IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vixy2021i4p111-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Effect of Corporate Governance on the Audit Effort: The Case of Greek Port Authorities

Author

Listed:
  • Aggelia Xanthopoulou
  • Andreas Delegos
  • Petros Kalantonis
  • Panagiotis Arsenos

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this paper is to investigate the impact of corporate governance on the implementation of internal audits (ΙΑ) in the Greek public sector. Internal audit services have been adopted as a major strategy by the management of public organizations over the last decade in order to achieve their objectives in an efficient and effective manner. Under this framework, the present research investigates how the Board of Directors’ williness, support, and implementation of IA, improve public governance. Design/methodology/approach: Data for the study were gathered from the annual financial reports of 13 Port Authorities which have the legal status of Societies Anonymes, between 2012 and 2020. In the regression analysis, audit effort (audit team size) was chosen as dependent variable and as independent variables, the Board of Directors’ size, the BIG 5 audit firms and the implementation of internal audit function.To estimate internal audit economic models, various quantitative approaches such as ordinary least squares, weights least squares, fixed effect, and random effect were used. Findings: According to our findings, IA plays a crucial role in the corporate governance system by providing a systematic disciplined approach to monitoring public organizations’ policies and procedures and influencing their value. Organizations that completely outsource their IA have been influenced positively in terms of good governance. The high quality of outsourcing IA, has an impact on external auditors’ audit services, since external auditors adjust their strategy based on IA reports. Practical Implications: In case of Port Authorities, audit’s quality in both internal and external services affects their economic growth and investors’ attraction, since it enhances the transparency and accountability of financial reports. Originality/value: In Greece, internal audit was implemented in the public sector, for the first time, in 2005, but it became mandatory in 2019 (Law 4622/2019). Few organizations apply IAF until today, so there are few available information and data of IA’ effects on public governance and vice versa. Few researchers focus their studies on IA in public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Aggelia Xanthopoulou & Andreas Delegos & Petros Kalantonis & Panagiotis Arsenos, 2021. "Exploring the Effect of Corporate Governance on the Audit Effort: The Case of Greek Port Authorities," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 111-129.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:ix:y:2021:i:4:p:111-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijeba.com/journal/737/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suraj Srinivasan, 2005. "Consequences of Financial Reporting Failure for Outside Directors: Evidence from Accounting Restatements and Audit Committee Members," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 291-334, May.
    2. Iulian Bogdan Dobra & Attila Szora Tamas, 2009. "The Public Internal Audit Committee In The Social Health Insurance Sector- A Necessity In Romania," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-54.
    3. Divesh S. Sharma & Nava Subramaniam, 2005. "Outsourcing of Internal Audit Services in Australian Firms: Some Preliminary Evidence," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 1(1), pages 33-52.
    4. Barua, Abhijit & Rama, Dasaratha V & Sharma, Vineeta, 2010. "Audit committee characteristics and investment in internal auditing," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 503-513, September.
    5. Jenny Goodwin‐Stewart & Pamela Kent, 2006. "Relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics and internal audit," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(3), pages 387-404, September.
    6. Judith van Ravenstein & Georgios Georgakopoulos & Petros Kalantonis & Panagiotis Kaldis, 2013. "Does Audit Quality Influence the Relation between Earnings Management and Internal Control Weakness in the Post –SOX Period," International Journal of Sustainable Economies Management (IJSEM), IGI Global, vol. 2(2), pages 70-100, April.
    7. Eugeniu Ţurlea & Aurelia Ştefănescu, 2009. "Internal Audit And Risk Management In Public Sector Entities, Between Tradition And Actuality," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-20.
    8. Dominic S.B. Soh & Nonna Martinov-Bennie, 2011. "The internal audit function: Perceptions of internal audit roles, effectiveness and evaluation," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(7), pages 605-622, July.
    9. Mazlina Mat Zain & Nava Subramaniam, 2007. "Internal Auditor Perceptions on Audit Committee Interactions: a qualitative study in Malaysian public corporations," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 894-908, September.
    10. DeZoort, F. Todd & Hermanson, Dana R. & Houston, Richard W., 2003. "Audit committee support for auditors: The effects of materiality justification and accounting precision," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 175-199.
    11. Mark S. Beasley & Steven E. Salterio, 2001. "The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee Composition and Experience," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 539-570, December.
    12. Johnathan Magrane & Sue Malthus, 2010. "Audit committee effectiveness: a public sector case study," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(5), pages 427-443, May.
    13. Zimbelman, MF, 1997. "The effects of SAS no. 82 on auditors' attention to fraud risk factors and audit planning decisions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35, pages 75-97.
    14. Neculai Tabără & Mihaela Ungureanu, 2012. "Internal Audit And Its Role In Improving Corporate Governance Systems," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(14), pages 1-12.
    15. Peter Carey & Nava Subramaniam & Karin Chua Wee Ching, 2006. "Internal audit outsourcing in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(1), pages 11-30, March.
    16. Dessalegn Getie Mihret & Aderajew Wondim Yismaw, 2007. "Internal audit effectiveness: an Ethiopian public sector case study," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 22(5), pages 470-484, May.
    17. Achmad Dzulfikar Dzikrullah & Iman Harymawan & Melinda Cahyaning Ratri, 2020. "Internal audit functions and audit outcomes: Evidence from Indonesia," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1750331-175, January.
    18. Stuart Turley & Mahbub Zaman, 2004. "The Corporate Governance Effects of Audit Committees," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 8(3), pages 305-332, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. Piot & L. Kermiche, 2009. "A quoi servent les comités d'audit ? Un regard sur la recherche empirique," Post-Print halshs-00537952, HAL.
    2. Wan-Hussin, Wan Nordin & Fitri, Hadiati & Salim, Basariah, 2021. "Audit committee chair overlap, chair expertise, and internal auditing practices: Evidence from Malaysia," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    3. David Hay & Jenny Stewart & Nives Botica Redmayne, 2017. "The Role of Auditing in Corporate Governance in Australia and New Zealand: A Research Synthesis," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 457-479, December.
    4. George Drogalas & Michail Nerantzidis & Dimitrios Mitskinis & Ioannis Tampakoudis, 2021. "The relationship between audit fees and audit committee characteristics: evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 24-41, March.
    5. Isabel Z. Wang & Neil Fargher, 2017. "The effects of tone at the top and coordination with external auditors on internal auditors’ fraud risk assessments," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(4), pages 1177-1202, December.
    6. Mahfuja Malik, 2014. "Audit committee composition and effectiveness: a review of post-SOX literature," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 81-117, October.
    7. Shivan Sarpal, 2017. "Analyzing Performance Implications of Selected Audit Committee Characteristics: A Study of Indian Corporate Sector," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 5(2), pages 137-150, July.
    8. Mélanie Roussy & Alexandre Perron, 2018. "New Perspectives in Internal Audit Research: A Structured Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 345-385, September.
    9. Cristina Boţa-Avram, 2012. "Perceptions Over the Audit Committee Practices in the Context of Corporate Governance: Evidence From Romania," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 2(5), pages 1-11, October.
    10. Ines Maraghni & Mehdi Nekhili, 2017. "Audit committee characteristics and audit fees: Evidence from France [Caractéristiques du comité d’audit et honoraires d’audit : cas des entreprises françaises]," Post-Print hal-01907594, HAL.
    11. Jenny Stewart & Nava Subramaniam, 2010. "Internal audit independence and objectivity: emerging research opportunities," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(4), pages 328-360, April.
    12. Alzeban, Abdulaziz & Sawan, Nedal, 2015. "The impact of audit committee characteristics on the implementation of internal audit recommendations," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 61-71.
    13. Lanfeng Kao & Min-Hsien Chiang & Anlin Chen, 2024. "To mitigate the effect of underwriter bargaining power on IPO pricing through audit committee under an economy of little information asymmetry," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 147-167, July.
    14. Ines Maraghni & Mehdi Nekhili & Tawhid Chtioui, 2016. "Caractéristiques du comité d'audit et étendue du reporting sur le contrôle interne : cas des entreprises françaises," Post-Print hal-01901185, HAL.
    15. Melinda Timea Fülöp, 2013. "Correlation Analysis of the Audit Committee and Profitability Indicators," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 139-148.
    16. Jean Bédard & Suzanne M. Paquette, 2021. "Audit Committee Financial Expertise, Litigation Risk, and Auditor‐Provided Tax Services†," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 7-48, March.
    17. Iwasaki, Ichiro & 岩﨑, 一郎, 2013. "What Determines Audit Independence and Expertise in Russia? Firm-Level Evidence," RRC Working Paper Series 27_v2, Russian Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    18. Sierra-García, Laura & Gambetta, Nicolás & García-Benau, María A. & Orta-Pérez, Manuel, 2019. "Understanding the determinants of the magnitude of entity-level risk and account-level risk key audit matters: The case of the United Kingdom," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 227-240.
    19. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca-Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina-Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu & Melinda Timea Fülöp & Dan Ioan Topor, 2020. "The Influence of Corporate Governance Systems on a Company’s Market Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Amad Rashid & Basariah Salim & Halimah Nasibah Ahmad, 2021. "Internal Audit Effectiveness and Audit Committee Characteristics:Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 3(1), pages 1-13, june.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate governance; internal audit; outsourcing; external auditors; BIG 5.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijebaa:v:ix:y:2021:i:4:p:111-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijeba.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.