IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i1p67-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Security in the Philosophical Thought of Thomas Hobbes

Author

Listed:
  • Tadeusz Szczurek
  • Marcin Gornikiewicz

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the research, whose findings are presented in this article, was to determine the contribution of Thomas Hobbes to the materialist-empirical concept of security. Design/Methodology/Approach: The main research problem was formulated as the question: What is the place of the materialist-empirical concept of security in the philosophical thought of Thomas Hobbes? The research process utilized both theoretical and empirical methods characteristic of social sciences, including source analysis, case studies, and expert interviews (Wiśniewski). European literature on the subject was reviewed alongside empirical material derived from eleven interviews with Polish experts representing security studies, philosophy, sociology, and political science. The research focused on Hobbes's views on the state as both the guarantor and subject of security. Findings: The materialist-empirical concept of security in Hobbes's work is illustrated in his most significant work, “Leviathan, or the Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil”. Leviathan emerged from a pessimistic view of human nature and humanity's longing for political stability. The realization of this longing was the security provided by the state, which wielded both military and spiritual-religious power. Security and stability arose from limiting human absolute freedom, including mitigating or even eliminating evils such as distrust, hostility, and unrestrained aggression. This security, stability, and peace were to be guaranteed by a state established through a social contract that could not be broken. For Hobbes, without the state, there is no internal security, order, or structure that enables society to live and develop. At the same time, Hobbes acknowledged that the state is not always capable of ensuring external security. This necessitates international agreements and supranational institutions that effectively guarantee global security. Practical Implications: The practical implications primarily relate to the need for a more in-depth and critical examination of the works of Thomas Hobbes. Specifically, Hobbes's views should be subjected to comprehensive scientific reflection from the perspective of security studies. Originality/Value: The research findings highlight the significant contribution of Thomas Hobbes to the modern framework of the materialist-empirical concept of security.

Suggested Citation

  • Tadeusz Szczurek & Marcin Gornikiewicz, 2025. "Security in the Philosophical Thought of Thomas Hobbes," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 67-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:1:p:67-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3891/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Security; war; security concepts; Hobbes; Leviathan.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion
    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:1:p:67-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.