IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Democratically Accountable External Action Service: Three Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Bátora, Jozef

Abstract

Democratic accountability is an aspect that seems to have been almost entirely overlooked in the discussions on the evolving role of the European External Action Service (EEAS). In modern democratic societies, it is increasingly difficult to sustain the claim that foreign policy and diplomacy are incompatible with democratic decision-making and accountability. What is more, for the external service representing the EU as an entity aspiring to play the role of a mentor in state- and democracy-building processes in various countries around the world, ensuring democratic accountability necessarily becomes a key concern. While this is the case, the literature on the EEAS has at best only partially addressed this issue so far. This article seeks to bridge that gap and discuss ways of how democratic accountability could be ensured in the EEAS in its various possible organizational configurations. It hence addresses some of the key issues addressed by this special issue – institutionalization of administrative arrangements in support of the ESDP, the role of non-elected officials in the EU’s external relations and, indeed, evolving mechanisms for ensuring political control of the EU’s external action. In the first section, the paper discusses the notion of democratic accountability and reviews the state of the debate regarding democratic accountability in the EEAS. Three models of a democratic order in the EU are then suggested (cf Eriksen and Fossum) and based on those, three scenarios of developing democratic accountability in the EEAS are elaborated upon - the EEAS as a support agency for member state diplomacy; the EEAS as a federal foreign service of the EU; and the EEAS as a cosmopolitan normative entrepreneur.

Suggested Citation

  • Bátora, Jozef, 2010. "A Democratically Accountable External Action Service: Three Scenarios," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2010-013a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2010-013.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Elizabeth Stie, 2008. "Decision-making void of democratic qualities?An evaluation of the EU’s foreign and security policy," RECON Online Working Papers Series 20, RECON.
    2. Anne Elizabeth Stie, 2008. "Decision-Making Void of Democratic Qualities? An Evaluation of the EU’s Foreign and Security Policy," ARENA Working Papers 24, ARENA.
    3. Juncos, Ana E.; Pomorska, Karolina, 2006. "Playing the Brussels game: Strategic socialisation in the CFSP Council Working Groups," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 10, September.
    4. Erik Oddvar Eriksen & John Erik Fossum, 2007. "Europe in Transformation: How to Reconstitute Democracy?," RECON Online Working Papers Series 1, RECON.
    5. Helene Sjursen, 2007. "Integration without democracy? Three conceptions of European Security Policy in transformation," RECON Online Working Papers Series 19, RECON.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stie, Anne Elizabeth, 2010. "Decision-making Void of Democratic Qualities? An Evaluation of the EU’s Second Pillar Decision-making Procedure," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    2. James P. Cross, 2012. "Interventions and negotiation in the Council of Ministers of the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 13(1), pages 47-69, March.
    3. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Michal Natorski & Karolina Pomorska, 2017. "Trust and Decision-making in Times of Crisis: The EU's Response to the Events in Ukraine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 54-70, January.
    4. Henrik Scheller & Annegret Eppler, 2014. "European Disintegration – non-existing Phenomenon or a Blind Spot of European Integration Research? Preliminary Thoughts for a Research Agenda," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 2, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    5. Vanhoonacker, Sophie & Dijkstra, Hylke & Maurer Heidi, 2010. "Understanding the Role of Bureaucracy in the European Security and Defence Policy: The State of the Art," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    6. Christopher Lord, 2008. "Some indicators of the democratic performance of the European Union and how they might relate to the RECON models," RECON Online Working Papers Series 11, RECON.
    7. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski, 2017. "What Type of Power has the EU Exercised in the Ukraine–Russia Crisis? A Framework of Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 3-19, January.
    8. Peters, Dirk & Wagner, Wolfgang & Deitelhoff, Nicole, 2010. "Parliaments and European security policy. Mapping the Parliamentary Field," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    9. Patrick Müller & David Gazsi, 2023. "Populist Capture of Foreign Policy Institutions: The Orbán Government and the De‐Europeanization of Hungarian Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 397-415, March.
    10. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Helene Sjursen & Guri Rosén, 2017. "Arguing Sanctions. On the EU's Response to the Crisis in Ukraine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 20-36, January.
    11. Ömer UÐUR, 2016. "The Europranization of national Foreign Policies: The Examples og germany and France within the Framework of Ukraine Crisis," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 527-536, September.
    12. Daniel Finke, 2020. "EU enlargement and foreign policy coordination: more powerful, but less cohesive?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 189-210, January.
    13. Dionysia Tamvaki, 2009. "Using Eurobarometer data on voter participation in the 2004 European elections to test the RECON models," RECON Online Working Papers Series 13, RECON.
    14. Patrick Müller and Nicole Alecu de Flers, 2009. "Applying the Concept of Europeanization to the Study of Foreign Policy: Dimensions and Mechanisms," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 5, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    15. Hans-Jörg Trenz, Nadine Bernhard & Erik Jentges, 2009. "Civil society and EU constitution-making: Towards a European social constituency?," RECON Online Working Papers Series 7, RECON.
    16. Frédéric Mérand & Stéphanie C. Hofmann & Bastien Irondelle, 2011. "Governance and State Power: A Network Analysis of European Security," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 121-147, January.
    17. Hrant KOSTANYAN & Bruno VANDECASTEELE, 2013. "The socialization potential of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 4, pages 95-110, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.