IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejesjr/144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Management for Organizational Performance: from Which Come the Mistakes of Strategic Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Ahdil Imane

    (ISGA, Research Center ISGA, Casablanca, Morocco.)

  • Driss Harrizi

Abstract

The current context of organizations is marked by changes or even dramatic changes. The main function of decision-makers becomes increasingly difficult and complex. At the same time, performance has become one of the most important topics within companies. That is why management and economics have addressed this central issue. Faced with a turbulent environment characterized by rough and fierce competition, guaranteeing performance and above all maintaining it becomes a strategic priority, which is why strategic management will be called upon. So our article will deal first with the performance of companies and the role of strategic management in this sought-after performance; and the precautions to be taken into account in strategic decision-making. To do this, we will begin our research by the conceptual framework of performance, to justify the contribution of strategic management in the performance of the company. The paper will conclude with an analysis of strategic decision-making and recommendations. The methodology used in this paper is a literature review.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahdil Imane & Driss Harrizi, 2017. "Strategic Management for Organizational Performance: from Which Come the Mistakes of Strategic Decision-Making," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejesjr:144
    DOI: 10.26417/ejes.v9i1.p291-300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejes/article/view/2974
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejes_v3_i3_17/Ahdil.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejes.v9i1.p291-300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Yan & Zhou, Jian & Zhou, Nan, 2007. "Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 300-327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zvi Singer & Jing Zhang, 2022. "Do companies try to conceal financial misstatements through auditor shopping?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1-2), pages 140-180, January.
    2. Ines Maraghni & Mehdi Nekhili & Tawhid Chtioui, 2016. "Caractéristiques du comité d'audit et étendue du reporting sur le contrôle interne : cas des entreprises françaises," Post-Print hal-01901185, HAL.
    3. George Drogalas & Michail Nerantzidis & Dimitrios Mitskinis & Ioannis Tampakoudis, 2021. "The relationship between audit fees and audit committee characteristics: evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 24-41, March.
    4. Ashraf Mohammad Salem Alrjoub & Muhannad Akram Ahmad, 2017. "Internal Audit and its Impact on Risk Management at the Islamic Banks Listed in Amman Stock Exchange," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(8), pages 414-430, August.
    5. Chan, Lilian H. & Chen, Kevin C.W. & Chen, Tai-Yuan & Yu, Yangxin, 2012. "The effects of firm-initiated clawback provisions on earnings quality and auditor behavior," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 180-196.
    6. Seon Mi Kim & Yura Kim, 2017. "Product market competition on the effectiveness of internal control," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1-2), pages 163-182, April.
    7. Thi-Thanh Phan & Hai-Chin Yu, 2022. "Innovation, institutional ownerships and board diversity," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1647-1693, November.
    8. Chang, Hsihui & Choy, Hiu Lam & Cooper, William W. & Ruefli, Timothy W., 2009. "Using Malmquist Indexes to measure changes in the productivity and efficiency of US accounting firms before and after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 951-960, October.
    9. Kwangwuk Oh & Wooseok Choi & Seok Woo Jeong & Jinhan Pae, 2014. "The effect of different levels of internal control over financial reporting regulation on the quality of accounting information: evidence from Korea," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 412-442, December.
    10. Yin, Meiqun & Zhang, Jidong & Han, Jing, 2020. "Impact of CEO-board social ties on accounting conservatism: Internal control quality as a mediator," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    11. Hermes, Cornelis & Oxelheim, L. & Randoy, Trond & Hooghiemstra, Reginald, 2015. "The impact of board internationalization on earnings management," Research Report 15010-I&O, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    12. Habiba Al‐Shaer & Mahbub Zaman, 2018. "Credibility of sustainability reports: The contribution of audit committees," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 973-986, November.
    13. Jillian Alderman & S. Jane Jollineau, 2020. "Can Audit Committee Expertise Increase External Auditors' Litigation Risk? The Moderating Effect of Audit Committee Independence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 717-740, June.
    14. Chahine, Salim & Filatotchev, Igor, 2011. "The effects of corporate governance and audit and non-audit fees on IPO Value," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 155-172.
    15. Yuanto Kusnadi & Kwong Sin Leong & Themin Suwardy & Jiwei Wang, 2016. "Audit Committees and Financial Reporting Quality in Singapore," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 197-214, November.
    16. Claudine Mangen & Alexia Paduano & Bianca Paduano & Jessica Hadzurik & Juliano Leggio & Kayla Russo, 2020. "Smoke and Mirrors? Disclosures in the Marijuana Industry in Canada," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 149-179, September.
    17. Bilal, & Chen, Songsheng & Komal, Bushra, 2018. "Audit committee financial expertise and earnings quality: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 253-270.
    18. C. S. Agnes Cheng & Yuan Huang & Sun & Yumiao Yu, 2021. "Geographic location of audit committee chairs and accruals quality: evidence from China," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1215-1246, November.
    19. Mahfuja Malik, 2014. "Audit committee composition and effectiveness: a review of post-SOX literature," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 81-117, October.
    20. Zalata, Alaa Mansour & Tauringana, Venancio & Tingbani, Ishmael, 2018. "Audit committee financial expertise, gender, and earnings management: Does gender of the financial expert matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 170-183.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejesjr:144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejes .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.