Author
Listed:
- Merve Kılıç
- Ali Uyar
- Cemil Kuzey
- Abdullah S. Karaman
Abstract
Purpose - The objective of this study is to investigate whether the institutional environment is associated with the adoption of integrated reporting. Design/methodology/approach - The sample of the study is based on the firms included in the list of Fortune Global 500. The logistic regression analysis was run to test the proposed hypotheses. Findings - The findings indicated that the code-law orientation and strength of the institutional quality are significantly associated (i.e. positively and negatively, respectively) with the integrated reporting of Fortune 500 companies. Firms are motivated for more transparency in stakeholder-oriented and weakly regulated contexts. Thus, stakeholder pressure is more influential than shareholder interest in motivating or forcing firms to issue integrated reports. Besides, there appears to be a trade-off between the public sector and the private sector in terms of ensuring an accountable and transparent business environment. If the public sector does not undertake its role in ensuring a transparent business environment, the private sector fills the gap. The results are robust to alternative sampling and methodologies. Research limitations/implications - This study implied that the stakeholder orientation of countries fosters the transparency and accountability of firms. Corporate behavior is impacted by the institutional strength or weakness of nations. The institutional theory provides an appropriate ground to understand drivers of corporate reporting practices of firms beyond firm-level characteristics. Practical implications - The adoption of integrated reporting framework by Fortune 500 companies can be leveraged to alleviate concerns about their social and environmental impacts. Policy-makers in the countries which have a weak institutional environment force or encourage their firms to increasingly meet the transparency and accountability demands of society. Social implications - The research findings might play an encouraging role in that various stakeholders (i.e. customers, public, civil organizations and press) should undertake active roles and responsibilities to encourage firms to behave in socially and environmentally responsible ways. Originality/value - This study adds to the literature by examining the influence of the institutional environment on the adoption of integrated reporting, using recent international data, and focusing on the largest companies according to the Fortune's annual Global 500 list. This study is one of the first to examine the association between a set of governance characteristics (i.e. board size, board independence and board diversity) and integrated reporting adoption.
Suggested Citation
Merve Kılıç & Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2020.
"Does institutional theory explain integrated reporting adoption of Fortune 500 companies?,"
Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(1), pages 114-137, November.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jaarpp:jaar-04-2020-0068
DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-04-2020-0068
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Amal Hamrouni & Abdullah S Karaman & Cemil Kuzey & Ali Uyar, 2023.
"Ethical environment, accountability, and sustainability reporting: What is the connection in the hospitality and tourism industry?,"
Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(3), pages 664-695, May.
- Uyar, Ali & Wasiuzzaman, Shaista & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2022.
"Board structure and financial stability of financial firms: Do board policies and CEO duality matter?,"
Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
- Kar Shun Wong & Azlan Amran & Ei Yet Chu, 2023.
"Institutional antecedents of integrated reporting quality: The moderating role of board independence,"
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 621-640, March.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:jaar-04-2020-0068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.