IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/qrampp/v4y2007i1p69-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the benefits and use of flexitime: similarities and differences

Author

Listed:
  • Jarrod M. Haar

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to understand the benefits of flexitime amongst users and non‐users, and determine what flexitime is used for by employees using a gender perspective. Design/methodology/approach - The study consisted of interviews of 30 employees of a New Zealand local‐government organisation, including 22 users and eight non‐users of flexitime. Social exchange theory was used to test the benefits of flexitime towards job attitudes and work‐family balance, while the socialisation perspective was used to explore flexitime usage divided into use by gender and parental status. Findings - Employees were highly positive of flexitime, including the eight non‐users. Further, many positive comments were made regarding the important role that flexitime plays in allowing employees to balance their work and family commitments. Analysis showed that while there were no differences between males and females who had no dependants, there were major differences between parents. Mothers, exclusively used their flexitime to support their mothering role like attending school events, while fathers used flexitime for personal activities such as exercise. Research limitations/implications - A limitation of this research is the small sample of employees interviewed. Implications are that flexitime is a very positive work‐family practice with universal appeal to all employees including non‐users. However, this may come at the expense of reinforcing gendered roles for working mothers and fathers. Future research is needed to determine whether the flexitime usage by gender is universal, and whether working parents see the reinforcing of gender roles as a negative. Originality/value - This paper undertakes one of the few examinations of employee usage of flexitime by gender and parental status, and clearly provides insights that can aid the work‐family and gender literature. It also reinforces the value of a work‐family practice to users and non‐users alike.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarrod M. Haar, 2007. "Exploring the benefits and use of flexitime: similarities and differences," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(1), pages 69-82, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:qrampp:v:4:y:2007:i:1:p:69-82
    DOI: 10.1108/11766090710732514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/11766090710732514/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/11766090710732514/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/11766090710732514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:sae:niesru:v:168:y::i:1:p:99-116 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coenen, Marja & Kok, Robert A.W., 2014. "Workplace flexibility and new product development performance: The role of telework and flexible work schedules," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 564-576.
    2. Berkery, Elaine & Morley, Michael J. & Tiernan, Siobhán & Peretz, Hilla, 2020. "From start to finish: Flexi-time as a social exchange and its impact on organizational outcomes," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 591-601.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:qrampp:v:4:y:2007:i:1:p:69-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.