IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i4bp433-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowdsourcing Platforms in a Participatory Model of Maritime and Sailing Culture Management - The Case Study of Szczecin Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Roma Strulak-Wojcikiewicz

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of the article is to present the premises indicating the need to use the potential of crowdsourcing in a participatory model of culture management to activate and integrate communities to shape culture in their cities. Design/Methodology/Approach: The article uses the method of review and critical analysis of the literature (sources), the survey method, the case study method - the city of Szczecin and the Business Model Canvas (BMC) method). Findings: The research results presented in the article indicate that a significant problem in creating culture in Szczecin and in the region is the lack of a common platform for cooperation in this area. This justifies the need to apply a participatory model of culture management to activate and integrate communities to shape culture in their cities. The potential of crowdsourcing confirms the legitimacy of creating an online cooperation platform for maritime and sailing culture in the city of Szczecin. Practical Implications: The online cooperation platform enables the integration of various groups of stakeholders involved in the creation and maintenance of maritime and sailing culture and facilitated the taking and implementation of activities in the field of creating and cultivating maritime and sailing traditions in the city of Szczecin. This platform can also be a place of cooperation between the cultural and business sector in promotion and dissemination of maritime and sailing culture in the region. Originality/Value: An in-depth analysis of the literature on the subject and the research results presented in the article indicate the need for further research on the concept of an online cooperation platform for maritime and sailing culture in the city of Szczecin. The article presents a proposal for a business model of such a platform built with the use of the BMC.

Suggested Citation

  • Roma Strulak-Wojcikiewicz, 2021. "Crowdsourcing Platforms in a Participatory Model of Maritime and Sailing Culture Management - The Case Study of Szczecin Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 433-443.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4b:p:433-443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2667/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen P. Osborne, 2006. "The New Public Governance?-super-1," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 377-387, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Maksimovska & Aleksandar Stojkov, 2019. "Composite Indicator of Social Responsiveness of Local Governments: An Empirical Mapping of the Networked Community Governance Paradigm," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 669-706, July.
    2. Olga I. Timofeeva, 2022. "Methodology and Results of Measuring the Transparency of Russian Regional Budgets," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 6, pages 44-58, December.
    3. Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2015. "Vers des écosystèmes de services gérontologiques ?," Post-Print hal-01164391, HAL.
    4. Laura Carmouze & Christophe Alaux & Fouchet Robert, 2021. "Co-construire les services publics locaux : une approche stratégique de la participation des parties prenantes externes. Cas de l’analyse des besoins sociaux dans des centres communaux d’action social," Post-Print hal-04188705, HAL.
    5. Nicola Mario Iacovino & Sara Barsanti & Lino Cinquini, 2017. "Public Organizations Between Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: the Case of the Tuscany Region," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 61-82, March.
    6. Finocchiaro Castro, Massimo & Guccio, Calogero & Rizzo, Ilde, 2023. "How "one-size-fits-all" public works contract does it better? An assessment of infrastructure provision in Italy," EconStor Preprints 270729, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. ter Bogt, Henk & Tillema, Sandra, 2016. "Accounting for trust and control: Public sector partnerships in the arts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 5-23.
    8. Mihajla Gavin & Scott Fitzgerald & Susan McGrath-Champ, 2022. "From marketising to empowering: Evaluating union responses to devolutionary policies in education," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(1), pages 80-99, March.
    9. Yuriy V. Belousov, 2022. "Transparent Budget in the System of Public Administration," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 79-91, August.
    10. Markiewicz Joanna, 2018. "Value Creation by Support Organizations Through the Prism of Conflicting Institutional Logics," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 54(2), pages 122-135, June.
    11. Niccol? Persiani & Alberto Romolini & Claudia Galanti, 2015. "Il nuovo sistema di controlli di regolarit? amministrativa e contabile nel Servizio Sanitario Italiano: i Percorsi Attuativi della Certificabilit?," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(94), pages 31-50.
    12. Shimaa Elkomy & Graham Cookson, 2020. "Performance Management Strategy: Waiting Time in the English National Health Services," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 95-112, March.
    13. Svetlana Suslova, 2014. "The Quasi-Markets Of Social Services: The Competitiveness Of Russian Nonprofit Organizations Against For-Profit Organizations And Public Providers," HSE Working papers WP BRP 16/PA/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    14. Laura Carmouze & Alan Sandry, 2020. "Complex Thinking and Computing Organization Facing Contingent Problems," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 401-419, June.
    15. Paolo Esposito & Spiridione Lucio Dicorato, 2020. "Sustainable Development, Governance and Performance Measurement in Public Private Partnerships (PPPs): A Methodological Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-25, July.
    16. Jos L. T. Blank & Bert Enserink & Alex A. S. van Heezik, 2019. "Policy Reforms and Productivity Change in the Dutch Drinking Water Industry: A Time Series Analysis 1980–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, June.
    17. O’Riordan Joanna & Boyle Richard, 2023. "Governance of reform in the Irish public service," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 71(3), pages 11-33, August.
    18. Pavel BACHMANN, 2012. "Openness to information disclosure: the case of Czech rural municipalities," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(12), pages 580-590.
    19. Smith, Göran & Hensher, David A., 2020. "Towards a framework for Mobility-as-a-Service policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 54-65.
    20. Steven Tobin & Atiq Zaman, 2022. "Regional Cooperation in Waste Management: Examining Australia’s Experience with Inter-municipal Cooperative Partnerships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-46, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crowdsourcing; participatory management model; online cooperation platform; maritime and sailing culture.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4b:p:433-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.