IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mrrpps/mrr-10-2015-0236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the facilitators and mediators of workforce agility: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Ashutosh Muduli

Abstract

Purpose - Recognizing that very less number of research has been conducted on workforce agility, the current research aimed to examine the impact of organizational practices in the form of organizational learning and training, compensation, involvement, team work and information system (IS) on workforce agility. Influenced by the “Black Box” approach, the study also examined the role of psychological empowerment as a mechanism mediating the relationship between organizational practices and workforce agility. Design/methodology/approach - The study has been conducted in selective Indian industries, representing manufacturing and service sector across public and private sectors. Quantitative and qualitative data have been collected from both executives and non-executives through reliable instruments validated in Indian context. Data have been analyzed using descriptive analysis, canonical correlation analysis and multiple regression. Findings - Findings that organizational practices significantly related to workforce agility prove that organizational practices are capable of improving the agile attributes and behavior of the workforce. In detail, team work has the greatest influence on workforce agility, followed by Reward system, employee involvement, organizational learning and training and ISs. Further, the study result also proved the mediating role of psychological empowerment between organizational practices and workforce agility. Practical implications - Organizations are to design practices related to organizational learning and training, compensation, involvement, team work and IS and implement them efficiently and effectively to enable agility within the workforce, as an agile workforce can only respond proactively to a volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous business environment. Further, the result also suggests that managers should design the organizational practices capable of enhancing psychological empowerment, as the combination can deliver better workforce agility. Originality/value - The research is useful considering very less number of research on workforce agility.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashutosh Muduli, 2016. "Exploring the facilitators and mediators of workforce agility: an empirical study," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(12), pages 1567-1586, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-10-2015-0236
    DOI: 10.1108/MRR-10-2015-0236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MRR-10-2015-0236/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MRR-10-2015-0236/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/MRR-10-2015-0236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lukas Heidt & Felix Gauger & Andreas Pfnür, 2023. "Work from Home Success: Agile work characteristics and the Mediating Effect of supportive HRM," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 2139-2164, August.
    2. Franco, Chiara & Landini, Fabio, 2022. "Organizational drivers of innovation: The role of workforce agility," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    3. Maran, Thomas K. & Liegl, Simon & Davila, Andrés & Moder, Sebastian & Kraus, Sascha & Mahto, Raj V., 2022. "Who fits into the digital workplace? Mapping digital self-efficacy and agility onto psychological traits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Anca-Ioana Munteanu & Nicolae Bibu & Marian Nastase & Nicoleta Cristache & Cosmin Matis, 2020. "Analysis of Practices to Increase the Workforce Agility and to Develop a Sustainable and Competitive Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Mohammed Usman & Dr. Ibrahim Garba Muhammad & Dr. Najafi Auwal Ibrahim, 2020. "Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on Non-Monetary Compensation and Employee Performance at Federal University of Kashere Gombe State," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(10), pages 367-373, October.
    6. AlNuaimi, Bader K. & Kumar Singh, Sanjay & Ren, Shuang & Budhwar, Pawan & Vorobyev, Dmitriy, 2022. "Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 636-648.
    7. Sanjeet Kumar Sameer, 2024. "The Interplay of digitalization, organizational support, workforce agility and task performance in a blended working environment: evidence from Indian public sector organizations," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 266-286, April.
    8. Nagamani Subramanian & M. Suresh, 2022. "Assessment Framework for Agile HRM Practices," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(1), pages 135-149, March.
    9. Bora Ly, 2024. "The Interplay of Digital Transformational Leadership, Organizational Agility, and Digital Transformation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4408-4427, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-10-2015-0236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.