IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxiiiy2010i3p145-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intellectual Capital and Business Performance: An Empirical Study for the Greek Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitrios Maditinos
  • Zeljko Sevic
  • Charalampos Tsairidis

Abstract

The aim of this study is to empirically examine the four elements of intellectual capital (human capital, customer capital, structural capital and innovation capital) and their relationship with business performance in the Athens Stock Exchange (ASE). This study was conducted based on a psychometrically validated questionnaire developed and launched by Bontis (1997) and Bontis et al. (2000). Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Model have been used as statistical methods to analyse the five hypotheses developed. Our results are designed to extend it to degrees consistent with those revealed by Bontis et al. (2000) for a Malaysian set of industries. In particularly, we found that: (a) human capital is important and positively associated to customer capital in both service and non-service industries; (b) customer capital has an influence in structural capital rather than in non-service industries; (c) innovation capital seems to have an important and positive relationship to structural capital, regardless of the industry type; and (d) structural capital has a positive relationship to business performance in both industry types, and especially in non-service industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitrios Maditinos & Zeljko Sevic & Charalampos Tsairidis, 2010. "Intellectual Capital and Business Performance: An Empirical Study for the Greek Listed Companies," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 145-168.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xiii:y:2010:i:3:p:145-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ersj.eu/repec/ers/papers/10_3_p7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 2004. "Index for 2004," European Union Politics, , vol. 5(4), pages 511-512, December.
    2. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bambang Hadi Prabowo, 2017. "The Impact of Intellectual Capital Disclosure and Information Asymmetry on the Cost of Equity Capital: an Empirical Investigation in Indonesia," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 6(5), pages 01-12, September.
    2. Cheng-Hung Tsai & Eugene Burgos Mutuc, 2020. "Evidence in Asian Food Industry: Intellectual Capital, Corporate Financial Performance, and Corporate Social Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Hsiao, Shu-Hua, 2014. "PTE, innovation capital and firm value interactions in the biotech medical industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2636-2644.
    4. Francesca Maria Cesaroni & Mara Del Baldo & Paola Demartini & Paola Paoloni, 2015. "Entrepreneurial, Renewal and Trust Capital of Italian Firms: Insights from an Empirical Study," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 4(1), pages 69-89.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ratapol Wudhikarn & Nopasit Chakpitak & Gilles Neubert, 2020. "Improving the Strategic Benchmarking of Intellectual Capital Management in Logistics Service Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Ratapol Wudhikarn & Nopasit Chakpitak & Gilles Neubert, 2020. "Improving the Strategic Benchmarking of Intellectual Capital Management in Logistics Service Providers," Post-Print hal-03188190, HAL.
    3. G. Scott Erickson, 2013. "Role of governance in national innovation systems: from intellectual property to intellectual capital," Chapters, in: Mehmet Ugur (ed.), Governance, Regulation and Innovation, chapter 10, pages 239-261, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Mehmet Ugur (ed.), 2013. "Governance, Regulation and Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15264.
    5. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    6. Panagiotis Trivellas & Georgios Malindretos & Panagiotis Reklitis, 2020. "Implications of Green Logistics Management on Sustainable Business and Supply Chain Performance: Evidence from a Survey in the Greek Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-29, December.
    7. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Olunifesi Adekunle Suraj, 2016. "Managing Telecommunications for Development: An Analysis of Intellectual Capital in Nigerian Telecommunication Industry," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-30, March.
    9. Chin‐jung Luan & Chengli Tien & Pei‐hua Wu, 2013. "Strategizing Environmental Policy and Compliance for Firm Economic Sustainability: Evidence from Taiwanese Electronics Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 517-546, December.
    10. Adrian Gourlay & Jonathan Seaton, 2004. "The determinants of firm diversification in UK quoted companies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(18), pages 2059-2071.
    11. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    12. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    13. Filippo Carlo Wezel & Gino Cattani & Johannes M. Pennings, 2006. "Competitive Implications of Interfirm Mobility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 691-709, December.
    14. Christiana Müller & Stefan Vorbach, 2015. "Enabling Business Model Change: Evidence from High-Technology Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(1), pages 53-75.
    15. Allais, Olivier & Etilé, Fabrice & Lecocq, Sébastien, 2015. "Mandatory labels, taxes and market forces: An empirical evaluation of fat policies," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 27-44.
    16. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Cécile Fonrouge & Cécile Ayerbe, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations : études de cas et proposition d'une grille d'interprétation," Post-Print halshs-00696111, HAL.
    18. Helena Holter Antonsen & Dag Øivind Madsen, 2021. "Developing a Maturity Model for the Compliance Function of Investment Firms: A Preliminary Case Study from Norway," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-34, October.
    19. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    20. Vazquez, Pedro & Botero, Isabel C. & Arzubiaga, Unai & Memili, Esra, 2024. "What makes Latin American family firms different? Moving beyond cross-cultural comparisons," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Intellectual Capital; human capital; customer capital; structural capital and innovation capital; business performance; Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xiii:y:2010:i:3:p:145-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.