IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mrrpps/v36y2013i2p153-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The measurement of internal supply chain integration

Author

Listed:
  • Chuda Basnet

Abstract

Purpose - Internal supply chain refers to the chain of activities within a company that concludes with providing a product to the customer. This process involves multiple functions within companies such as sales, production, and distribution. It is obvious that a company's performance would be enhanced by the integration of these functions. However, there is no consensus yet on how integration is to be defined and measured. The purpose of this paper is to present research that was conducted with the goal of developing an instrument for the measurement of internal supply chain integration. Design/methodology/approach - Scale items were identified from current literature and the resulting survey instrument was sent out to a sample of New Zealand manufacturers. Statistical analysis was conducted to purify and validate the instrument. Findings - In total, three dimensions of integration were identified, labelled coordination, communication, and affective relationship. This paper makes a contribution towards developing a consensus in the understanding and measurement of the integration construct. Research limitations/implications - The selection and exclusion of measurement items for the survey have followed established principles of survey research, but may have been affected by the personal bias of the author. While every attempt has been made to comprehensively capture the state of the research up to the time of the study, there may be some omissions. The sample for the survey was drawn from a database of New Zealand businesses, thus the results are generalizable only to the extent that these businesses represent the population of all businesses. Another limitation is that no prior survey/case studies were carried out to collect practitioner's definitions/measures for integration. Practical implications - The authors hope to have made a contribution here towards building a consensus among practitioners and researchers in defining and measuring internal supply chain integration. For practitioners, the measurement instrument offers a self‐assessment tool for internal supply chain integration. This should help them in identifying areas for improvement. Originality/value - The contribution of this paper consists of: development of an instrument for the measurement of integration, validating the instrument against a criterion, and the identification of three dimensions of integration – communication, coordination, and affective relationship. The unique contributions of this paper are the validation of the instrument against a criterion and the identification of “affective relationship” as a dimension of internal supply chain integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuda Basnet, 2013. "The measurement of internal supply chain integration," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(2), pages 153-172, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:36:y:2013:i:2:p:153-172
    DOI: 10.1108/01409171311292252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01409171311292252/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01409171311292252/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/01409171311292252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zohreh Sadeghi & Reza Farzipoor Saen & Mahdi Moradzadehfard, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Developing a network data envelopment analysis model for appraising sustainable supply chains: a sustainability accounting approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 809-824, December.
    2. Mahmoud Fallatah, 2019. "Offshoring and Organizational Innovation: The Moderating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Inter-Functional Integration," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(10), pages 57-63, October.
    3. Rameshwar Dubey & Nezih Altay & Constantin Blome, 2019. "Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 159-177, December.
    4. Iman Harymawan & Mohammad Nasih & Dian Agustia & Fajar Kristanto Gautama Putra & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta, 2022. "Investment efficiency and environmental, social, and governance reporting: Perspective from corporate integration management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1186-1202, September.
    5. Jorge Tarifa Fernández & Jerónimo de Burgos Jiménez & José Joaquín Céspedes Lorente, 2019. "The effect of supply chain integration and environmental proactivity on environmental performance. The case of the horticultural spanish sector," DOCFRADIS Working Papers 1905, Catedra Fundación Ramón Areces de Distribución Comercial, revised Jul 2019.
    6. Mask, Rickey & Works, Richard, 2018. "How Social Capital, Supply Chain Integration, and Customer Loyalty Affect Performance," MPRA Paper 91332, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Justice Odei Som & Hod Anyigba, 2022. "Examining the Effects of Information Systems Usage and Managerial Commitment on Supply Chain Performance: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Integration," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:v:36:y:2013:i:2:p:153-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.