IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/etc/journl/y2015i12p47-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pragmatism and Political Pluralism - Consensus and Pluralism

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Marsonet

Abstract

A pragmatist thinker like Nicholas Rescher deems the idea that social harmony must be predicated in consensus to be both dangerous and misleading. An essential problem of our time is the creation of political and social institutions that enable people to live together in peaceful and productive ways, despite the presence of not eliminable disagreements about theoretical and practical issues. Such remarks, in turn, strictly recall the �practical� impossibility of settling philosophical disputes by having recourse to abstract and aprioristic principles. In the circumstances, the social model of team members cooperating for a common purpose is unrealistic. A more adequate model is, instead, that of a classical capitalism where - in a sufficiently well developed system - both competition and rivalry manage somehow to foster the benefit of the entire community (theory of the �hidden hand�). Certainly the scientific community is one of the best examples of this that we have, although even in this case we must be careful not to give too idealized a picture of scientific research. Consensus, however, in the Western tradition is an ideal worth being pursued. At this point we are faced with two basic positions. On the one side (a) �consensualists� maintain that disagreement should be averted no matter what, while, on the other, (b) �pluralists� accept disagreement because they take dissensus to be an inevitable feature of the imperfect world in which we live. A pluralistic vision, therefore, tries to make dissensus tolerable, and not to eliminate it. All theories of idealized consensus present us with serious setbacks. This is the case, for instance, with Charles S. Peirce. As is well known, Peirce takes truth to be �the limit of inquiry,� i.e. either what science will discover in the (idealized) long run, or what it would discover if the human efforts were so extended. By taking this path, thus, truth is nothing but the ultimate consensus reached within the scientific community. We can be sure that, once a �final� answer to a question has been found which is thereafter maintained without change, that one is the truth we were looking for. This fascinating theory, however, has various unfortunate consequences. In our day the German philosopher J�rgen Habermas has in a way revived these Peircean insights, putting forward an influential theory to the effect that consensus indeed plays a key role in human praxis, so that the primary task of philosophy is to foster it by eliminating the disagreement which we constantly have to face in the course of our daily life. In his �communicative theory of consensus,� furthermore, he claims that human communication rests on an implicit commitment to a sort of �ideal speech situation� which is the normative foundation of agreement in linguistic matters. Consequently, the quest for consensus is a constitutive feature of our nature of (rational) human beings: rationality and consensus are tied together. A very strong consequence derives from Habermas� premises: were we to abandon the search for consensus we would lose rationality, too, and this makes us understand that he views the pursuit of consensus as a regulative principle (rather than as a merely practical objective). Rescher opposes both Peirce�s eschatological view and Habermas� regulative and idealized one.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Marsonet, 2015. "Pragmatism and Political Pluralism - Consensus and Pluralism," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 12, pages 47-58, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2015:i:12:p:47-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr12/Academicus-MMXV-12-047-058.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://academicus.edu.al/nr12/Academicus-MMXV-12-047-058.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michele Marsonet, 2013. "Pragmatism and Science," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 8, pages 101-109, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michele Marsonet, 2016. "Science and Different Images of the World," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 14, pages 14-27, July.
    2. Sali Shehu, 2017. "Political Consensus: A crucial and key element of political organization," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 15, pages 80-90, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michele Marsonet, 2017. "Pragmatism and Evolutionary Epistemology," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 16, pages 105-112, July.
    2. Latasha Holt, 2020. "John Dewey: A Look at His Contributions to Curriculum," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 21, pages 142-150, January.
    3. Michele Marsonet, 2018. "Logic and its Pragmatic Aspects," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 17, pages 46-53, March.
    4. Michele Marsonet, 2016. "Science and Different Images of the World," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 14, pages 14-27, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:etc:journl:y:2015:i:12:p:47-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gabor Vasmatics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etctial.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.