IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jpifpp/v27y2009i4p413-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient markets versus behavioral anomalies: the case of REITs

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Joel‐Carbonell
  • Nico B. Rottke

Abstract

Purpose - This paper seeks to research potential evidence of capital market irregularities by scrutinizing whether the IPO (Initial Public Offering) phenomenon can be found in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Design/methodology/approach - The study employs stock price data of 90 US REITs and derives their performance on the first trading day, but also on a one‐, three‐, and five‐year basis. Findings - The primary offerings puzzle frequently observed in traditional IPOs is a market imperfection that also exists for REITs from 1991 to 2008. REITs display, on average, both significant first trading day under‐pricing and negative aftermarket performance, predominantly on a five‐year basis. Research limitations/implications - The research at hand offers evidence that stock irregularities can be found within the US REIT industry, albeit these do not necessarily serve as evidence against efficient markets. Notwithstanding the fact that it may be difficult to exploit the abnormal performance on the first day, investors can nonetheless earn substantial profits by shorting IPO stocks on a long‐term basis. Even net of transaction costs, such a strategy should have a positive abnormal return. However, these investments have to be executed cautiously as the profitability of such a strategy has to pay attention to the reputation of the underwriter, the cycle in which the IPO takes place and various other important factors. Originality/value - The research at hand offers evidence that REIT market irregularities oppose underlying rational human behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Joel‐Carbonell & Nico B. Rottke, 2009. "Efficient markets versus behavioral anomalies: the case of REITs," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(4), pages 413-424, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jpifpp:v:27:y:2009:i:4:p:413-424
    DOI: 10.1108/14635780910972314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14635780910972314/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14635780910972314/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/14635780910972314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Su Chan & Jiajin Chen & Ko Wang, 2013. "Are REIT IPOs Unique? The Global Evidence," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 719-759, November.
    2. Bill Dimovski & Christopher Ratcliffe & Monica Keneley, 2017. "Another piece of the puzzle: REIT IPO underpricing after the financial crisis," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3), pages 264-276, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jpifpp:v:27:y:2009:i:4:p:413-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.