IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/htprjr/15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thought and Metaphor: Does Philosophy Teaching Clash or Collaborate with Literary Education?

Author

Listed:
  • Jūratė Baranova

    (Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences)

Abstract

M. Mahlios, D. Massengill-Show and A. Bary in the article “Making Sense of Teaching through Metaphors: a Review across the Studies” investigated how metaphors influence teachers approach to teaching, curriculum and their work with pupil (Mahlios, Massengill-Show, Barry 2010: 49-71). The aim of this thesis is rather different: to investigate the relation between the thought (concept) an the image described by words (metaphor). The question would be asked: is it possible such a phenomenon as the literary argument, which was formulated by Jacques Derrida in discussion with Habermas. If it is possible, next question; how it is possible? How can the consequences of this clash between metaphor and concept be reflected in the philosophy of education? Can literature as interdisciplinary subject on equal grounds be included into philosophy curriculum? Can philosophy on equal grounds be included into literature curriculum? If not - what is the reason for their separation? If on the contrary on chooses the opposite premise that they can be included - what are the philosophical suppositions for their meeting? This article tries to overview the problem from the historical perspective and to suggest the theoretical approach relying on Jacques Derrida conception.

Suggested Citation

  • Jūratė Baranova, 2022. "Thought and Metaphor: Does Philosophy Teaching Clash or Collaborate with Literary Education?," Humanities Today: Proceedings Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:htprjr:15
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v11i2.p350-358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/htpr/article/view/1439
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/htpr_v1_i2_22/Baranova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v11i2.p350-358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:htprjr:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/htpr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.