Author
Listed:
- Jalil Heidary Dahooie
- Mohammad Reza Ghezel Arsalan
- Ali Zolghadr Shojai
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to propose a new method for knowledge worker productivity measurement which is based on valid principles and appropriate viewpoints. Design/methodology/approach - Based on an extensive and thorough literature review the elements that need to be taken into consideration, while designing a method for knowledge worker productivity measurement, are determined and divided into principles and viewpoints. These elements must be incorporated into the design of knowledge worker productivity measurement methods so that the correctness and accuracy of these methods can be verified. The proposed model, which is based on appropriate principles and viewpoints, determines the outputs of knowledge work with respect to the tasks that a worker’s job includes. Considering nine measures, these outputs are evaluated using fuzzy numbers and, then, quantified. The inputs of knowledge work are knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) required to do the job. These inputs are identified and quantified using Job Element Method. Furthermore, fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis is employed to model the productivity. Findings - In this paper, the proposed method for knowledge worker productivity measurement follows both appropriate principles and viewpoints, simultaneously. In order to validate the obtained results and explore the applicability of the proposed method, a case study was carried out at an Iranian organization in electric power industry. Statistical analyses are employed to prove the validity of the results. Based on the obtained results, the productivity of a knowledge worker is said to be high when he/she delivers the expected amount of job outputs considering the values of his/her inputs (KSAs). Originality/value - The originality of this paper is twofold. First, the extracted principles and viewpoints can serve as a guideline for the development of similar methods. Second, the proposed model offers an effective and efficient tool that can serve as the basis for the comparison among relative productivity of knowledge workers. Furthermore, the obtained results could form a basis to examine the productivity trend of each knowledge worker over different periods of time.
Suggested Citation
Jalil Heidary Dahooie & Mohammad Reza Ghezel Arsalan & Ali Zolghadr Shojai, 2018.
"A valid and applicable measurement method for knowledge worker productivity,"
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(9), pages 1764-1791, November.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijppmp:ijppm-07-2017-0176
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-07-2017-0176
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek & Bernard Ziębicki & Anna Wójcik-Karpacz, 2021.
"Organizational Culture as a Prerequisite for Knowledge Transfer among IT Professionals: The Case of Energy Companies,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, December.
- Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek, 2021.
"Social Facilitators of Specialist Knowledge Dispersion in the Digital Era,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:ijppm-07-2017-0176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.