsen Home Scan Panel," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19441, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Stockton, Matthew C. & Capps, Oral Jr., 2005. "Nerlovian Hedonic Models For Three Different Container Sizes Of Fluid Milk," A.E. Research Series 305038, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    3. Stockton, Matthew C. & Capps, Oral, Jr., 2005. "Demand System Analysis With Emphasis On Container Sizes Of Non-Alcoholic Beverages," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19137, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Maynard, Leigh J. & Veeramani, Venkat N., 2003. "Price Sensitivities for U.S. Frozen Dairy Products," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 35(3), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Joseph Vithayathil & Vidyanand Choudhary, 2022. "Organizational Structure for the IT Department: Profit Center or Cost Center?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 2053-2076, December.
    6. Sam Solaimani & Harry Bouwman & Timo Itälä, 2015. "Networked enterprise business model alignment: A case study on smart living," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 871-887, August.
    7. Davis, Christopher G. & Dong, Diansheng & Blayney, Donald P. & Yen, Steven T. & Stillman, Richard, 2012. "U.S. Fluid Milk Demand: A Disaggregated Approach," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Huang, Min-Hsin & Hahn, David E. & Jones, Eugene, 2004. "Determinants Of Price Elasticities For Store Brands And National Brands Of Cheese," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20235, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Capps, Jr., Oral J. & Gao, Long, 2023. "A Comparison of Demand System Models Peculiar to a Granular Array of Dairy Products," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 54(03), November.
    10. Maynard, Leigh J., 2000. "Empirical Tests Of The Argument That Consumers Value Stable Retail Milk Prices," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 18(2), pages 1-18.
    11. Harry Bouwman & Mark Reuver & Marikka Heikkilä & Erwin Fielt, 2020. "Business model tooling: where research and practice meet," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 413-419, September.
    12. Guo, Jie & Bouwman, Harry, 2016. "An analytical framework for an m-payment ecosystem: A merchants׳ perspective," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 147-167.
    13. Ralph Foorthuis & Marlies Steenbergen & Sjaak Brinkkemper & Wiel A. G. Bruls, 2016. "A theory building study of enterprise architecture practices and benefits," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 541-564, June.
    14. Huang, Min-Hsin & Hahn, David E. & Jones, Eugene, 2003. "A Socioeconomic Approach To Assessing Price Competition Between Private Labels And National Brands: The Case Of Shredded Cheese," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21993, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Davis, Christopher G. & Blayney, Donald P. & Dong, Diansheng & Yen, Steven T. & Johnson, Rachel J., 2011. "Will Changing Demographics Affect U.S. Cheese Demand?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(2), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Morteza Alaeddini & Hamed Asgari & Arash Gharibi & Mona Rashidi Rad, 2017. "Leveraging business-IT alignment through enterprise architecture—an empirical study to estimate the extents," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 55-82, March.
    17. Chulhwan Chris Bang, 2015. "Information systems frontiers: Keyword analysis and classification," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 217-237, February.
    18. Maynard, Leigh J., 2000. "Sources Of Irreversible Consumer Demand In U.S. Dairy Products," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21876, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Morteza Alaeddini & Sepideh Salekfard, 2013. "Investigating the role of an enterprise architecture project in the business-IT alignment in Iran," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 67-88, March.
    20. Stockton, Matthew C., 2005. "A Demand System Analysis With Emphasis On Container Size Of Fluid Milk," A.E. Research Series 305036, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:ededed:v:html10.3280/ed2013-001003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=202 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.