IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vviiy2019i1p64-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creative Self-Efficacy: A New Approach to Social Support and Creativity of SMEs’ Owners

Author

Listed:
  • Sri M. Setyawati
  • Yusmedi Nurfaizal
  • C. Dwiatmadja
  • Ade I. Anggraeni

Abstract

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) have a very important role in the economic equality of the community and have a high employment rate. This study examines the direct and indirect effects of social support and creative self-efficacy on the creativity of SMEs’ owners in Banyumas, Indonesia. The sample consists of 119 respondents obtained from Small and Medium business owners in this region. They complement the measure of social support and creative self-efficacy towards the creativity of SME’ owners. Structural equation modeling is used to test the proposed relationship between variables using the maximum likelihood estimation of the sample covariance matrix. The results show that social support, significantly positively influences creative self-efficacy and owner creativity, creative self-efficacy significantly influences the creativity of the owner. The findings also reveal that creative self-efficacy can mediate the relationship of social support with owner creativity. The implications of this study are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sri M. Setyawati & Yusmedi Nurfaizal & C. Dwiatmadja & Ade I. Anggraeni, 2019. "Creative Self-Efficacy: A New Approach to Social Support and Creativity of SMEs’ Owners," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 64-75.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:vii:y:2019:i:1:p:64-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijeba.com/journal/196/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karen Siedlecki & Timothy Salthouse & Shigehiro Oishi & Sheena Jeswani, 2014. "The Relationship Between Social Support and Subjective Well-Being Across Age," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 561-576, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dejan Ravselj & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2020. "The Relationship between Tax-Related Administrative Barriers and SMEs Characteristics: Evidence from Slovenia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 381-388.
    2. Alka Obadic & Dejan Ravselj & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2020. "Administrative Barriers in the Field of Employment in the EU: Empirical Evidence from Croatia and Slovenia," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 533-553.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Lühr & Maria K. Pavlova & Maike Luhmann, 2022. "They are Doing Well, but is it by Doing Good? Pathways from Nonpolitical and Political Volunteering to Subjective Well-Being in Age Comparison," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1969-1989, June.
    2. HangUk Cheon, 2021. "The Structural Relationship between Exercise Frequency, Social Health, and Happiness in Adolescents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Jun Zhang & Yuang He & Jing Zhang, 2022. "Energy Poverty and Depression in Rural China: Evidence from the Quantile Regression Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Ricarda Steinmayr & Linda Wirthwein & Laura Modler & Margaret M. Barry, 2019. "Development of Subjective Well-Being in Adolescence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Cristiano Scandurra & Benedetta Muzii & Roberto La Rocca & Francesco Di Bello & Mario Bottone & Gianluigi Califano & Nicola Longo & Nelson Mauro Maldonato & Francesco Mangiapia, 2022. "Social Support Mediates the Relationship between Body Image Distress and Depressive Symptoms in Prostate Cancer Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-10, April.
    6. Alaina N. English & Jennifer A. Bellingtier & Shevaun D. Neupert, 2019. "It’s “the Joneses”: the influence of objective and subjective socioeconomic status on subjective perceptions of aging," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 121-128, March.
    7. Wilfred Uunk & Paula Hoffmann, 2023. "Do Personality Traits Moderate the Effects of Cohabitation, Separation, and Widowhood on Life Satisfaction? A Longitudinal Test for Germany," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 141-157, January.
    8. Huimin Song & Wei Zeng & Tingting Zeng, 2022. "Modeling Community Residents’ Exercise Adherence and Life Satisfaction: An Application of the Influence of the Reference Group," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Myeong-Ah Seo & Young-Jin Lim, 2019. "Optimism and life satisfaction in persons with schizophrenia living in the community," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 65(7-8), pages 615-620, November.
    10. Maria Carella & Thaís García-Pereiro & Roberta Pace, 2022. "Subjective Well-Being, Transnational Families and Social Integration of Married Immigrants in Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 785-816, June.
    11. Rachel E. Dunifon & Kelly A. Musick & Christopher E. Near, 2020. "Time with Grandchildren: Subjective Well-Being Among Grandparents Living with Their Grandchildren," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 681-702, April.
    12. Nie, Peng & Li, Qiaoge & Sousa-Poza, Alfonso, 2021. "Energy poverty and subjective well-being in China: New evidence from the China Family Panel Studies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Chunpei Lin & Guanxi Zhao & Chuanpeng Yu & Yenchun Jim Wu, 2019. "Smart City Development and Residents’ Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Dmitrii Dubrov, 2017. "Family Social Capital as a Predictor of Parental and Adolescent Subjective Well-Being in Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 75/PSY/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    15. Eleanor Law & Janelle V Levesque & Sylvie Lambert & Afaf Girgis, 2018. "The “sphere of care”: A qualitative study of colorectal cancer patient and caregiver experiences of support within the cancer treatment setting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Natale Canale & Claudia Marino & Michela Lenzi & Alessio Vieno & Mark D. Griffiths & Marta Gaboardi & Matteo Giraldo & Carmen Cervone & Santinello Massimo, 2022. "How Communication Technology Fosters Individual and Social Wellbeing During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Preliminary Support For a Digital Interaction Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 727-745, February.
    17. Tinghui Li & Junhao Zhong & Mark Xu, 2019. "Does the Credit Cycle Have an Impact on Happiness?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. M. Pilar Matud & M. Concepción García & Demelza Fortes, 2019. "Relevance of Gender and Social Support in Self-Rated Health and Life Satisfaction in Elderly Spanish People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, July.
    19. YODO Masato & UCHIDA Atsuhiko, 2022. "How Much Is It Worth Not Being Alone? An empirical evaluation of social support using the life satisfaction approach in Japan," Discussion papers 22108, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    20. Christoph K. Becker & Stefan T. Trautmann, 2022. "Does Happiness Increase in Old Age? Longitudinal Evidence from 20 European Countries," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 3625-3654, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Indonesia; social support; creative self-efficacy; owner's creativity; Structural Equation Modeling.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G29 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:vii:y:2019:i:1:p:64-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijeba.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.