IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i4-part2p108-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Religiosity and Gender on Reflective and Intuitive Thinking – The Case of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Staniszewska
  • Monika Czerwonka
  • Krzysztof Kompa

Abstract

Purpose: Cognitive styles are preferred modes of intellectual functioning that meet individual human needs. Among the most important, cognitive psychology includes impulsivity and reflexivity, which are revealed during cognitive problem solving. In this study, we examine the relationship between the tendency to think impulsively or reflectively and gender and declared religiosity. Methodology: In this study, we will use the Cognitive Reflective Test (CRT), a simple and widely used tool examining inclination for impulsive or reflective thinking. A total of 511 Polish participants (students on master’s studies in economic major) completed two types of CRT tests (3- and 7-question versions). Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, tau-Kendall correlation, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney test. Findings: Results indicated that highly religious Polish survey respondents scored lower on the CRT compared to non-religious and that men scored higher on the CRT than women. Additionally, the CRT7 being less publicly known produced more impulsive (fewer correct answers) scores than the CRT3 version among both men and women. Practical Implications: The results provide information that female and highly religious Poles surveyed in our study display an impulsive cognitive style, while male and low religious think more reflectively. Originality/value: The results contribute to the diversity of research on the relationship between cognitive style and religiosity or gender by using tests of Polish survey respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Staniszewska & Monika Czerwonka & Krzysztof Kompa, 2021. "The Impact of Religiosity and Gender on Reflective and Intuitive Thinking – The Case of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4 - Part ), pages 108-119.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4-part2:p:108-119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2635/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reflective and intuitive thinking; cognitive reflection test (CRT); religiosity; gender.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4-part2:p:108-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.