IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijsepp/v37y2010i8p562-573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is inclusive government more humane? Perspective on food availability in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Azeem Qureshi
  • Ayaz Muhammad

Abstract

Purpose - In view of the paradox of soaring malnutrition prevalence in an agrarian economy like Pakistan, political and economic pundits are of the opinion that Pakistan may face acute shortage of food in future if its political managers do not take holistic approach to address the issue. The form of government system is one such dimension of this approach. Pakistan has witnessed different forms of government system. The purpose of this paper is to assess the food availability situation under different regimes in Pakistan since 1972. Design/methodology/approach - The paper uses log‐lin growth model to make out if form of the government may affect the level of food availability in Pakistan. Findings - The data indicate lot of variations between different regimes. Over the years consistent and positive public policies for demographic management brought down the population growth rate. It was expected that positive demographic development coupled with supplementary policies will provide space to ensure sufficient food and standard nutrition to the people but this variable also could not contribute according to expectations. Prevailing inequity in society along with inconsistent policies and mismanagement of resources are generally quoted as the main reasons for this misfortune. However, the paper demonstrates that vertical power structure and absence of inclusive political system is an additional reason of continuing food deprivation in Pakistan. Research limitations/implications - For the purpose of this analysis the authors use the food balance sheet data of Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, and hence assume all limitations of this database. Practical implications - This paper points out another reason to have inclusive form of the government in Pakistan: to reduce food deprivation. Originality/value - This paper is the first of its kind to assess the availability of food to the citizens of Pakistan under different regimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Azeem Qureshi & Ayaz Muhammad, 2010. "Is inclusive government more humane? Perspective on food availability in Pakistan," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(8), pages 562-573, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:v:37:y:2010:i:8:p:562-573
    DOI: 10.1108/03068291011060625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03068291011060625/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03068291011060625/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/03068291011060625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Azeem Qureshi, 2008. "Challenging trickle‐down approach," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(4), pages 269-282, March.
    2. Agcaoili-Sombilla, Mercedita & Rosegrant, Mark W., 1996. "South Asia and the global food situation: Challenges for strengthening food security," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 265-292.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Sardi & Enrico Sorano, 2019. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Ryan, James G., 2003. "Evaluating the impact of agricultural projection modeling using the "IMPACT” framework," Impact assessments 17, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. DeRosa, Dean A. & Sharma, Manohar & Wanmali, Sudhir, 1996. "Agriculture and food security in South Asia by the year 2020 : An introduction," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 247-250.
    4. Zhiping Song & Peishan Tong, 2022. "The Impact of Social Security Expenditure on Human Common Development: Evidence from China’s Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Matteo Pedercini & Santiago Movilla Blanco & Birgit Kopainsky, 2011. "Application of the Malaria Management Model to the Analysis of Costs and Benefits of DDT versus Non-DDT Malaria Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Muhammad Usman & Hafiz Waqas Kamran & Hassan Khalid, 2012. "Impact of Exports on Economic Growth- A Case of Luxemburg," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 4(1), pages 1-7.
    7. A. Sardi & E. Sorano, 2021. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Papers 2102.04090, arXiv.org.
    8. Pedercini, Matteo & Barney, Gerald O., 2010. "Dynamic analysis of interventions designed to achieve millennium development goals (MDG): The case of Ghana," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 89-99, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:v:37:y:2010:i:8:p:562-573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.