IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijppmp/ijppm-09-2016-0191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agency theory perspective on public-private-partnerships: international development project

Author

Listed:
  • David W. Parker
  • Uwe Dressel
  • Delroy Chevers
  • Luca Zeppetella

Abstract

Purpose - Agency theory suggests that divergences will occur when a principal, e.g. client, and agent e.g. a project manager, interests are different in the execution of a project. The purpose of this paper is to explore if the agency theory can explain the subtleties integral to the behaviours and relationships between players delivering a public-private-partnership (PPP) in the context of an international development (ID) project. The intra-/interpersonal dynamics include governments, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and private commercial service providers. The authors develop a conceptual framework and provide evidence from a case study of the testing of a Road Safety Toolkit in Kenya to explore several propositions. Design/methodology/approach - Extant literature identified application of the agency theory, and the development of a conceptual framework. A case study describing an ID project was used to validate the propositions prior to the expansion of a research instrument for data collection in the field. Findings - Through the lens of the agency theory and the limitations imposed by exploring a series of propositions, several insightful conclusions have been derived from the case. ID projects have particular nuisances that make them unique when compared to the majority of commercial applications. An added dimension and level of complexity is a consequence of the PPP incorporating government, NGOs and private corporations. The case exemplified the need for PPP ID projects to build on partner networks to influence and disseminate outcomes. Some agency problems were far less prominent than would normally be seen in a commercial project. Research limitations/implications - The methodologies presented in this paper need to be adapted and practiced in different kinds of ID projects in order to get confirmatory analytical results. The limitations imposed by the use of the single case, whilst drawing insightful conclusions, would necessitate greater testing in the field. Practical implications - Although the problems of the agency theory are well researched in the operations management literature, there is limited application to ID projects and no previous research within the context of a PPP. Therefore, this work is important for greater understanding of the specific issues associated with project delivery of an ID. Social implications - Conflicting goals between principals and agents are common for organisations, which in turn affect inter-relationships on an international footing. The agency theory has had little attention in the project management field, yet is fundamental to relationships and communication. Originality/value - There has been little research that explores the agency theory in the context of a PPP involving governments, NGOs and private commercial service providers, executed as an ID project. This work, therefore, exhibits new and novel findings.

Suggested Citation

  • David W. Parker & Uwe Dressel & Delroy Chevers & Luca Zeppetella, 2018. "Agency theory perspective on public-private-partnerships: international development project," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(2), pages 239-259, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:ijppm-09-2016-0191
    DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-09-2016-0191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2016-0191/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2016-0191/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2016-0191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeffrey Kouton & Wilfried Sanogo & Nandi Djomgoue, 2023. "Risk allocation in energy infrastructure PPPs projects in selected African countries: does institutional quality, PPPs experience and income level make a difference?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 537-580, February.
    2. Md. Raquibuzzaman Khan & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Nazia Tabassum & Niaz Ahmed Khan & Andrew M. McKenzie, 2023. "Supply chain challenges and recommendations for international development agriculture projects: an application of the FGD-fuzzy Delphi approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Asheem Shrestha & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Igor Martek & M Reza Hosseini & David J Edwards, 2019. "A Principal-Agent Theory Perspective on PPP Risk Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Darko, Deborah & Zhu, Demi & Quayson, Matthew & Hossin, Md Altab & Omoruyi, Osayuwamen & Bediako, Albert Kweku, 2023. "A multicriteria decision framework for governance of PPP projects towards sustainable development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    5. Sebastian Zwalf, 2022. "Managing goal conflict. The case of agency theory in the policy settings for public–private partnerships; A perspective on citizen and government interests," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(4), pages 913-930, December.
    6. Rayenda Khresna Brahmana & Doddy Setiawan & Maria Kontesa, 2022. "The blame game: COVID-19 crisis and financial performance," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(11), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Mark A. Moore & Aidan R. Vining, 2023. "PPP performance evaluation: the social welfare goal, principal–agent theory and political economy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 267-299, June.
    8. Jaehong Park & Jihyeon Lee & Sang-Joon Kim, 2020. "Robust Collective Impact: How Can a Company Make Collective Impact Sustainable in a Long Run?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Neema Kavishe & Nicholas Chileshe, 2018. "Identifying Project Management Practices and Principles for Public–Private Partnerships in Housing Projects: The Case of Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Daniel Dramani Kipo-Sunyehzi, 2020. "Public-Private Organizations Behaviour: the Paradoxes in the Implementation of Ghana’s Health Insurance Scheme," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 585-596, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:ijppm-09-2016-0191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.