IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial5p366-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grey Method of Selecting a Contractor in the UN Public Procurement

Author

Listed:
  • Arkadiusz Borowiec
  • Marcin Nowak

Abstract

Purpose: The article proposes a new method for selecting a contractor in United Nations public procurement. Approach: This method is based on the use of the grey number decision model. Findings: The presented model, which belongs to the grey systems theory, enables to combine quantitative and qualitative criteria in the assessment of the contractors. Practical Implications: The method is particularly applicable in case of the presence of subjective features among the evaluation criteria which are difficult to express on a quantitative scale. An example of its use may be the so-called green public procurement, in which, apart from the quantitative criteria, such as price, there are qualitative criteria related, for example, to the impact of the offer on the social and ecological environment. The first section of the article presents the basics issues related to public procurement. In the second section, the essence of the grey systems theory is described. The third part of the article presents the structure and procedure in the grey method of selecting a contractor in public procurement on the example of the United Nations. Value: Finally, the developed method as presented on the selected case study can be a guide for future cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Arkadiusz Borowiec & Marcin Nowak, 2021. "Grey Method of Selecting a Contractor in the UN Public Procurement," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 366-378.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special5:p:366-378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2738/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Congjun Rao & Mark Goh & Junjun Zheng, 2017. "Erratum: "Decision Mechanism for Supplier Selection Under Sustainability"," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 591-591, March.
    2. Congjun Rao & Mark Goh & Junjun Zheng, 2017. "Decision Mechanism for Supplier Selection Under Sustainability," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 87-115, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuangao Chen & Shuo Wang & Jianrong Yao & Yixiao Li & Shuiqing Yang, 2018. "Socially responsible supplier selection and sustainable supply chain development: A combined approach of total interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy analytic network process," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1708-1719, December.
    2. Zhaojun Yang & Xiaoting Guo & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang, 2021. "Contextual and organizational factors in sustainable supply chain decision making: grey relational analysis and interpretative structural modeling," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12056-12076, August.
    3. Mustafa Batuhan Ayhan, 2018. "A New Decision Making Approach for Supplier Selection: Hesitant Fuzzy Axiomatic Design," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1085-1117, July.
    4. Congjun Rao & Yawen He & Xinping Xiao, 2023. "Selection decision-making mechanism of “zero-waste city” in the yangtze river economic zone," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11421-11454, October.
    5. Tarkan Tan & M. Hakan Akyüz & Bengisu Urlu & Santiago Ruiz, 2024. "Stop Auditing and Start to CARE: Paradigm Shift in Assessing and Improving Supplier Sustainability," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 241-263, May.
    6. Mishra, Arunodaya Raj & Mardani, Abbas & Rani, Pratibha & Kamyab, Hesam & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "A new intuitionistic fuzzy combinative distance-based assessment framework to assess low-carbon sustainable suppliers in the maritime sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    7. Shaojian Qu & Yongyi Zhou, 2017. "A Study of The Effect of Demand Uncertainty for Low-Carbon Products Using a Newsvendor Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Ehsan Javanmardi & Sifeng Liu & Naiming Xie, 2020. "Exploring Grey Systems Theory-Based Methods and Applications in Sustainability Studies: A Systematic Review Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, May.
    9. Huai-Wei Lo & Chao-Che Hsu & Chun-Nen Huang & James J. H. Liou, 2021. "An ITARA-TOPSIS Based Integrated Assessment Model to Identify Potential Product and System Risks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Marco Bertoni, 2019. "Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Sustainability and Value Assessment in Early PSS Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Chongfeng Lan & Zhongzhen Miao & Huanyong Ji, 2021. "Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain with an Unreliable and Competitive Supplier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public procurement; grey system theory; grey number decision model; grey decision-making.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics
    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special5:p:366-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.