IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/inmrpp/inmr-10-2018-0075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dimensions that influence the innovation process in justice organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Marilú Pereira Castro
  • Tomas Aquino Guimaraes

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify dimensions that can influence the innovation process in justice organizations. Design/methodology/approach - This study uses a qualitative approach. Data were collected through a semi-structured interview script. In all, 23 in-depth interviews were undertaken with lawyers, public defenders, judges, prosecutors and public officials from the five regions of Brazil. These data were analyzed using content analysis techniques. Findings - The perceptions of the interviewees show that the process of innovation in justice organizations can be influenced by five dimensions: Institutional Environment (institutional level), Leadership (organizational level), Organizational Resources (organizational level), Cooperative Relations (interorganizational level) and Innovative Behavior (individual level). These dimensions may promote or restrict innovation. Originality/value - The results indicate that there are growing efforts to introduce innovations designed to improve the performance and service delivery of justice organizations. However, there is resistance to innovation because these organizations are highly institutionalized and consequently seek stability and absence of change.

Suggested Citation

  • Marilú Pereira Castro & Tomas Aquino Guimaraes, 2020. "Dimensions that influence the innovation process in justice organizations," Innovation & Management Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(2), pages 215-231, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:inmrpp:inmr-10-2018-0075
    DOI: 10.1108/INMR-10-2018-0075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/INMR-10-2018-0075/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/INMR-10-2018-0075/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/INMR-10-2018-0075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thiago Maia Sayão de Moraes & Marcos de Moraes Sousa, 2024. "History Matters: The Institutionalization and Innovation Paradox in the Judiciary," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:inmrpp:inmr-10-2018-0075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.