IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Images of the EU in EPA negotiations: Angel, demon - or just human?

Author

Listed:
  • Elgström, Ole

Abstract

A striking feature of the discourses surrounding the negotiations of Economic Partnership Agreements between the EU and developing states is the starkly contrasting pictures given of the role and nature of the EU. The Union is either portrayed as an angel, an actor with altruistic objectives, concerned primarily with the economic and social development of the ACP countries, or as a demon, an actor driven by self-interest with an hidden agenda and using confrontational tactics. The first image is mainly held by Commission officials, the second by NGO representatives. In this article, I establish the existence of the two contrasting images, try to explain theoretically the nature of the debate by reference to cognitive theory, and discuss the potential consequences of constructing and utilizing black-and-white images. I argue that the EU risked being caught in rhetorical traps by describing itself in overly altruistic terms, thereby giving its counterparts argumentative advantages. NGOs, on the other hand, lost some of their possibilities of influencing EU policy by taking a totally confrontational stance.

Suggested Citation

  • Elgström, Ole, 2008. "Images of the EU in EPA negotiations: Angel, demon - or just human?," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2008-005a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2008-005.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levy, Jack S., 1994. "Learning and foreign policy: sweeping a conceptual minefield," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 279-312, April.
    2. Herrmann, Richard K. & Fischerkeller, Michael P., 1995. "Beyond the enemy image and spiral model: cognitive–strategic research after the cold war," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 415-450, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petrov, Petar, 2010. "Early Institutionalisation of the ESDP Governance Arrangements: Insights From Operations Concordia and Artemis," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    2. Eric Tremolada Álvarez (editor), 2015. "La arquitectura del ordenamiento internacional y su desarrollo en materia económica," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, edition 1, number 785.
    3. Luis N. Zúñiga-Morales & Jorge Ángel González-Ordiano & J. Emilio Quiroz-Ibarra & César Villanueva Rivas, 2024. "Machine learning framework for country image analysis," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 523-547, April.
    4. Beth Simmons & Jens Hainmueller, 2005. "Can Domestic Institutions Explain Exchange Rate Regime Choice? The Political Economy of Monetary Institutions Reconsidered," International Finance 0505011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Covadonga Meseguer, 2005. "Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 598(1), pages 67-82, March.
    6. Paul F. Diehl, 2006. "Just a Phase?: Integrating Conflict Dynamics Over Time," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(3), pages 199-210, July.
    7. Brian Lai & Dan Reiter, 2000. "Democracy, Political Similarity, and International Alliances, 1816-1992," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 44(2), pages 203-227, April.
    8. Ben D. Mor & Zeev Maoz, 1999. "Learning and the Evolution of Enduring International Rivalries: a Strategic Approach," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 17(1), pages 1-48, February.
    9. Katja Biedenkopf, 2012. "Emissions Trading - A Transatlantic Journey for an Idea?," KFG Working Papers p0045, Free University Berlin.
    10. Mark J.C. Crescenzi & Andrew J. Enterline & Stephen B. Long, 2008. "Bringing Cooperation Back In: A Dynamic Model of Interstate Interaction," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 25(3), pages 264-280, July.
    11. Andrew Geddes, 2014. "Relationships between Research and Policy on Migration in the European Union: A Practice-Based Analysis," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers p0363, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    12. Serdar Ş. Güner, 2004. "Aegean Territorial Waters Conflict: An Evolutionary Narrative," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(4), pages 297-312, September.
    13. Nedergaard, Peter, 2005. "Transnational learning processes: European and Nordic experiences in the employment field," MPRA Paper 33104, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Matúš Mišík, 2013. "How can perception help us to understand the dynamic between EU member states? The state of the art," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 445-463, December.
    15. Lars-Erik Cederman & Mohan Penubarti Rao, 2001. "Exploring the Dynamics of the Democratic Peace," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 45(6), pages 818-833, December.
    16. Chris Ogden, 2013. "Tracing the Pakistan–Terrorism Nexus in Indian Security Perspectives: From 1947 to 26/11," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 69(1), pages 35-50, March.
    17. Heidi Hardt, 2018. "Who matters for memory: Sources of institutional memory in international organization crisis management," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 457-482, September.
    18. Stephen Kaplan, 2016. "Fighting Past Economic Wars: Crisis and Austerity in Latin America," Working Papers 2015-13, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    19. Stephen B. Kaplan, 2014. "Political Economy of Macroeconomic Policymaking: Economic Crises and Technocratic Governance," Working Papers 2014-18, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    20. Lauge N. Skovgaard Poulsen & Emma Aisbett, 2011. "When the Claim Hits: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bounded Rational Learning," Crawford School Research Papers 1105, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.