IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijsepp/v39y2012i9p721-737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the persistence of subsistence work in contemporary economies

Author

Listed:
  • Colin C. Williams
  • Peter Rodgers

Abstract

Purpose - Contrary to the view that the subsistence economy is some minor residue persisting in only a few peripheral enclaves of modern economies, the purpose of this paper is to begin to chart the importance and prevalence of subsistence work across the contemporary economic landscape and the reasons underpinning engagement in this form of non‐commodified labour. Design/methodology/approach - To do so, the extent of, and reasons for, subsistence production amongst those living in contemporary Moscow is evaluated using face‐to‐face interviews with 313 households in affluent, mixed and deprived districts. Findings - It was found that subsistence work is a ubiquitous phenomenon which is relied on heavily by Muscovite households. Until now, those participating in such subsistence work have been portrayed either as rational economic actors, dupes, seekers of self‐identity, or simply doing so out of necessity or choice. Rather than depict one as correct and the others as invalid, this survey inductively generates a theoretically‐integrative approach which differentiates between “willing” (rational economic actors, choice, identity seeking) and “reluctant” (economic and market necessity, dupes) participants in subsistence production. Research limitations/implications - The paper examines only one city. Further research is now required into the extent of, and reasons for, subsistence production in the rest of Central and Eastern Europe, as well as beyond. Originality/value - This is one of the first papers to identify and explain the ubiquitous persistence of subsistence work in contemporary economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin C. Williams & Peter Rodgers, 2012. "Evaluating the persistence of subsistence work in contemporary economies," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(9), pages 721-737, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:v:39:y:2012:i:9:p:721-737
    DOI: 10.1108/03068291211245736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03068291211245736/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03068291211245736/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/03068291211245736?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byung–Yeon Kim, 2002. "The participation of Russian households in the informal economy: Evidence from the VTsIOM data," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 10(3), pages 689-717, November.
    2. Maggie Davidson & Philip Leather, 2000. "Choice or necessity? A review of the role of DIY in tackling housing repair and maintenance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 747-756.
    3. Esther de Ruijter & Jeroen Weesie, 2007. "Working your Way in," Rationality and Society, , vol. 19(1), pages 35-64, February.
    4. Bogdon, Amy S., 1996. "Homeowner Renovation and Repair: The Decision to Hire Someone Else to Do the Project," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 323-350, December.
    5. Colin C. Williams, 2010. "Beyond the market/non‐market divide: a total social organisation of labour perspective," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(6), pages 402-414, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gyourko, Joseph & Saiz, Albert, 2004. "Reinvestment in the housing stock: the role of construction costs and the supply side," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 238-256, March.
    2. Colin C. Williams & Sara Nadin & Peter Rodgers & John Round & Jan Windebank, 2011. "Mapping the Social Organization of Labour in Moscow: Beyond the Formal/informal Labour Dualism," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(1), pages 43-53, February.
    3. Kim, Byung-Yeon, 2010. "Informal Economy Activities and Entrepreneurship in Russia," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Hannover 2010 55, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    4. Harding, John P. & Miceli, Thomas J. & Sirmans, C. F., 2000. "Deficiency Judgments and Borrower Maintenance: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 267-285, December.
    5. Byung‐Yeon Kim, 2005. "Poverty and informal economy participation," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 13(1), pages 163-185, January.
    6. Ioannidis, Yiorgos, 2013. "The peculiar distributional character of the Greek taxation system (1995‐2008) and the reform that never took place," MPRA Paper 52121, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Marco Wolf & Shaun McQuitty, 2011. "Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 1(3), pages 154-170, December.
    8. Wen-Chieh Wu & Yu-Chun Ma & Steven C. Bourassa, 2018. "Folk Customs and Home Improvement Decisions," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 21(3), pages 317-341.
    9. Cohen, Nissim & Rubinchik, Anna & Shami, Labib, 2020. "Towards a cashless economy: Economic and socio-political implications," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    10. Muhammad Ilyas & Arif ud din & Muhammad Haleem & Irshad Ahmad, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurial acceptance: an examination of technology acceptance model and do-it-yourself behavior," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Ishikawa, Noriko & Fukushige, Mototsugu, 2010. "Households' attitudes toward earthquake protection: An empirical analysis of the impact of fiscal support in Japan," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 51-65, March.
    12. Murray, Tim & Dunn, Richard A., 2022. "Household production, home improvement, and housing investment among older Americans," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Peter Lindner & Thomas Y. Mathä & Giuseppe Pulina & Michael Ziegelmeyer, 2020. "Borrowing constraints, own labour and homeownership: Does it pay to paint your walls?," BCL working papers 148, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    14. Peter E. Earl & Ti-Ching Peng, 2011. "Home Improvements," Chapters, in: Samuel Cameron (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Leisure, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Colin C. Williams & Abbi Kedir & Meryem Fethi & Sara Nadin, 2012. "Evaluating 'Varieties of Capitalism' by the Extent and Nature of the Informal Economy: The Case of South-Eastern Europe," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 10(2), pages 113-130.
    16. Colin Williams & Brunilda Kosta, 2021. "Why do Consumers Buy from Informal Sector Suppliers in East-Central Europe? A Case Study of Home Repair and Renovation Services," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 134-152, March.
    17. Andrew F. Haughwout & Sarah Sutherland & Joseph Tracy, 2013. "Negative equity and housing investment," Staff Reports 636, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    18. Ioannidis, Yiorgos, 2015. "The political economy of the distributional character of the Greek taxation system (1995–2008)," MPRA Paper 64033, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Ti-Ching Peng, 2013. "An Institutional Economic Analysis of the Decision to Do-it-yourself in Housing Renovation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(9), pages 1796-1816, July.
    20. Helms, Andrew C., 2003. "Understanding gentrification: an empirical analysis of the determinants of urban housing renovation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 474-498, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:v:39:y:2012:i:9:p:721-737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.