IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i3p1297-1326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Green Economy in Poland in Voivodeship Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Kama Daniek
  • Anna Kozielec

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of the study was to measure and evaluate the progress of the green economy implementation in Poland’s voivodeships between 2005 and 2018. The primary focus of the conducted statistical analyses was the construction of original Regional Green Economy Measure (RGEM) and four synthetic measures related to the green economy areas: Natural asset base, Environmental and resource productivity of the economy, Environmental quality of life, and Economic opportunities and policy responses. Five measures allowed for multidimensional comparisons across voivodeships. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study employed linear ranking methods based on synthetic variables, enabling the development of voivodeship rankings. Among the qualitative methods was an expert survey utilized during the process of substantive indicator selection, as well as a bibliometric analysis of the green economy concept. Findings: Based on the conducted research, it was found that voivodships differ in the degree of the green economy implementation. The leader turned out to be the Śląskie Voivodship, while the weakest results in terms of the green economy principles implementation were usually achieved by the Świętokrzyskie Voivodship. The Śląskie Voivodship has achieved a leadership position in the implementation of the green economy through its focus on sustainable utilization of natural resources, improvements in energy efficiency, and the transformation of sectors towards greater ecological sustainability. The significant diversity in the development of the green economy across individual voivodeships highlights the need to establish more effective policy and strategic frameworks tailored to the unique conditions of each region. Practical Implications: The study emphasizes the importance of region-specific strategies to address disparities in green economy development. Policymakers should focus on improving green economy indicators through targeted investments in sustainability, renewable energy, and efficient resource management. Strengthening data collection and monitoring systems can support informed decision-making and accelerate the transition to a sustainable economy, benefiting both the environment and regional development. Originality/Value: The study introduces the original Regional Green Economy Measure (RGEM), a comprehensive tool for assessing green economy implementation across Poland's voivodeships. By combining quantitative methods with region-specific data, it provides a novel approach to measuring sustainability progress. The research's focus on regional disparities and the use of multidimensional synthetic measures fills a gap in existing studies, offering valuable insights for tailoring policies to local conditions. This innovative framework can serve as a model for similar assessments in other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Kama Daniek & Anna Kozielec, 2024. "Measuring the Green Economy in Poland in Voivodeship Perspective," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 1297-1326.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:1297-1326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3838/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grzegorz Drozdowski & Paweł Dziekański, 2022. "Local Disproportions of Quality of Life and Their Influence on the Process of Green Economy Development in Polish Voivodships in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Andreea Loredana Bîrgovan & Elena Simina Lakatos & Andrea Szilagyi & Lucian Ionel Cioca & Roxana Lavinia Pacurariu & George Ciobanu & Elena Cristina Rada, 2022. "How Should We Measure? A Review of Circular Cities Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ginevra Balletto & Mara Ladu & Federico Camerin & Emilio Ghiani & Jacopo Torriti, 2022. "More Circular City in the Energy and Ecological Transition: A Methodological Approach to Sustainable Urban Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Ernesto D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez & Vinay Kandpal & Marcio Machado & Mauro Luiz Martens & Sushobhan Majumdar, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Circular Economies through Sustainable Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Lu Yu & Sichen Chen & Zhe Tan, 2024. "Analysis of Solid Waste Treatment and Management in Typical Chinese Industrial Parks with the Goal of Sustainable Development and Future Suggestions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Martina Zámková & Stanislav Rojík & Martin Prokop & Simona Činčalová & Radek Stolín, 2023. "Consumers’ Behavior in the Field of Organic Agriculture and Food Products during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Czech Republic: Focus on a Comparison of Hyper-, Super- and Farmers’ Markets and Direct Pu," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Piotr Misztal & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Green Economy and Waste Management as Determinants of Modeling Green Capital of Districts in Poland in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Mihaela Hrisanta Mosora & Mirela Ionela Aceleanu & Lucian Alexa & Anca Maria Gherman & Cosmin Liviu Mosora, 2023. "Collection of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment at the European Level," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(62), pages 101-101, February.
    7. Djamilia Skripnuk & Nikolay Didenko & Albina Gazizulina & Kseniia N. Kikkas & Konstantin Skripniuk, 2023. "Methodology of a Circular Economy in a Specific Territory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Zhiyuan Yang & Dong Yang & Jingjie Geng & Fengxia Tian, 2022. "Evaluation of Suitability and Spatial Distribution of Rural Settlements in the Karst Mountainous Area of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Renata Matysik-Pejas & Małgorzata Bogusz & Kamila Daniek & Monika Szafrańska & Łukasz Satoła & Andrzej Krasnodębski & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "An Assessment of the Spatial Diversification of Agriculture in the Conditions of the Circular Economy in European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Karolina Jozefowicz, 2024. "Differences in Economic Competitiveness between Small Towns in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 142-174.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Green economy; sustainable development; regional development; green;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:1297-1326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.