IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024ispecialap510-530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Business Environment Perception on Pro-Ecological Activities in Polish Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Jowita Trzcielinska
  • Renata Kaps

Abstract

Purpose: Studies in sociology and scientific management indicate that the actions of people and organizations depend on how they perceive the changes taking place in their environment. The changes taking place create both threats and opportunities. Threats trigger defensive behaviour and opportunities trigger actions that lead to their exploitation. People and organizations, including enterprises, face the need to take pro-environmental actions. The purpose of this article is to deepen the understanding of the impact of perceptions of changes in the macroenvironment and industry environment on the pro-ecological decisions of medium and large sized enterprises. Design/Methodology/Approach: There is an extensive literature on the benefits and barriers associated with pro-environmental transformation of enterprises. However, there are few publications on perceptions of changes in the environment and their relationship to "greening" activities of enterprises. Thus, there is a research and cognitive gap that we are trying to fill by verifying the hypothesis that a positive attitude to the changes taking place in the environment allows one to see opportunities in pro-environmental transformation processes. We verify this hypothesis through an empirical study, which was conducted in 150 medium and large enterprises operating in Poland. The data obtained were processed using the following tests: Spearman's rank correlation, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and multiple rank comparisons as well as descriptive statistics. Findings: Although we found that a positive attitude toward changes in the business environment encourages companies to make pro-ecological transformations, it is not perceived as a market opportunity. It is not reflected in positive business development trends. This transformation is rather forced by regulations regarding the Green Deal. Practical Implications: Our research results indicate the importance of recognizing changes in the business environment. This is essential for discovering and creating market opportunities. In order to notice opportunities related to pro-ecological transformation among these changes, managers must more deeply recognize trends in buyers' expectations regarding sustainable products. Originality/Value: Analysing for the first time how medium and large enterprises operating in Poland perceive changes in their environment and whether these observations impact implementing by them pro-ecological activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jowita Trzcielinska & Renata Kaps, 2024. "Impact of Business Environment Perception on Pro-Ecological Activities in Polish Firms," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special A), pages 510-530.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:speciala:p:510-530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3734/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Sara Russo-Garrido & Nicolas Merveille, 2020. "Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Felix Carl Schultz & Robert Jaroslav Reinhardt, 2023. "Technological Challenges and Opportunities to Plastics Valorization in the Context of a Circular Economy in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Bora Ly, 2021. "Competitive advantage and internationalization of a circular economy model in apparel multinationals," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1944012-194, January.
    4. Quariguasi Frota Neto, J. & Walther, G. & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & Spengler, T., 2007. "From Closed-Loop to Sustainable Supply Chains: The WEEE case," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-036-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Thomas Wastling & Fiona Charnley & Mariale Moreno, 2018. "Design for Circular Behaviour: Considering Users in a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Tom Lahti & Joakim Wincent & Vinit Parida, 2018. "A Definition and Theoretical Review of the Circular Economy, Value Creation, and Sustainable Business Models: Where Are We Now and Where Should Research Move in the Future?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    8. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    9. Giovanna Bimonte & Maria Grazia Romano & Maria Russolillo, 2021. "Green Innovation and Competition: R&D Incentives in a Circular Economy," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Mostaghel, Rana & Chirumalla, Koteshwar, 2021. "Role of customers in circular business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 35-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ante Glavas & Jenny Mish, 2015. "Resources and Capabilities of Triple Bottom Line Firms: Going Over Old or Breaking New Ground?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 623-642, March.
    2. Adamides, Emmanuel D. & Voutsina, Marinie, 2006. "The double-helix model of manufacturing and marketing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 3-18, November.
    3. Elena Vidal & Will Mitchell, 2015. "Adding by Subtracting: The Relationship Between Performance Feedback and Resource Reconfiguration Through Divestitures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1101-1118, August.
    4. Luís Cabral, 2016. "Living Up to Expectations: Corporate Reputation and Persistence of Firm Performance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 2-11, March.
    5. Lin, Hsing-Er & Hsu, I-Chieh & Hsu, Audrey Wenhsin & Chung, Hsi-Mei, 2020. "Creating competitive advantages: Interactions between ambidextrous diversification strategy and contextual factors from a dynamic capability perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Tiberio Daddi & Niccolò Maria Todaro & Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Marco Frey, 2018. "A Systematic Review of the Use of Organization and Management Theories in Climate Change Studies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 456-474, May.
    7. Basu, Sandip & Phelps, Corey & Kotha, Suresh, 2011. "Towards understanding who makes corporate venture capital investments and why," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 153-171, March.
    8. Roberta Angelis, 2022. "Circular Economy Business Models: a Repertoire of Theoretical Relationships and a Research Agenda," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 433-446, June.
    9. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Mario Le Glatin & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Designing Decisions In The Unknown: Towards A Generative Decision Model For Management Science," Post-Print hal-01937103, HAL.
    10. Antonelli, Cristiano & David, Paul, 2015. "The Useful Application of Knowledge: An Introduction," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201538, University of Turin.
    11. Douglas Dow & Peter Liesch & Lawrence Welch, 2018. "Inertia and Managerial Intentionality: Extending the Uppsala Model," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 465-493, June.
    12. Henrich R. Greve, 2002. "Sticky Aspirations: Organizational Time Perspective and Competitiveness," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Clark G. Gilbert, 2006. "Change in the Presence of Residual Fit: Can Competing Frames Coexist?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 150-167, February.
    14. Nizar Abdelkafi & Jinou Xu & Margherita Pero & Federica Ciccullo & Antonio Masi, 2023. "Does the combination of sustainable business model patterns lead to truly sustainable business models? Critical analysis of existing frameworks and extensions," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 597-634, May.
    15. Lukas Alexander Benz, 2022. "Critical Success Factors for Circular Business Model Innovation from the Perspective of the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Frederik Banning & Jessica Reale & Michael Roos, 2023. "The Complexity of Corporate Culture as a Potential Source of Firm Profit Differentials," Papers 2305.14029, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    17. Felicitas Pietrulla, 2022. "Private Firm Support for Circular Economy Regulation in the EU Policy Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    18. Linda Argote & Henrich R. Greve, 2007. "A Behavioral Theory of the Firm ---40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 337-349, June.
    19. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Benoit Weil, 2016. "Innovation theory and the logic of generativity: from optimization to design, a new post-decisional paradigm in management science," Post-Print hal-01481881, HAL.
    20. Madanaguli, Arun & Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Mikalef, Patrick, 2024. "Artificial intelligence capabilities for circular business models: Research synthesis and future agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Circular economy; environmental sustainability; pro-ecological business strategies; opportunity recognition in environmental change.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:speciala:p:510-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.