IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejserj/297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating Boundaries Between Gender and Social Identities in the Principality of Samos: The Case of Divorces (1902-1911)

Author

Listed:
  • Vasilios Gialamas

    (Faculty of Early Childhood Education)

  • Sofia Iliadou Tachou
  • Alexia Orfanou

Abstract

This study focuses on divorces in the Principality of Samos, which existed from 1834 to 1912. The process of divorce is described according to the laws of the rincipality, and divorces are examined among those published in the Newspaper of the Government of the Principality of Samos from the last decade of the Principality from 1902 to 1911. Issues linked to divorce are investigated, like the differences between husbands and wives regarding the initiation and reasons for requesting a divorce. These differences are integrated in the specific social context of the Principality, and the qualitative characteristics are determined in regard to the gender ratio of women and men that is articulated by the invocation of divorce. The aim is to determine the boundaries of social identities of gender with focus on the prevailing perceptions of the social roles of men and women. Gender is used as a social and cultural construction. It is argued that the social gender identity is formed through a process of “performativity†, that is, through adaptation to the dominant social ideals.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasilios Gialamas & Sofia Iliadou Tachou & Alexia Orfanou, 2016. "Negotiating Boundaries Between Gender and Social Identities in the Principality of Samos: The Case of Divorces (1902-1911)," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:297
    DOI: 10.26417/ejser.v8i1.p90-103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser/article/view/6453
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejser_v3_i4_16/Vasilios.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejser.v8i1.p90-103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sproten, Alec & Diener, Carsten & Fiebach, Christian & Schwieren, Christiane, 2010. "Aging and decision making: How aging affects decisions under uncertainty," Working Papers 0508, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    2. Judith Glück & Susan Bluck, 2011. "Laypeople's Conceptions of Wisdom and Its Development: Cognitive and Integrative Views," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(3), pages 321-324.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajit Nayak, 2016. "Wisdom and the Tragic Question: Moral Learning and Emotional Perception in Leadership and Organisations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Chao S Hu & Michel Ferrari & Ru-De Liu & Qin Gao & Ethan Weare, 2018. "Mainland Chinese Implicit Theory of Wisdom: Generational and Cultural Differences," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(8), pages 1416-1424.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejserj:297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.