IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/ccadaa/vhtml10.3280-cca2016-001004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La rappresentazione del patrimonio e del reddito nel bilancio secondo l?approccio dualista tedesco: l?attualit? dei contributi di Schmidt e Sewering

Author

Listed:
  • Giacomo Manetti
  • Massimo Cecchi
  • Luca Bagnoli

Abstract

Nell?ambito delle teorie di bilancio tedesche della prima met? del ventesimo secolo, il presente contributo esamina il ruolo e le influenze sulla prassi contabile internazionale delle opere dei due principali dualisti tedeschi: Fritz Schmidt e Karl Sewering. L?obiettivo della ricerca, di natura esplorativa, ? ricostruire gli scopi conoscitivi, l?approccio teorico-pratico e le principali ripercussioni sulle discipline di Accounting a livello internazionale (in particolare sul concetto di conservazione del capitale) di tali autori. Le finalit? dello studio sono perseguite attraverso un approccio metodologico di tipo deduttivo, fondato su un?indagine storiografica di natura documentale. Dai risultati della ricerca emergono alcune indicazioni, che richiedono ulteriori approfondimenti per condurre a conclusioni certe, a sostegno della tesi per la quale le commissioni che hanno redatto la IV direttiva CEE e il Framework IASB si siano avvalse, seppur indirettamente, delle idee e delle proposte dei dualisti tedeschi in tema di conservazione del capitale. Nelle conclusioni, infine, si delineano i principali limiti del presente studio e i suoi possibili sviluppi.

Suggested Citation

  • Giacomo Manetti & Massimo Cecchi & Luca Bagnoli, 2016. "La rappresentazione del patrimonio e del reddito nel bilancio secondo l?approccio dualista tedesco: l?attualit? dei contributi di Schmidt e Sewering," CONTABILIT? E CULTURA AZIENDALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 41-62.
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:ccadaa:v:html10.3280/cca2016-001004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=57011&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard V. Mattessich, 1986. "Fritz Schmidt (1882–1950) and his pioneering work of current value accounting in comparison to Edwards and Bell's theory," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 157-178, March.
    2. Whittington, Geoffrey, 2008. "Harmonisation or discord? The critical role of the IASB conceptual framework review," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 495-502.
    3. Walther Busse von Colbe, 1996. "Accounting and the business economics tradition in Germany," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 413-434.
    4. Richard Mattessich, 2003. "Accounting research and researchers of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century: an international survey of authors, ideas and publications," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 125-170.
    5. Geoffrey Whittington, 2008. "Fair Value and the IASB/FASB Conceptual Framework Project: An Alternative View," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 44(2), pages 139-168, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mala, Rajni & Chand, Parmod, 2015. "Commentary on phase A of the revised conceptual framework: Implications for global financial reporting," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 209-218.
    2. Zhang, Ying & Andrew, Jane, 2014. "Financialisation and the Conceptual Framework," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 17-26.
    3. Erb, Carsten & Pelger, Christoph, 2015. "“Twisting words”? A study of the construction and reconstruction of reliability in financial reporting standard-setting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 13-40.
    4. Thereza RS de Aguiar, 2018. "Turning accounting for emissions rights inside out as well as upside down," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 139-159, February.
    5. Céline Michaïlesco, 2005. "Jean Dumarchey (1874-1946) : une contribution à la théorie du bilan et de la valeur," Post-Print halshs-00156408, HAL.
    6. Matis Dumitru & Bonaci Carmen Giorgiana, 2011. "Recent Developments Of The Financial Reporting Model: Theoretical Studies In Review," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 629-635, July.
    7. Hayoun, Shaul, 2019. "How fair value is both market-based and entity-specific: The irreducibility of value constellations to market prices," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 68-82.
    8. Zhang, Ying & Andrew, Jane, 2022. "Financialisation and the Conceptual Framework: An update," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Veiga, José & Fernandes, Joaquim & Gonçalves, Cristina & Andraz, Georgette, 2015. "The Relevance of Fair Value Across Countries: Firms Listed in Lisbon and Madrid Stock Exchange," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 3(1), pages 78-95.
    10. Sean Scannell & Vincent Tawiah, 2024. "A Thematic Literature Review on International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS)," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1053-1075, September.
    11. David B. Sutton & Carolyn J. Cordery & Tony Zijl, 2015. "The Purpose of Financial Reporting: The Case for Coherence in the Conceptual Framework and Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(1), pages 116-141, March.
    12. Biondi, Yuri, 2008. "De Charybde de la comptabilité de caisse en Scylla de la comptabilité patrimoniale," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 3.
    13. Newberry Susan, 2014. "The Use of Accrual Accounting in New Zealand’s Central Government: Second Thoughts," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 283-297, December.
    14. Oladeji E. OLADUTIRE & Kazeem A. SOYINKA & Mofehintolu T. AKINNOLA, 2023. "Accounting Theory Formulation: the Methodological Approach," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(11), pages 1645-1655, November.
    15. Liyu He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2021. "The impact of managerial discretion on fair value information in the Australian agricultural sector," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1897-1930, April.
    16. Li Yu (Colly) He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2018. "Is fair value information relevant to investment decision-making: Evidence from the Australian agricultural sector?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(4), pages 555-574, November.
    17. Guilherme Belloque & Martina K Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K Singh & Rui Xue, 2021. "55 years of Abacus: Evolution of Research Streams and Future Research Directions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 593-618, September.
    18. Georgiou, Omiros & Jack, Lisa, 2011. "In pursuit of legitimacy: A history behind fair value accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 311-323.
    19. Bonaci Carmen Giorgiana & Mustata Razvan V. & Matis Dumitru, 2012. "Accounting Standard Setting In The International Arena: Update On The Convergence Project," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 866-872, July.
    20. Marco Fasan & Carlo Marcon, 2014. "Accounting Tradition and other drivers of the Fair Value choice: An Opportunistic Management perspective," Working Papers 13, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:ccadaa:v:html10.3280/cca2016-001004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=178 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.